Cargando…

“SQiD, the Single Question in Delirium; can a single question help clinicians to detect delirium in hospitalised cancer patients?” running heading Single Question in Delirium” (Bcan-D-20-01665)

AIM: A serious syndrome for cancer in-patients, delirium risk increases with age and medical acuity. Screening tools exist but detection is frequently delayed or missed. We test the ‘Single Question in Delirium’ (SQiD), in comparison to psychiatrist clinical interview. METHODS: Inpatients in two com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sands, Megan B., Sharma, Swapnil, Carpenter, Lindsay, Hartshorn, Andrew, Lee, Jessica T., Lujic, Sanja, Congdon, Megan E., Buchanan, Angus M., Agar, Meera, Vardy, Janette L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7814717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33461523
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07504-x
_version_ 1783638110306828288
author Sands, Megan B.
Sharma, Swapnil
Carpenter, Lindsay
Hartshorn, Andrew
Lee, Jessica T.
Lujic, Sanja
Congdon, Megan E.
Buchanan, Angus M.
Agar, Meera
Vardy, Janette L.
author_facet Sands, Megan B.
Sharma, Swapnil
Carpenter, Lindsay
Hartshorn, Andrew
Lee, Jessica T.
Lujic, Sanja
Congdon, Megan E.
Buchanan, Angus M.
Agar, Meera
Vardy, Janette L.
author_sort Sands, Megan B.
collection PubMed
description AIM: A serious syndrome for cancer in-patients, delirium risk increases with age and medical acuity. Screening tools exist but detection is frequently delayed or missed. We test the ‘Single Question in Delirium’ (SQiD), in comparison to psychiatrist clinical interview. METHODS: Inpatients in two comprehensive cancer centres were prospectively screened. Clinical staff asked informants to respond to the SQiD: “Do you feel that [patient’s name] has been more confused lately?”. The primary endpoint was negative predictive value (NPV) of the SQiD versus psychiatrist diagnosis (Diagnostic and Statistics Manual criteria). Secondary endpoints included: NPV of the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), sensitivity, specificity and Cohen’s Kappa coefficient. RESULTS: Between May 2012 and July 2015, the SQiD plus CAM was applied to 122 patients; 73 had the SQiD and psychiatrist interview. Median age was 65 yrs. (interquartile range 54–74), 46% were female; median length of hospital stay was 12 days (5–18 days). Major cancer types were lung (19%), gastric or other upper GI (15%) and breast (14%). 70% of participants had stage 4 cancer. Diagnostic values were similar between the SQiD (NPV = 74, 95% CI 67–81; kappa = 0.32) and CAM (NPV = 72, 95% CI 67–77, kappa = 0.32), compared with psychiatrist interview. Overall the CAM identified only a small number of delirious cases but all were true positives. The specificity of the SQiD was 87% (74–95) The SQiD had higher sensitivity than CAM (44% [95% CI 41–80] vs 26% [10–48]). CONCLUSION: The SQiD, administered by bedside clinical staff, was feasible and its psychometric properties are now better understood. The SQiD can contribute to delirium detection and clinical care for hospitalised cancer patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s12885-020-07504-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7814717
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78147172021-01-21 “SQiD, the Single Question in Delirium; can a single question help clinicians to detect delirium in hospitalised cancer patients?” running heading Single Question in Delirium” (Bcan-D-20-01665) Sands, Megan B. Sharma, Swapnil Carpenter, Lindsay Hartshorn, Andrew Lee, Jessica T. Lujic, Sanja Congdon, Megan E. Buchanan, Angus M. Agar, Meera Vardy, Janette L. BMC Cancer Research Article AIM: A serious syndrome for cancer in-patients, delirium risk increases with age and medical acuity. Screening tools exist but detection is frequently delayed or missed. We test the ‘Single Question in Delirium’ (SQiD), in comparison to psychiatrist clinical interview. METHODS: Inpatients in two comprehensive cancer centres were prospectively screened. Clinical staff asked informants to respond to the SQiD: “Do you feel that [patient’s name] has been more confused lately?”. The primary endpoint was negative predictive value (NPV) of the SQiD versus psychiatrist diagnosis (Diagnostic and Statistics Manual criteria). Secondary endpoints included: NPV of the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), sensitivity, specificity and Cohen’s Kappa coefficient. RESULTS: Between May 2012 and July 2015, the SQiD plus CAM was applied to 122 patients; 73 had the SQiD and psychiatrist interview. Median age was 65 yrs. (interquartile range 54–74), 46% were female; median length of hospital stay was 12 days (5–18 days). Major cancer types were lung (19%), gastric or other upper GI (15%) and breast (14%). 70% of participants had stage 4 cancer. Diagnostic values were similar between the SQiD (NPV = 74, 95% CI 67–81; kappa = 0.32) and CAM (NPV = 72, 95% CI 67–77, kappa = 0.32), compared with psychiatrist interview. Overall the CAM identified only a small number of delirious cases but all were true positives. The specificity of the SQiD was 87% (74–95) The SQiD had higher sensitivity than CAM (44% [95% CI 41–80] vs 26% [10–48]). CONCLUSION: The SQiD, administered by bedside clinical staff, was feasible and its psychometric properties are now better understood. The SQiD can contribute to delirium detection and clinical care for hospitalised cancer patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s12885-020-07504-x. BioMed Central 2021-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7814717/ /pubmed/33461523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07504-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sands, Megan B.
Sharma, Swapnil
Carpenter, Lindsay
Hartshorn, Andrew
Lee, Jessica T.
Lujic, Sanja
Congdon, Megan E.
Buchanan, Angus M.
Agar, Meera
Vardy, Janette L.
“SQiD, the Single Question in Delirium; can a single question help clinicians to detect delirium in hospitalised cancer patients?” running heading Single Question in Delirium” (Bcan-D-20-01665)
title “SQiD, the Single Question in Delirium; can a single question help clinicians to detect delirium in hospitalised cancer patients?” running heading Single Question in Delirium” (Bcan-D-20-01665)
title_full “SQiD, the Single Question in Delirium; can a single question help clinicians to detect delirium in hospitalised cancer patients?” running heading Single Question in Delirium” (Bcan-D-20-01665)
title_fullStr “SQiD, the Single Question in Delirium; can a single question help clinicians to detect delirium in hospitalised cancer patients?” running heading Single Question in Delirium” (Bcan-D-20-01665)
title_full_unstemmed “SQiD, the Single Question in Delirium; can a single question help clinicians to detect delirium in hospitalised cancer patients?” running heading Single Question in Delirium” (Bcan-D-20-01665)
title_short “SQiD, the Single Question in Delirium; can a single question help clinicians to detect delirium in hospitalised cancer patients?” running heading Single Question in Delirium” (Bcan-D-20-01665)
title_sort “sqid, the single question in delirium; can a single question help clinicians to detect delirium in hospitalised cancer patients?” running heading single question in delirium” (bcan-d-20-01665)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7814717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33461523
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07504-x
work_keys_str_mv AT sandsmeganb sqidthesinglequestionindeliriumcanasinglequestionhelpclinicianstodetectdeliriuminhospitalisedcancerpatientsrunningheadingsinglequestionindeliriumbcand2001665
AT sharmaswapnil sqidthesinglequestionindeliriumcanasinglequestionhelpclinicianstodetectdeliriuminhospitalisedcancerpatientsrunningheadingsinglequestionindeliriumbcand2001665
AT carpenterlindsay sqidthesinglequestionindeliriumcanasinglequestionhelpclinicianstodetectdeliriuminhospitalisedcancerpatientsrunningheadingsinglequestionindeliriumbcand2001665
AT hartshornandrew sqidthesinglequestionindeliriumcanasinglequestionhelpclinicianstodetectdeliriuminhospitalisedcancerpatientsrunningheadingsinglequestionindeliriumbcand2001665
AT leejessicat sqidthesinglequestionindeliriumcanasinglequestionhelpclinicianstodetectdeliriuminhospitalisedcancerpatientsrunningheadingsinglequestionindeliriumbcand2001665
AT lujicsanja sqidthesinglequestionindeliriumcanasinglequestionhelpclinicianstodetectdeliriuminhospitalisedcancerpatientsrunningheadingsinglequestionindeliriumbcand2001665
AT congdonmegane sqidthesinglequestionindeliriumcanasinglequestionhelpclinicianstodetectdeliriuminhospitalisedcancerpatientsrunningheadingsinglequestionindeliriumbcand2001665
AT buchananangusm sqidthesinglequestionindeliriumcanasinglequestionhelpclinicianstodetectdeliriuminhospitalisedcancerpatientsrunningheadingsinglequestionindeliriumbcand2001665
AT agarmeera sqidthesinglequestionindeliriumcanasinglequestionhelpclinicianstodetectdeliriuminhospitalisedcancerpatientsrunningheadingsinglequestionindeliriumbcand2001665
AT vardyjanettel sqidthesinglequestionindeliriumcanasinglequestionhelpclinicianstodetectdeliriuminhospitalisedcancerpatientsrunningheadingsinglequestionindeliriumbcand2001665