Cargando…

Complex Surgical Reconstruction of Upper Pole Artery in Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND: The use of allografts with multiple renal arteries has increased in the era of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Although several studies recommend reconstructing lower pole arteries (LPAs) to reduce risk of urologic complications, it is common opinion to ligate upper pole arteries (UPAs)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vincenzi, Paolo, Gonzalez, Javier, Guerra, Giselle, Gaynor, Jeffrey J., Alvarez, Angel, Ciancio, Gaetano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7814512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33446626
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AOT.926850
_version_ 1783638069686042624
author Vincenzi, Paolo
Gonzalez, Javier
Guerra, Giselle
Gaynor, Jeffrey J.
Alvarez, Angel
Ciancio, Gaetano
author_facet Vincenzi, Paolo
Gonzalez, Javier
Guerra, Giselle
Gaynor, Jeffrey J.
Alvarez, Angel
Ciancio, Gaetano
author_sort Vincenzi, Paolo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of allografts with multiple renal arteries has increased in the era of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Although several studies recommend reconstructing lower pole arteries (LPAs) to reduce risk of urologic complications, it is common opinion to ligate upper pole arteries (UPAs) with a diameter less than 2 mm because of increased risk of thrombosis related to their reconstruction. This retrospective study evaluates the feasibility and safety of reconstructing thin UPAs during living-donor kidney transplantation, with the goal of maintaining the integrity of the graft and assuring its maximal function. MATERIAL/METHODS: Data from 922 living-donor kidney transplants performed between 2009 and 2019 were reviewed. Six cases with UPAs were identified (0.65%). The study endpoints were incidence of allograft vascular and urologic complications, slow graft function, delayed graft function, graft failure, and graft and patient survival. RESULTS: The UPAs had a mean diameter of 1.8±0.28 mm. Methods of reconstruction included: interposition graft (n=2), end-to-side anastomosis inside the renal hilum to a branch of the main renal artery (n=3), and side-to-side anastomosis with the main renal artery (n=1). Additional reconstruction of LPAs (n=2) and main renal arteries (n=2) was performed. During a median (range) follow-up of 14.5 (9–49) months no complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Ex vivo reconstruction of UPAs with a diameter less than 2 mm is worth attempting, particularly in the setting of living-donor kidney transplantation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7814512
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78145122021-01-22 Complex Surgical Reconstruction of Upper Pole Artery in Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation Vincenzi, Paolo Gonzalez, Javier Guerra, Giselle Gaynor, Jeffrey J. Alvarez, Angel Ciancio, Gaetano Ann Transplant Original Paper BACKGROUND: The use of allografts with multiple renal arteries has increased in the era of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Although several studies recommend reconstructing lower pole arteries (LPAs) to reduce risk of urologic complications, it is common opinion to ligate upper pole arteries (UPAs) with a diameter less than 2 mm because of increased risk of thrombosis related to their reconstruction. This retrospective study evaluates the feasibility and safety of reconstructing thin UPAs during living-donor kidney transplantation, with the goal of maintaining the integrity of the graft and assuring its maximal function. MATERIAL/METHODS: Data from 922 living-donor kidney transplants performed between 2009 and 2019 were reviewed. Six cases with UPAs were identified (0.65%). The study endpoints were incidence of allograft vascular and urologic complications, slow graft function, delayed graft function, graft failure, and graft and patient survival. RESULTS: The UPAs had a mean diameter of 1.8±0.28 mm. Methods of reconstruction included: interposition graft (n=2), end-to-side anastomosis inside the renal hilum to a branch of the main renal artery (n=3), and side-to-side anastomosis with the main renal artery (n=1). Additional reconstruction of LPAs (n=2) and main renal arteries (n=2) was performed. During a median (range) follow-up of 14.5 (9–49) months no complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Ex vivo reconstruction of UPAs with a diameter less than 2 mm is worth attempting, particularly in the setting of living-donor kidney transplantation. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2021-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7814512/ /pubmed/33446626 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AOT.926850 Text en © Ann Transplant, 2021 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Original Paper
Vincenzi, Paolo
Gonzalez, Javier
Guerra, Giselle
Gaynor, Jeffrey J.
Alvarez, Angel
Ciancio, Gaetano
Complex Surgical Reconstruction of Upper Pole Artery in Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation
title Complex Surgical Reconstruction of Upper Pole Artery in Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation
title_full Complex Surgical Reconstruction of Upper Pole Artery in Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation
title_fullStr Complex Surgical Reconstruction of Upper Pole Artery in Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation
title_full_unstemmed Complex Surgical Reconstruction of Upper Pole Artery in Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation
title_short Complex Surgical Reconstruction of Upper Pole Artery in Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation
title_sort complex surgical reconstruction of upper pole artery in living-donor kidney transplantation
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7814512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33446626
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AOT.926850
work_keys_str_mv AT vincenzipaolo complexsurgicalreconstructionofupperpolearteryinlivingdonorkidneytransplantation
AT gonzalezjavier complexsurgicalreconstructionofupperpolearteryinlivingdonorkidneytransplantation
AT guerragiselle complexsurgicalreconstructionofupperpolearteryinlivingdonorkidneytransplantation
AT gaynorjeffreyj complexsurgicalreconstructionofupperpolearteryinlivingdonorkidneytransplantation
AT alvarezangel complexsurgicalreconstructionofupperpolearteryinlivingdonorkidneytransplantation
AT cianciogaetano complexsurgicalreconstructionofupperpolearteryinlivingdonorkidneytransplantation