Cargando…

Anatomic variations of the osteomeatal complex and its relationship to patency of the maxillary ostium: A retrospective evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography and its implications for sinus augmentation

AIM: The aim of this study is to determine the incidence of obliterated osteomeatal complex (OMC) due to the presence of anatomic variants. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Retrospective Study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, a total of 71 patients, 34 males and 37 females, aged 35–65 years...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sandhu, Ramandeep, Kheur, Mohit Gurunath, Lakha, Tabrez Amin, Supriya, M., Valentini, Pascal, Le, Bach
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7814679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33487964
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_113_20
_version_ 1783638102672146432
author Sandhu, Ramandeep
Kheur, Mohit Gurunath
Lakha, Tabrez Amin
Supriya, M.
Valentini, Pascal
Le, Bach
author_facet Sandhu, Ramandeep
Kheur, Mohit Gurunath
Lakha, Tabrez Amin
Supriya, M.
Valentini, Pascal
Le, Bach
author_sort Sandhu, Ramandeep
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of this study is to determine the incidence of obliterated osteomeatal complex (OMC) due to the presence of anatomic variants. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Retrospective Study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, a total of 71 patients, 34 males and 37 females, aged 35–65 years were included in the study. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of patients were assessed to identify the status of the OMC in the presence of anatomic variants and their incidence was recorded. The radiological assessment of the anatomical variants was made by viewing the coronal sections of the scans. The variants observed were deviated nasal septum, uncinate process), agger nasi, Haller cells, middle turbinate variants, enlarged bulla, accessory ostium, and maxillary sinus abnormalities). Ostium patency was evaluated in the coronal section of each sinus and classified as “patent” or “obstructed.” The most common variants observed were then correlated with the patency of the ostium. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Chi square test was performed to assess the association between the anatomic variants and the patency of the OMC. RESULTS: In the present study, the incidence of an obliterated OMC due to the presence of anatomic variants was 73.2%. The four most common variants associated with the possibility of an obliterated OMC were the deviated nasal septum (76.2%), middle turbinate (86.4%), enlarged bulla (77.8%), and sinus cavity variants (80.0%). A statistically significant association was noted between middle turbinate variants and Haller cells and the patency of the OMC. CONCLUSION: Thorough pretreatment CBCT evaluation should be performed to assess the presence of anatomic variants and thereby, the patency of the ostium before sinus floor elevation procedures. The pre and postsurgical treatment plans and regimes can be modified according to anticipated postsurgical sequelae, thereby avoiding postsurgical complications and enhancing the success of the graft procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7814679
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78146792021-10-01 Anatomic variations of the osteomeatal complex and its relationship to patency of the maxillary ostium: A retrospective evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography and its implications for sinus augmentation Sandhu, Ramandeep Kheur, Mohit Gurunath Lakha, Tabrez Amin Supriya, M. Valentini, Pascal Le, Bach J Indian Prosthodont Soc Original Article AIM: The aim of this study is to determine the incidence of obliterated osteomeatal complex (OMC) due to the presence of anatomic variants. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Retrospective Study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, a total of 71 patients, 34 males and 37 females, aged 35–65 years were included in the study. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of patients were assessed to identify the status of the OMC in the presence of anatomic variants and their incidence was recorded. The radiological assessment of the anatomical variants was made by viewing the coronal sections of the scans. The variants observed were deviated nasal septum, uncinate process), agger nasi, Haller cells, middle turbinate variants, enlarged bulla, accessory ostium, and maxillary sinus abnormalities). Ostium patency was evaluated in the coronal section of each sinus and classified as “patent” or “obstructed.” The most common variants observed were then correlated with the patency of the ostium. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Chi square test was performed to assess the association between the anatomic variants and the patency of the OMC. RESULTS: In the present study, the incidence of an obliterated OMC due to the presence of anatomic variants was 73.2%. The four most common variants associated with the possibility of an obliterated OMC were the deviated nasal septum (76.2%), middle turbinate (86.4%), enlarged bulla (77.8%), and sinus cavity variants (80.0%). A statistically significant association was noted between middle turbinate variants and Haller cells and the patency of the OMC. CONCLUSION: Thorough pretreatment CBCT evaluation should be performed to assess the presence of anatomic variants and thereby, the patency of the ostium before sinus floor elevation procedures. The pre and postsurgical treatment plans and regimes can be modified according to anticipated postsurgical sequelae, thereby avoiding postsurgical complications and enhancing the success of the graft procedure. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7814679/ /pubmed/33487964 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_113_20 Text en Copyright: © 2020 The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sandhu, Ramandeep
Kheur, Mohit Gurunath
Lakha, Tabrez Amin
Supriya, M.
Valentini, Pascal
Le, Bach
Anatomic variations of the osteomeatal complex and its relationship to patency of the maxillary ostium: A retrospective evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography and its implications for sinus augmentation
title Anatomic variations of the osteomeatal complex and its relationship to patency of the maxillary ostium: A retrospective evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography and its implications for sinus augmentation
title_full Anatomic variations of the osteomeatal complex and its relationship to patency of the maxillary ostium: A retrospective evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography and its implications for sinus augmentation
title_fullStr Anatomic variations of the osteomeatal complex and its relationship to patency of the maxillary ostium: A retrospective evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography and its implications for sinus augmentation
title_full_unstemmed Anatomic variations of the osteomeatal complex and its relationship to patency of the maxillary ostium: A retrospective evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography and its implications for sinus augmentation
title_short Anatomic variations of the osteomeatal complex and its relationship to patency of the maxillary ostium: A retrospective evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography and its implications for sinus augmentation
title_sort anatomic variations of the osteomeatal complex and its relationship to patency of the maxillary ostium: a retrospective evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography and its implications for sinus augmentation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7814679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33487964
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_113_20
work_keys_str_mv AT sandhuramandeep anatomicvariationsoftheosteomeatalcomplexanditsrelationshiptopatencyofthemaxillaryostiumaretrospectiveevaluationofconebeamcomputedtomographyanditsimplicationsforsinusaugmentation
AT kheurmohitgurunath anatomicvariationsoftheosteomeatalcomplexanditsrelationshiptopatencyofthemaxillaryostiumaretrospectiveevaluationofconebeamcomputedtomographyanditsimplicationsforsinusaugmentation
AT lakhatabrezamin anatomicvariationsoftheosteomeatalcomplexanditsrelationshiptopatencyofthemaxillaryostiumaretrospectiveevaluationofconebeamcomputedtomographyanditsimplicationsforsinusaugmentation
AT supriyam anatomicvariationsoftheosteomeatalcomplexanditsrelationshiptopatencyofthemaxillaryostiumaretrospectiveevaluationofconebeamcomputedtomographyanditsimplicationsforsinusaugmentation
AT valentinipascal anatomicvariationsoftheosteomeatalcomplexanditsrelationshiptopatencyofthemaxillaryostiumaretrospectiveevaluationofconebeamcomputedtomographyanditsimplicationsforsinusaugmentation
AT lebach anatomicvariationsoftheosteomeatalcomplexanditsrelationshiptopatencyofthemaxillaryostiumaretrospectiveevaluationofconebeamcomputedtomographyanditsimplicationsforsinusaugmentation