Cargando…

Comparison of different models to calculate the viscosity of biogas and biomethane in order to accurately measure flow rates for conformity assessment

The study presents an optimised method to correct flow rates measured with a LFE flowmeter pre-set on methane while used for gas mixtures of unknown composition at the time of the measurement. The method requires the correction of the flow rate using a factor based on the viscosity of the gas mixtur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arrhenius, Karine, Büker, Oliver
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7813840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33462276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81052-7
_version_ 1783637940238286848
author Arrhenius, Karine
Büker, Oliver
author_facet Arrhenius, Karine
Büker, Oliver
author_sort Arrhenius, Karine
collection PubMed
description The study presents an optimised method to correct flow rates measured with a LFE flowmeter pre-set on methane while used for gas mixtures of unknown composition at the time of the measurement. The method requires the correction of the flow rate using a factor based on the viscosity of the gas mixtures once the composition is accurately known. The method has several different possible applications inclusive for the sampling of biogas and biomethane onto sorbent tubes for conformity assessment for the determination of siloxanes, terpenes and VOC in general. Five models for the calculation of the viscosity of the gas mixtures were compared and the models were used for ten binary mixtures and four multi-component mixtures. The results of the evaluation of the different models showed that the correction method using the viscosity of the mixtures calculated with the model of Reichenberg and Carr showed the smallest biases for binary mixtures. For multi-component mixtures, the best results were obtained when using the models of Lucas and Carr.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7813840
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78138402021-01-21 Comparison of different models to calculate the viscosity of biogas and biomethane in order to accurately measure flow rates for conformity assessment Arrhenius, Karine Büker, Oliver Sci Rep Article The study presents an optimised method to correct flow rates measured with a LFE flowmeter pre-set on methane while used for gas mixtures of unknown composition at the time of the measurement. The method requires the correction of the flow rate using a factor based on the viscosity of the gas mixtures once the composition is accurately known. The method has several different possible applications inclusive for the sampling of biogas and biomethane onto sorbent tubes for conformity assessment for the determination of siloxanes, terpenes and VOC in general. Five models for the calculation of the viscosity of the gas mixtures were compared and the models were used for ten binary mixtures and four multi-component mixtures. The results of the evaluation of the different models showed that the correction method using the viscosity of the mixtures calculated with the model of Reichenberg and Carr showed the smallest biases for binary mixtures. For multi-component mixtures, the best results were obtained when using the models of Lucas and Carr. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7813840/ /pubmed/33462276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81052-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Arrhenius, Karine
Büker, Oliver
Comparison of different models to calculate the viscosity of biogas and biomethane in order to accurately measure flow rates for conformity assessment
title Comparison of different models to calculate the viscosity of biogas and biomethane in order to accurately measure flow rates for conformity assessment
title_full Comparison of different models to calculate the viscosity of biogas and biomethane in order to accurately measure flow rates for conformity assessment
title_fullStr Comparison of different models to calculate the viscosity of biogas and biomethane in order to accurately measure flow rates for conformity assessment
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different models to calculate the viscosity of biogas and biomethane in order to accurately measure flow rates for conformity assessment
title_short Comparison of different models to calculate the viscosity of biogas and biomethane in order to accurately measure flow rates for conformity assessment
title_sort comparison of different models to calculate the viscosity of biogas and biomethane in order to accurately measure flow rates for conformity assessment
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7813840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33462276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81052-7
work_keys_str_mv AT arrheniuskarine comparisonofdifferentmodelstocalculatetheviscosityofbiogasandbiomethaneinordertoaccuratelymeasureflowratesforconformityassessment
AT bukeroliver comparisonofdifferentmodelstocalculatetheviscosityofbiogasandbiomethaneinordertoaccuratelymeasureflowratesforconformityassessment