Cargando…

Recontacting non-BRCA1/2 breast cancer patients for germline CHEK2 c.1100del pathogenic variant testing: uptake and patient experiences

BACKGROUND: CHEK2 has been recognized as a breast cancer risk gene with moderate effect. Women who have previously tested negative for a BRCA1/2 gene germline pathogenic variant may benefit from additional genetic testing for the CHEK2 c.1100del pathogenic variant. The aims of this study were: 1) to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Velthuizen, Mary E., van der Luijt, Rob B., de Vries, Beja J., Koudijs, Marco J., Bleiker, Eveline M. A., Ausems, Margreet G. E. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7814590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33468213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13053-021-00166-1
_version_ 1783638083463282688
author Velthuizen, Mary E.
van der Luijt, Rob B.
de Vries, Beja J.
Koudijs, Marco J.
Bleiker, Eveline M. A.
Ausems, Margreet G. E. M.
author_facet Velthuizen, Mary E.
van der Luijt, Rob B.
de Vries, Beja J.
Koudijs, Marco J.
Bleiker, Eveline M. A.
Ausems, Margreet G. E. M.
author_sort Velthuizen, Mary E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: CHEK2 has been recognized as a breast cancer risk gene with moderate effect. Women who have previously tested negative for a BRCA1/2 gene germline pathogenic variant may benefit from additional genetic testing for the CHEK2 c.1100del pathogenic variant. The aims of this study were: 1) to assess the uptake of an active approach by recontacting BRCA1/2-negative women for additional CHEK2 c.1100del testing on stored DNA-samples and 2) to explore patients’ experiences with this approach. METHODS: Between 2015 and 2017, women who had been tested earlier negative for BRCA1/2 germline pathogenic variants, were recontacted for additional CHEK2 c.1100del testing on stored DNA-samples, free-of-charge. They received an information letter about the CHEK2 pathogenic variant and could return an informed consent form when they opted for additional genetic testing. Those in whom the CHEK2 pathogenic variant was absent, received a letter describing this result. Those who tested positive, were invited for a personal counseling at the department of genetics. On average 21 months (range 4–27) after the genetic test result, a questionnaire was sent to all identified carriers and a control group of women who tested negative for the pathogenic variant to explore patients’ experiences with our approach. RESULTS: In total, 70% (N = 1666) of the N = 2377 women contacted opted for additional testing, and 66 (4%) of them proved to be carriers of the CHEK2 c.1100del pathogenic variant. Regardless of the outcome of the genetic test, women were generally satisfied with our approach and reported that the written information was sufficient to make an informed decision about the additional CHEK2 testing. CONCLUSIONS: The uptake (70%) of our approach was considered satisfactory. Patients considered the benefits more important than the psychosocial burden. Given the rapid developments in DNA-diagnostics, our findings may support future initiatives to recontact patients about additional genetic testing when they previously tested negative for a pathogenic variant in a breast cancer gene.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7814590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78145902021-01-19 Recontacting non-BRCA1/2 breast cancer patients for germline CHEK2 c.1100del pathogenic variant testing: uptake and patient experiences Velthuizen, Mary E. van der Luijt, Rob B. de Vries, Beja J. Koudijs, Marco J. Bleiker, Eveline M. A. Ausems, Margreet G. E. M. Hered Cancer Clin Pract Research BACKGROUND: CHEK2 has been recognized as a breast cancer risk gene with moderate effect. Women who have previously tested negative for a BRCA1/2 gene germline pathogenic variant may benefit from additional genetic testing for the CHEK2 c.1100del pathogenic variant. The aims of this study were: 1) to assess the uptake of an active approach by recontacting BRCA1/2-negative women for additional CHEK2 c.1100del testing on stored DNA-samples and 2) to explore patients’ experiences with this approach. METHODS: Between 2015 and 2017, women who had been tested earlier negative for BRCA1/2 germline pathogenic variants, were recontacted for additional CHEK2 c.1100del testing on stored DNA-samples, free-of-charge. They received an information letter about the CHEK2 pathogenic variant and could return an informed consent form when they opted for additional genetic testing. Those in whom the CHEK2 pathogenic variant was absent, received a letter describing this result. Those who tested positive, were invited for a personal counseling at the department of genetics. On average 21 months (range 4–27) after the genetic test result, a questionnaire was sent to all identified carriers and a control group of women who tested negative for the pathogenic variant to explore patients’ experiences with our approach. RESULTS: In total, 70% (N = 1666) of the N = 2377 women contacted opted for additional testing, and 66 (4%) of them proved to be carriers of the CHEK2 c.1100del pathogenic variant. Regardless of the outcome of the genetic test, women were generally satisfied with our approach and reported that the written information was sufficient to make an informed decision about the additional CHEK2 testing. CONCLUSIONS: The uptake (70%) of our approach was considered satisfactory. Patients considered the benefits more important than the psychosocial burden. Given the rapid developments in DNA-diagnostics, our findings may support future initiatives to recontact patients about additional genetic testing when they previously tested negative for a pathogenic variant in a breast cancer gene. BioMed Central 2021-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7814590/ /pubmed/33468213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13053-021-00166-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Velthuizen, Mary E.
van der Luijt, Rob B.
de Vries, Beja J.
Koudijs, Marco J.
Bleiker, Eveline M. A.
Ausems, Margreet G. E. M.
Recontacting non-BRCA1/2 breast cancer patients for germline CHEK2 c.1100del pathogenic variant testing: uptake and patient experiences
title Recontacting non-BRCA1/2 breast cancer patients for germline CHEK2 c.1100del pathogenic variant testing: uptake and patient experiences
title_full Recontacting non-BRCA1/2 breast cancer patients for germline CHEK2 c.1100del pathogenic variant testing: uptake and patient experiences
title_fullStr Recontacting non-BRCA1/2 breast cancer patients for germline CHEK2 c.1100del pathogenic variant testing: uptake and patient experiences
title_full_unstemmed Recontacting non-BRCA1/2 breast cancer patients for germline CHEK2 c.1100del pathogenic variant testing: uptake and patient experiences
title_short Recontacting non-BRCA1/2 breast cancer patients for germline CHEK2 c.1100del pathogenic variant testing: uptake and patient experiences
title_sort recontacting non-brca1/2 breast cancer patients for germline chek2 c.1100del pathogenic variant testing: uptake and patient experiences
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7814590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33468213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13053-021-00166-1
work_keys_str_mv AT velthuizenmarye recontactingnonbrca12breastcancerpatientsforgermlinechek2c1100delpathogenicvarianttestinguptakeandpatientexperiences
AT vanderluijtrobb recontactingnonbrca12breastcancerpatientsforgermlinechek2c1100delpathogenicvarianttestinguptakeandpatientexperiences
AT devriesbejaj recontactingnonbrca12breastcancerpatientsforgermlinechek2c1100delpathogenicvarianttestinguptakeandpatientexperiences
AT koudijsmarcoj recontactingnonbrca12breastcancerpatientsforgermlinechek2c1100delpathogenicvarianttestinguptakeandpatientexperiences
AT bleikerevelinema recontactingnonbrca12breastcancerpatientsforgermlinechek2c1100delpathogenicvarianttestinguptakeandpatientexperiences
AT ausemsmargreetgem recontactingnonbrca12breastcancerpatientsforgermlinechek2c1100delpathogenicvarianttestinguptakeandpatientexperiences