Cargando…

Clinical evaluation of “componeers” and direct composite veneers using minimally invasive enamel preparation technique: In vivo study

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical behavior of prefabricated componeers and direct composite veneering. The objective of the study was to compare the changes in color, surface texture, marginal integrity, and gingival response for componeers and direct composite veneers. SETTING...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dua, Parag, Londhe, Sanjay Manohar, Dua, Gaurav, Kotwal, Atul, Gupta, Sachin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7814685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33487971
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_95_20
_version_ 1783638104094015488
author Dua, Parag
Londhe, Sanjay Manohar
Dua, Gaurav
Kotwal, Atul
Gupta, Sachin
author_facet Dua, Parag
Londhe, Sanjay Manohar
Dua, Gaurav
Kotwal, Atul
Gupta, Sachin
author_sort Dua, Parag
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical behavior of prefabricated componeers and direct composite veneering. The objective of the study was to compare the changes in color, surface texture, marginal integrity, and gingival response for componeers and direct composite veneers. SETTINGS AND STUDY DESIGN: This was an in vivo, comparative study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients indicated for anterior veneers were selected and divided into Groups A and B of five patients each. Group A was restored with componeers and Group B with direct composite veneers. Both the groups were compared for color changes, surface textural changes, marginal integrity, and gingival response, starting immediately post veneering and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months subsequently. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Friedman's two-way analysis of variance and Mann–Whitney test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Results for color ranged from excellent to good with minimal color changes post veneering. Overall, “gingival response,” in both the groups, showed statistically significant differences in mean rank scores (P ≤ 0.05). The data depicted an improvement in gingival response for all patients during the period of the study. Surface textural changes were significant only for maxillary right canine and maxillary left lateral incisor (P = 0.024 and 0.039, respectively) in both the groups. Maxillary right canine in both the groups showed significant changes in marginal integrity. Intergroup comparison of gingival response, surface texture, and marginal integrity depicted no significant difference between the groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study concluded that the intergroup comparison of componeers and direct composite veneers for the parameters, gingival response, surface texture, and marginal integrity did not depict any significant differences. Both the groups displayed minimal changes in color, surface texture, and marginal integrity and improved gingival response.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7814685
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78146852021-10-01 Clinical evaluation of “componeers” and direct composite veneers using minimally invasive enamel preparation technique: In vivo study Dua, Parag Londhe, Sanjay Manohar Dua, Gaurav Kotwal, Atul Gupta, Sachin J Indian Prosthodont Soc Original Article AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical behavior of prefabricated componeers and direct composite veneering. The objective of the study was to compare the changes in color, surface texture, marginal integrity, and gingival response for componeers and direct composite veneers. SETTINGS AND STUDY DESIGN: This was an in vivo, comparative study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients indicated for anterior veneers were selected and divided into Groups A and B of five patients each. Group A was restored with componeers and Group B with direct composite veneers. Both the groups were compared for color changes, surface textural changes, marginal integrity, and gingival response, starting immediately post veneering and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months subsequently. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Friedman's two-way analysis of variance and Mann–Whitney test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Results for color ranged from excellent to good with minimal color changes post veneering. Overall, “gingival response,” in both the groups, showed statistically significant differences in mean rank scores (P ≤ 0.05). The data depicted an improvement in gingival response for all patients during the period of the study. Surface textural changes were significant only for maxillary right canine and maxillary left lateral incisor (P = 0.024 and 0.039, respectively) in both the groups. Maxillary right canine in both the groups showed significant changes in marginal integrity. Intergroup comparison of gingival response, surface texture, and marginal integrity depicted no significant difference between the groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study concluded that the intergroup comparison of componeers and direct composite veneers for the parameters, gingival response, surface texture, and marginal integrity did not depict any significant differences. Both the groups displayed minimal changes in color, surface texture, and marginal integrity and improved gingival response. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7814685/ /pubmed/33487971 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_95_20 Text en Copyright: © 2020 The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Dua, Parag
Londhe, Sanjay Manohar
Dua, Gaurav
Kotwal, Atul
Gupta, Sachin
Clinical evaluation of “componeers” and direct composite veneers using minimally invasive enamel preparation technique: In vivo study
title Clinical evaluation of “componeers” and direct composite veneers using minimally invasive enamel preparation technique: In vivo study
title_full Clinical evaluation of “componeers” and direct composite veneers using minimally invasive enamel preparation technique: In vivo study
title_fullStr Clinical evaluation of “componeers” and direct composite veneers using minimally invasive enamel preparation technique: In vivo study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical evaluation of “componeers” and direct composite veneers using minimally invasive enamel preparation technique: In vivo study
title_short Clinical evaluation of “componeers” and direct composite veneers using minimally invasive enamel preparation technique: In vivo study
title_sort clinical evaluation of “componeers” and direct composite veneers using minimally invasive enamel preparation technique: in vivo study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7814685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33487971
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_95_20
work_keys_str_mv AT duaparag clinicalevaluationofcomponeersanddirectcompositeveneersusingminimallyinvasiveenamelpreparationtechniqueinvivostudy
AT londhesanjaymanohar clinicalevaluationofcomponeersanddirectcompositeveneersusingminimallyinvasiveenamelpreparationtechniqueinvivostudy
AT duagaurav clinicalevaluationofcomponeersanddirectcompositeveneersusingminimallyinvasiveenamelpreparationtechniqueinvivostudy
AT kotwalatul clinicalevaluationofcomponeersanddirectcompositeveneersusingminimallyinvasiveenamelpreparationtechniqueinvivostudy
AT guptasachin clinicalevaluationofcomponeersanddirectcompositeveneersusingminimallyinvasiveenamelpreparationtechniqueinvivostudy