Cargando…

Gender-Related Differences in Heart Failure Biomarkers

Important differences in comorbidities and clinical characteristics exist between women and men with heart failure (HF). In particular, differences in the kinetics of biological circulating biomarkers—a critical component of cardiovascular care—are highly relevant. Most circulating HF biomarkers are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cediel, Germán, Codina, Pau, Spitaleri, Giosafat, Domingo, Mar, Santiago-Vacas, Evelyn, Lupón, Josep, Bayes-Genis, Antoni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7813809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33469552
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2020.617705
_version_ 1783637932622479360
author Cediel, Germán
Codina, Pau
Spitaleri, Giosafat
Domingo, Mar
Santiago-Vacas, Evelyn
Lupón, Josep
Bayes-Genis, Antoni
author_facet Cediel, Germán
Codina, Pau
Spitaleri, Giosafat
Domingo, Mar
Santiago-Vacas, Evelyn
Lupón, Josep
Bayes-Genis, Antoni
author_sort Cediel, Germán
collection PubMed
description Important differences in comorbidities and clinical characteristics exist between women and men with heart failure (HF). In particular, differences in the kinetics of biological circulating biomarkers—a critical component of cardiovascular care—are highly relevant. Most circulating HF biomarkers are assessed daily by clinicians without taking sex into account, despite the multiple gender-related differences observed in plasma concentrations. Even in health, compared to men, women tend to exhibit higher levels of natriuretic peptides and galectin-3 and lower levels of cardiac troponins and the cardiac stress marker, soluble ST2. Many biological factors can provide a reliable explanation for these differences, like body composition, fat distribution, or menopausal status. Notwithstanding, these sex-specific differences in biomarker levels do not reflect different pathobiological mechanisms in HF between women and men, and they do not necessarily imply a need to use different diagnostic cut-off levels in clinical practice. To date, the sex-specific prognostic value of HF biomarkers for risk stratification is an unresolved issue that future research must elucidate. This review outlines current evidence regarding gender-related differences in circulating biomarkers widely used in HF, the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying these differences, and their clinical relevance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7813809
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78138092021-01-18 Gender-Related Differences in Heart Failure Biomarkers Cediel, Germán Codina, Pau Spitaleri, Giosafat Domingo, Mar Santiago-Vacas, Evelyn Lupón, Josep Bayes-Genis, Antoni Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine Important differences in comorbidities and clinical characteristics exist between women and men with heart failure (HF). In particular, differences in the kinetics of biological circulating biomarkers—a critical component of cardiovascular care—are highly relevant. Most circulating HF biomarkers are assessed daily by clinicians without taking sex into account, despite the multiple gender-related differences observed in plasma concentrations. Even in health, compared to men, women tend to exhibit higher levels of natriuretic peptides and galectin-3 and lower levels of cardiac troponins and the cardiac stress marker, soluble ST2. Many biological factors can provide a reliable explanation for these differences, like body composition, fat distribution, or menopausal status. Notwithstanding, these sex-specific differences in biomarker levels do not reflect different pathobiological mechanisms in HF between women and men, and they do not necessarily imply a need to use different diagnostic cut-off levels in clinical practice. To date, the sex-specific prognostic value of HF biomarkers for risk stratification is an unresolved issue that future research must elucidate. This review outlines current evidence regarding gender-related differences in circulating biomarkers widely used in HF, the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying these differences, and their clinical relevance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7813809/ /pubmed/33469552 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2020.617705 Text en Copyright © 2021 Cediel, Codina, Spitaleri, Domingo, Santiago-Vacas, Lupón and Bayes-Genis. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Cediel, Germán
Codina, Pau
Spitaleri, Giosafat
Domingo, Mar
Santiago-Vacas, Evelyn
Lupón, Josep
Bayes-Genis, Antoni
Gender-Related Differences in Heart Failure Biomarkers
title Gender-Related Differences in Heart Failure Biomarkers
title_full Gender-Related Differences in Heart Failure Biomarkers
title_fullStr Gender-Related Differences in Heart Failure Biomarkers
title_full_unstemmed Gender-Related Differences in Heart Failure Biomarkers
title_short Gender-Related Differences in Heart Failure Biomarkers
title_sort gender-related differences in heart failure biomarkers
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7813809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33469552
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2020.617705
work_keys_str_mv AT cedielgerman genderrelateddifferencesinheartfailurebiomarkers
AT codinapau genderrelateddifferencesinheartfailurebiomarkers
AT spitalerigiosafat genderrelateddifferencesinheartfailurebiomarkers
AT domingomar genderrelateddifferencesinheartfailurebiomarkers
AT santiagovacasevelyn genderrelateddifferencesinheartfailurebiomarkers
AT luponjosep genderrelateddifferencesinheartfailurebiomarkers
AT bayesgenisantoni genderrelateddifferencesinheartfailurebiomarkers