Cargando…
Trends in the management of anorectal melanoma: A multi-institutional retrospective study and review of the world literature
BACKGROUND: Anorectal melanoma (ARM) is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. Evidence on optimal treatment is limited and surgical management varies widely. We hypothesized that the frequency of abdominoperineal resection used as primary treatment of ARM has decreased over the past several decades....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7814367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33519141 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i3.267 |
_version_ | 1783638044784459776 |
---|---|
author | Bleicher, Josh Cohan, Jessica N Huang, Lyen C Peche, William Pickron, T Bartley Scaife, Courtney L Bowles, Tawnya L Hyngstrom, John R Asare, Elliot A |
author_facet | Bleicher, Josh Cohan, Jessica N Huang, Lyen C Peche, William Pickron, T Bartley Scaife, Courtney L Bowles, Tawnya L Hyngstrom, John R Asare, Elliot A |
author_sort | Bleicher, Josh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Anorectal melanoma (ARM) is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. Evidence on optimal treatment is limited and surgical management varies widely. We hypothesized that the frequency of abdominoperineal resection used as primary treatment of ARM has decreased over the past several decades. AIM: To update our understanding of outcomes for patients with ARM and analyze management trends around the world. METHODS: This is a multi-institutional, retrospective study of patients treated for ARM at 7 hospitals. Hospitals included both large, academic, tertiary care centers and smaller, general community hospitals. Using prospectively maintained institutional tumor registries, we identified 24 patients diagnosed with ARM between January 2000 and May 2019. We analyzed factors prognostic for recurrence and survival. We then used Cox regression to measure overall survival (OS) and melanoma-specific survival. We also performed a literature review to assess trends in surgical management and outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 24 patients diagnosed with ARM, 12 (50.0%) had local, 8 (33.3%) regional, and 4 (16.7%) distant disease at diagnosis. Median time to recurrence was 10.4 mo [interquartile range (IQR) 7.5-17.2] with only 2 patients (9.3%) not developing recurrence following surgical resection. Median OS was 18.8 mo (IQR 13.5-33.9). One patient is still alive without recurrence at 21.4 mo from diagnosis; no other patient survived 5 years. Primary surgical management with abdominoperineal resection (APR) vs wide excision (WE) did not lead to differences in OS [hazard ratio = 1.4 (95%CI: 0.3-6.8)]. Review of the literature revealed geographic differences in surgical management of ARM, with increased use of WE in the United States and Europe over time and more frequent use of APR in Asia and India. There was no significant improvement in survival over time. CONCLUSION: There is wide variation in the management of ARM and survival outcomes remain poor regardless of approach. Surgical management should aim to minimize morbidity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7814367 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78143672021-01-30 Trends in the management of anorectal melanoma: A multi-institutional retrospective study and review of the world literature Bleicher, Josh Cohan, Jessica N Huang, Lyen C Peche, William Pickron, T Bartley Scaife, Courtney L Bowles, Tawnya L Hyngstrom, John R Asare, Elliot A World J Gastroenterol Retrospective Study BACKGROUND: Anorectal melanoma (ARM) is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. Evidence on optimal treatment is limited and surgical management varies widely. We hypothesized that the frequency of abdominoperineal resection used as primary treatment of ARM has decreased over the past several decades. AIM: To update our understanding of outcomes for patients with ARM and analyze management trends around the world. METHODS: This is a multi-institutional, retrospective study of patients treated for ARM at 7 hospitals. Hospitals included both large, academic, tertiary care centers and smaller, general community hospitals. Using prospectively maintained institutional tumor registries, we identified 24 patients diagnosed with ARM between January 2000 and May 2019. We analyzed factors prognostic for recurrence and survival. We then used Cox regression to measure overall survival (OS) and melanoma-specific survival. We also performed a literature review to assess trends in surgical management and outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 24 patients diagnosed with ARM, 12 (50.0%) had local, 8 (33.3%) regional, and 4 (16.7%) distant disease at diagnosis. Median time to recurrence was 10.4 mo [interquartile range (IQR) 7.5-17.2] with only 2 patients (9.3%) not developing recurrence following surgical resection. Median OS was 18.8 mo (IQR 13.5-33.9). One patient is still alive without recurrence at 21.4 mo from diagnosis; no other patient survived 5 years. Primary surgical management with abdominoperineal resection (APR) vs wide excision (WE) did not lead to differences in OS [hazard ratio = 1.4 (95%CI: 0.3-6.8)]. Review of the literature revealed geographic differences in surgical management of ARM, with increased use of WE in the United States and Europe over time and more frequent use of APR in Asia and India. There was no significant improvement in survival over time. CONCLUSION: There is wide variation in the management of ARM and survival outcomes remain poor regardless of approach. Surgical management should aim to minimize morbidity. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021-01-21 2021-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7814367/ /pubmed/33519141 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i3.267 Text en ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Retrospective Study Bleicher, Josh Cohan, Jessica N Huang, Lyen C Peche, William Pickron, T Bartley Scaife, Courtney L Bowles, Tawnya L Hyngstrom, John R Asare, Elliot A Trends in the management of anorectal melanoma: A multi-institutional retrospective study and review of the world literature |
title | Trends in the management of anorectal melanoma: A multi-institutional retrospective study and review of the world literature |
title_full | Trends in the management of anorectal melanoma: A multi-institutional retrospective study and review of the world literature |
title_fullStr | Trends in the management of anorectal melanoma: A multi-institutional retrospective study and review of the world literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Trends in the management of anorectal melanoma: A multi-institutional retrospective study and review of the world literature |
title_short | Trends in the management of anorectal melanoma: A multi-institutional retrospective study and review of the world literature |
title_sort | trends in the management of anorectal melanoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study and review of the world literature |
topic | Retrospective Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7814367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33519141 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i3.267 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bleicherjosh trendsinthemanagementofanorectalmelanomaamultiinstitutionalretrospectivestudyandreviewoftheworldliterature AT cohanjessican trendsinthemanagementofanorectalmelanomaamultiinstitutionalretrospectivestudyandreviewoftheworldliterature AT huanglyenc trendsinthemanagementofanorectalmelanomaamultiinstitutionalretrospectivestudyandreviewoftheworldliterature AT pechewilliam trendsinthemanagementofanorectalmelanomaamultiinstitutionalretrospectivestudyandreviewoftheworldliterature AT pickrontbartley trendsinthemanagementofanorectalmelanomaamultiinstitutionalretrospectivestudyandreviewoftheworldliterature AT scaifecourtneyl trendsinthemanagementofanorectalmelanomaamultiinstitutionalretrospectivestudyandreviewoftheworldliterature AT bowlestawnyal trendsinthemanagementofanorectalmelanomaamultiinstitutionalretrospectivestudyandreviewoftheworldliterature AT hyngstromjohnr trendsinthemanagementofanorectalmelanomaamultiinstitutionalretrospectivestudyandreviewoftheworldliterature AT asareelliota trendsinthemanagementofanorectalmelanomaamultiinstitutionalretrospectivestudyandreviewoftheworldliterature |