Cargando…
Gender-Related Differences in Heart Failure Biomarkers
Important differences in comorbidities and clinical characteristics exist between women and men with heart failure (HF). In particular, differences in the kinetics of biological circulating biomarkers—a critical component of cardiovascular care—are highly relevant. Most circulating HF biomarkers are...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7813809/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33469552 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2020.617705 |
_version_ | 1783637932622479360 |
---|---|
author | Cediel, Germán Codina, Pau Spitaleri, Giosafat Domingo, Mar Santiago-Vacas, Evelyn Lupón, Josep Bayes-Genis, Antoni |
author_facet | Cediel, Germán Codina, Pau Spitaleri, Giosafat Domingo, Mar Santiago-Vacas, Evelyn Lupón, Josep Bayes-Genis, Antoni |
author_sort | Cediel, Germán |
collection | PubMed |
description | Important differences in comorbidities and clinical characteristics exist between women and men with heart failure (HF). In particular, differences in the kinetics of biological circulating biomarkers—a critical component of cardiovascular care—are highly relevant. Most circulating HF biomarkers are assessed daily by clinicians without taking sex into account, despite the multiple gender-related differences observed in plasma concentrations. Even in health, compared to men, women tend to exhibit higher levels of natriuretic peptides and galectin-3 and lower levels of cardiac troponins and the cardiac stress marker, soluble ST2. Many biological factors can provide a reliable explanation for these differences, like body composition, fat distribution, or menopausal status. Notwithstanding, these sex-specific differences in biomarker levels do not reflect different pathobiological mechanisms in HF between women and men, and they do not necessarily imply a need to use different diagnostic cut-off levels in clinical practice. To date, the sex-specific prognostic value of HF biomarkers for risk stratification is an unresolved issue that future research must elucidate. This review outlines current evidence regarding gender-related differences in circulating biomarkers widely used in HF, the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying these differences, and their clinical relevance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7813809 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78138092021-01-18 Gender-Related Differences in Heart Failure Biomarkers Cediel, Germán Codina, Pau Spitaleri, Giosafat Domingo, Mar Santiago-Vacas, Evelyn Lupón, Josep Bayes-Genis, Antoni Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine Important differences in comorbidities and clinical characteristics exist between women and men with heart failure (HF). In particular, differences in the kinetics of biological circulating biomarkers—a critical component of cardiovascular care—are highly relevant. Most circulating HF biomarkers are assessed daily by clinicians without taking sex into account, despite the multiple gender-related differences observed in plasma concentrations. Even in health, compared to men, women tend to exhibit higher levels of natriuretic peptides and galectin-3 and lower levels of cardiac troponins and the cardiac stress marker, soluble ST2. Many biological factors can provide a reliable explanation for these differences, like body composition, fat distribution, or menopausal status. Notwithstanding, these sex-specific differences in biomarker levels do not reflect different pathobiological mechanisms in HF between women and men, and they do not necessarily imply a need to use different diagnostic cut-off levels in clinical practice. To date, the sex-specific prognostic value of HF biomarkers for risk stratification is an unresolved issue that future research must elucidate. This review outlines current evidence regarding gender-related differences in circulating biomarkers widely used in HF, the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying these differences, and their clinical relevance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7813809/ /pubmed/33469552 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2020.617705 Text en Copyright © 2021 Cediel, Codina, Spitaleri, Domingo, Santiago-Vacas, Lupón and Bayes-Genis. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Cediel, Germán Codina, Pau Spitaleri, Giosafat Domingo, Mar Santiago-Vacas, Evelyn Lupón, Josep Bayes-Genis, Antoni Gender-Related Differences in Heart Failure Biomarkers |
title | Gender-Related Differences in Heart Failure Biomarkers |
title_full | Gender-Related Differences in Heart Failure Biomarkers |
title_fullStr | Gender-Related Differences in Heart Failure Biomarkers |
title_full_unstemmed | Gender-Related Differences in Heart Failure Biomarkers |
title_short | Gender-Related Differences in Heart Failure Biomarkers |
title_sort | gender-related differences in heart failure biomarkers |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7813809/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33469552 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2020.617705 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cedielgerman genderrelateddifferencesinheartfailurebiomarkers AT codinapau genderrelateddifferencesinheartfailurebiomarkers AT spitalerigiosafat genderrelateddifferencesinheartfailurebiomarkers AT domingomar genderrelateddifferencesinheartfailurebiomarkers AT santiagovacasevelyn genderrelateddifferencesinheartfailurebiomarkers AT luponjosep genderrelateddifferencesinheartfailurebiomarkers AT bayesgenisantoni genderrelateddifferencesinheartfailurebiomarkers |