Cargando…

Development of bioactive resin modified glass ionomer cement for dental biomedical applications

It would certainly be an advantage of resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) if it can possess bioactivity. However, research related to that is still very limited. Hybridization of RMGIC was predicted to increase mechanical properties and resistance to disintegration, and low content of polyac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ana, Ika Dewi, Anggraeni, Rahmi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7814164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33506127
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e05944
_version_ 1783638009014386688
author Ana, Ika Dewi
Anggraeni, Rahmi
author_facet Ana, Ika Dewi
Anggraeni, Rahmi
author_sort Ana, Ika Dewi
collection PubMed
description It would certainly be an advantage of resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) if it can possess bioactivity. However, research related to that is still very limited. Hybridization of RMGIC was predicted to increase mechanical properties and resistance to disintegration, and low content of polyacrylic acid induces cement bioactivity. This study investigated the effect of BAG obtained from the CaSiO(3)–Ca(3)(PO(4))(2) system on RMGIC bioactivity. BAG samples containing 10%, 15%, and 20% P(2)O(5) (denoted as “CSP10,” “CSP15,” and “CSP20,” respectively) were used to modify RMGIC powder, and apatite wollastonite was used for comparison. Surface bioactivity was assessed using XRD pattern, infrared spectroscopy, and SEM microstructure after specimen immersion in simulated body fluid (SBF). Contents of Ca, P, F, Sr, and Al were measured in the remaining SBF. Cell attachment, proliferation, and differentiation on the RMGIC containing BAG were evaluated and compared with those on the RMGIC without BAG. Sr and Al analyses revealed that the addition of BAG may not influence the matrix stability of the cement. Moreover, the addition of BAG was a positive factor indicating excellent ion exchange in SBF and spontaneous growth of apatite by consuming the Ca and P ions in the surrounding fluid. Osteoblast differentiation was higher on the four types of bioactive cements than on the RMGIC without BAG. The results of these studies provide novel insights into the development of a new generation of osteoconductive biomedical materials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7814164
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78141642021-01-26 Development of bioactive resin modified glass ionomer cement for dental biomedical applications Ana, Ika Dewi Anggraeni, Rahmi Heliyon Research Article It would certainly be an advantage of resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) if it can possess bioactivity. However, research related to that is still very limited. Hybridization of RMGIC was predicted to increase mechanical properties and resistance to disintegration, and low content of polyacrylic acid induces cement bioactivity. This study investigated the effect of BAG obtained from the CaSiO(3)–Ca(3)(PO(4))(2) system on RMGIC bioactivity. BAG samples containing 10%, 15%, and 20% P(2)O(5) (denoted as “CSP10,” “CSP15,” and “CSP20,” respectively) were used to modify RMGIC powder, and apatite wollastonite was used for comparison. Surface bioactivity was assessed using XRD pattern, infrared spectroscopy, and SEM microstructure after specimen immersion in simulated body fluid (SBF). Contents of Ca, P, F, Sr, and Al were measured in the remaining SBF. Cell attachment, proliferation, and differentiation on the RMGIC containing BAG were evaluated and compared with those on the RMGIC without BAG. Sr and Al analyses revealed that the addition of BAG may not influence the matrix stability of the cement. Moreover, the addition of BAG was a positive factor indicating excellent ion exchange in SBF and spontaneous growth of apatite by consuming the Ca and P ions in the surrounding fluid. Osteoblast differentiation was higher on the four types of bioactive cements than on the RMGIC without BAG. The results of these studies provide novel insights into the development of a new generation of osteoconductive biomedical materials. Elsevier 2021-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7814164/ /pubmed/33506127 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e05944 Text en © 2021 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Ana, Ika Dewi
Anggraeni, Rahmi
Development of bioactive resin modified glass ionomer cement for dental biomedical applications
title Development of bioactive resin modified glass ionomer cement for dental biomedical applications
title_full Development of bioactive resin modified glass ionomer cement for dental biomedical applications
title_fullStr Development of bioactive resin modified glass ionomer cement for dental biomedical applications
title_full_unstemmed Development of bioactive resin modified glass ionomer cement for dental biomedical applications
title_short Development of bioactive resin modified glass ionomer cement for dental biomedical applications
title_sort development of bioactive resin modified glass ionomer cement for dental biomedical applications
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7814164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33506127
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e05944
work_keys_str_mv AT anaikadewi developmentofbioactiveresinmodifiedglassionomercementfordentalbiomedicalapplications
AT anggraenirahmi developmentofbioactiveresinmodifiedglassionomercementfordentalbiomedicalapplications