Cargando…
Complex Surgical Reconstruction of Upper Pole Artery in Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation
BACKGROUND: The use of allografts with multiple renal arteries has increased in the era of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Although several studies recommend reconstructing lower pole arteries (LPAs) to reduce risk of urologic complications, it is common opinion to ligate upper pole arteries (UPAs)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Scientific Literature, Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7814512/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33446626 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AOT.926850 |
_version_ | 1783638069686042624 |
---|---|
author | Vincenzi, Paolo Gonzalez, Javier Guerra, Giselle Gaynor, Jeffrey J. Alvarez, Angel Ciancio, Gaetano |
author_facet | Vincenzi, Paolo Gonzalez, Javier Guerra, Giselle Gaynor, Jeffrey J. Alvarez, Angel Ciancio, Gaetano |
author_sort | Vincenzi, Paolo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The use of allografts with multiple renal arteries has increased in the era of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Although several studies recommend reconstructing lower pole arteries (LPAs) to reduce risk of urologic complications, it is common opinion to ligate upper pole arteries (UPAs) with a diameter less than 2 mm because of increased risk of thrombosis related to their reconstruction. This retrospective study evaluates the feasibility and safety of reconstructing thin UPAs during living-donor kidney transplantation, with the goal of maintaining the integrity of the graft and assuring its maximal function. MATERIAL/METHODS: Data from 922 living-donor kidney transplants performed between 2009 and 2019 were reviewed. Six cases with UPAs were identified (0.65%). The study endpoints were incidence of allograft vascular and urologic complications, slow graft function, delayed graft function, graft failure, and graft and patient survival. RESULTS: The UPAs had a mean diameter of 1.8±0.28 mm. Methods of reconstruction included: interposition graft (n=2), end-to-side anastomosis inside the renal hilum to a branch of the main renal artery (n=3), and side-to-side anastomosis with the main renal artery (n=1). Additional reconstruction of LPAs (n=2) and main renal arteries (n=2) was performed. During a median (range) follow-up of 14.5 (9–49) months no complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Ex vivo reconstruction of UPAs with a diameter less than 2 mm is worth attempting, particularly in the setting of living-donor kidney transplantation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7814512 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | International Scientific Literature, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78145122021-01-22 Complex Surgical Reconstruction of Upper Pole Artery in Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation Vincenzi, Paolo Gonzalez, Javier Guerra, Giselle Gaynor, Jeffrey J. Alvarez, Angel Ciancio, Gaetano Ann Transplant Original Paper BACKGROUND: The use of allografts with multiple renal arteries has increased in the era of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Although several studies recommend reconstructing lower pole arteries (LPAs) to reduce risk of urologic complications, it is common opinion to ligate upper pole arteries (UPAs) with a diameter less than 2 mm because of increased risk of thrombosis related to their reconstruction. This retrospective study evaluates the feasibility and safety of reconstructing thin UPAs during living-donor kidney transplantation, with the goal of maintaining the integrity of the graft and assuring its maximal function. MATERIAL/METHODS: Data from 922 living-donor kidney transplants performed between 2009 and 2019 were reviewed. Six cases with UPAs were identified (0.65%). The study endpoints were incidence of allograft vascular and urologic complications, slow graft function, delayed graft function, graft failure, and graft and patient survival. RESULTS: The UPAs had a mean diameter of 1.8±0.28 mm. Methods of reconstruction included: interposition graft (n=2), end-to-side anastomosis inside the renal hilum to a branch of the main renal artery (n=3), and side-to-side anastomosis with the main renal artery (n=1). Additional reconstruction of LPAs (n=2) and main renal arteries (n=2) was performed. During a median (range) follow-up of 14.5 (9–49) months no complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Ex vivo reconstruction of UPAs with a diameter less than 2 mm is worth attempting, particularly in the setting of living-donor kidney transplantation. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2021-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7814512/ /pubmed/33446626 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AOT.926850 Text en © Ann Transplant, 2021 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ) |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Vincenzi, Paolo Gonzalez, Javier Guerra, Giselle Gaynor, Jeffrey J. Alvarez, Angel Ciancio, Gaetano Complex Surgical Reconstruction of Upper Pole Artery in Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation |
title | Complex Surgical Reconstruction of Upper Pole Artery in Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation |
title_full | Complex Surgical Reconstruction of Upper Pole Artery in Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation |
title_fullStr | Complex Surgical Reconstruction of Upper Pole Artery in Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation |
title_full_unstemmed | Complex Surgical Reconstruction of Upper Pole Artery in Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation |
title_short | Complex Surgical Reconstruction of Upper Pole Artery in Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation |
title_sort | complex surgical reconstruction of upper pole artery in living-donor kidney transplantation |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7814512/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33446626 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AOT.926850 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vincenzipaolo complexsurgicalreconstructionofupperpolearteryinlivingdonorkidneytransplantation AT gonzalezjavier complexsurgicalreconstructionofupperpolearteryinlivingdonorkidneytransplantation AT guerragiselle complexsurgicalreconstructionofupperpolearteryinlivingdonorkidneytransplantation AT gaynorjeffreyj complexsurgicalreconstructionofupperpolearteryinlivingdonorkidneytransplantation AT alvarezangel complexsurgicalreconstructionofupperpolearteryinlivingdonorkidneytransplantation AT cianciogaetano complexsurgicalreconstructionofupperpolearteryinlivingdonorkidneytransplantation |