Cargando…

Utilization of serum D-dimer assays prior to computed tomography pulmonary angiography scans in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism among emergency department physicians: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND: A variety of evidence-based algorithms and decision rules using D-Dimer testing have been proposed as instruments to allow physicians to safely rule out a pulmonary embolism (PE) in low-risk patients. OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence of D-Dimer utilization among emergency department...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salehi, Leila, Phalpher, Prashant, Yu, Hubert, Jaskolka, Jeffrey, Ossip, Marc, Meaney, Christopher, Valani, Rahim, Mercuri, Mathew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7814629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33468044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-021-00401-x
_version_ 1783638092405538816
author Salehi, Leila
Phalpher, Prashant
Yu, Hubert
Jaskolka, Jeffrey
Ossip, Marc
Meaney, Christopher
Valani, Rahim
Mercuri, Mathew
author_facet Salehi, Leila
Phalpher, Prashant
Yu, Hubert
Jaskolka, Jeffrey
Ossip, Marc
Meaney, Christopher
Valani, Rahim
Mercuri, Mathew
author_sort Salehi, Leila
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A variety of evidence-based algorithms and decision rules using D-Dimer testing have been proposed as instruments to allow physicians to safely rule out a pulmonary embolism (PE) in low-risk patients. OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence of D-Dimer utilization among emergency department (ED) physicians and its impact on positive yields and utilization rates of Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA). METHODS: Data was collected on all CTPA studies ordered by ED physicians at three sites during a 2-year period. Using a chi-square test, we compared the diagnostic yield for those patients who had a D-Dimer prior to their CTPA and those who did not. Secondary analysis was done to examine the impact of D-Dimer testing prior to CTPA on individual physician diagnostic yield or utilization rate. RESULTS: A total of 2811 CTPAs were included in the analysis. Of these, 964 CTPAs (34.3%) were ordered without a D-Dimer, and 343 (18.7%) underwent a CTPA despite a negative D-Dimer. Those CTPAs preceded by a D-Dimer showed no significant difference in positive yields when compared to those ordered without a D-Dimer (9.9% versus 11.3%, p = 0.26). At the individual physician level, no statistically significant relationship was found between D-Dimer utilization and CTPA utilization rate or diagnostic yield. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence of suboptimal adherence to guidelines in terms of D-Dimer screening prior to CTPA, and forgoing CTPAs in patients with negative D-Dimers. However, the lack of a positive impact of D-Dimer testing on either CTPA diagnostic yield or utilization rate is indicative of issues relating to the high false-positive rates associated with D-Dimer screening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7814629
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78146292021-01-19 Utilization of serum D-dimer assays prior to computed tomography pulmonary angiography scans in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism among emergency department physicians: a retrospective observational study Salehi, Leila Phalpher, Prashant Yu, Hubert Jaskolka, Jeffrey Ossip, Marc Meaney, Christopher Valani, Rahim Mercuri, Mathew BMC Emerg Med Research Article BACKGROUND: A variety of evidence-based algorithms and decision rules using D-Dimer testing have been proposed as instruments to allow physicians to safely rule out a pulmonary embolism (PE) in low-risk patients. OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence of D-Dimer utilization among emergency department (ED) physicians and its impact on positive yields and utilization rates of Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA). METHODS: Data was collected on all CTPA studies ordered by ED physicians at three sites during a 2-year period. Using a chi-square test, we compared the diagnostic yield for those patients who had a D-Dimer prior to their CTPA and those who did not. Secondary analysis was done to examine the impact of D-Dimer testing prior to CTPA on individual physician diagnostic yield or utilization rate. RESULTS: A total of 2811 CTPAs were included in the analysis. Of these, 964 CTPAs (34.3%) were ordered without a D-Dimer, and 343 (18.7%) underwent a CTPA despite a negative D-Dimer. Those CTPAs preceded by a D-Dimer showed no significant difference in positive yields when compared to those ordered without a D-Dimer (9.9% versus 11.3%, p = 0.26). At the individual physician level, no statistically significant relationship was found between D-Dimer utilization and CTPA utilization rate or diagnostic yield. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence of suboptimal adherence to guidelines in terms of D-Dimer screening prior to CTPA, and forgoing CTPAs in patients with negative D-Dimers. However, the lack of a positive impact of D-Dimer testing on either CTPA diagnostic yield or utilization rate is indicative of issues relating to the high false-positive rates associated with D-Dimer screening. BioMed Central 2021-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7814629/ /pubmed/33468044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-021-00401-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Salehi, Leila
Phalpher, Prashant
Yu, Hubert
Jaskolka, Jeffrey
Ossip, Marc
Meaney, Christopher
Valani, Rahim
Mercuri, Mathew
Utilization of serum D-dimer assays prior to computed tomography pulmonary angiography scans in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism among emergency department physicians: a retrospective observational study
title Utilization of serum D-dimer assays prior to computed tomography pulmonary angiography scans in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism among emergency department physicians: a retrospective observational study
title_full Utilization of serum D-dimer assays prior to computed tomography pulmonary angiography scans in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism among emergency department physicians: a retrospective observational study
title_fullStr Utilization of serum D-dimer assays prior to computed tomography pulmonary angiography scans in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism among emergency department physicians: a retrospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Utilization of serum D-dimer assays prior to computed tomography pulmonary angiography scans in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism among emergency department physicians: a retrospective observational study
title_short Utilization of serum D-dimer assays prior to computed tomography pulmonary angiography scans in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism among emergency department physicians: a retrospective observational study
title_sort utilization of serum d-dimer assays prior to computed tomography pulmonary angiography scans in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism among emergency department physicians: a retrospective observational study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7814629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33468044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-021-00401-x
work_keys_str_mv AT salehileila utilizationofserumddimerassayspriortocomputedtomographypulmonaryangiographyscansinthediagnosisofpulmonaryembolismamongemergencydepartmentphysiciansaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT phalpherprashant utilizationofserumddimerassayspriortocomputedtomographypulmonaryangiographyscansinthediagnosisofpulmonaryembolismamongemergencydepartmentphysiciansaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT yuhubert utilizationofserumddimerassayspriortocomputedtomographypulmonaryangiographyscansinthediagnosisofpulmonaryembolismamongemergencydepartmentphysiciansaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT jaskolkajeffrey utilizationofserumddimerassayspriortocomputedtomographypulmonaryangiographyscansinthediagnosisofpulmonaryembolismamongemergencydepartmentphysiciansaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT ossipmarc utilizationofserumddimerassayspriortocomputedtomographypulmonaryangiographyscansinthediagnosisofpulmonaryembolismamongemergencydepartmentphysiciansaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT meaneychristopher utilizationofserumddimerassayspriortocomputedtomographypulmonaryangiographyscansinthediagnosisofpulmonaryembolismamongemergencydepartmentphysiciansaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT valanirahim utilizationofserumddimerassayspriortocomputedtomographypulmonaryangiographyscansinthediagnosisofpulmonaryembolismamongemergencydepartmentphysiciansaretrospectiveobservationalstudy
AT mercurimathew utilizationofserumddimerassayspriortocomputedtomographypulmonaryangiographyscansinthediagnosisofpulmonaryembolismamongemergencydepartmentphysiciansaretrospectiveobservationalstudy