Cargando…

Identification of DNA methylation signatures associated with poor outcome in lower-risk Stage, Size, Grade and Necrosis (SSIGN) score clear cell renal cell cancer

BACKGROUND: Despite using prognostic algorithms and standard surveillance guidelines, 17% of patients initially diagnosed with low risk clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) ultimately relapse and die of recurrent disease, indicating additional molecular parameters are needed for improved prognosi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: El Khoury, Louis Y., Fu, Shuang, Hlady, Ryan A., Wagner, Ryan T., Wang, Liguo, Eckel-Passow, Jeanette E., Castle, Erik P., Stanton, Melissa L., Thompson, R. Houston, Parker, Alexander S., Ho, Thai H., Robertson, Keith D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7814746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33461589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-020-00998-z
_version_ 1783638116413734912
author El Khoury, Louis Y.
Fu, Shuang
Hlady, Ryan A.
Wagner, Ryan T.
Wang, Liguo
Eckel-Passow, Jeanette E.
Castle, Erik P.
Stanton, Melissa L.
Thompson, R. Houston
Parker, Alexander S.
Ho, Thai H.
Robertson, Keith D.
author_facet El Khoury, Louis Y.
Fu, Shuang
Hlady, Ryan A.
Wagner, Ryan T.
Wang, Liguo
Eckel-Passow, Jeanette E.
Castle, Erik P.
Stanton, Melissa L.
Thompson, R. Houston
Parker, Alexander S.
Ho, Thai H.
Robertson, Keith D.
author_sort El Khoury, Louis Y.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite using prognostic algorithms and standard surveillance guidelines, 17% of patients initially diagnosed with low risk clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) ultimately relapse and die of recurrent disease, indicating additional molecular parameters are needed for improved prognosis. RESULTS: To address the gap in ccRCC prognostication in the lower risk population, we performed a genome-wide analysis for methylation signatures capable of distinguishing recurrent and non-recurrent ccRCCs within the subgroup classified as ‘low risk’ by the Mayo Clinic Stage, Size, Grade, and Necrosis score (SSIGN 0–3). This approach revealed that recurrent patients have globally hypermethylated tumors and differ in methylation significantly at 5929 CpGs. Differentially methylated CpGs (DMCpGs) were enriched in regulatory regions and genes modulating cell growth and invasion. A subset of DMCpGs stratified low SSIGN groups into high and low risk of recurrence in independent data sets, indicating that DNA methylation enhances the prognostic power of the SSIGN score. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports a global DNA hypermethylation in tumors of recurrent ccRCC patients. Furthermore, DMCpGs were capable of discriminating between aggressive and less aggressive tumors, in addition to SSIGN score. Therefore, DNA methylation presents itself as a potentially strong biomarker to further improve prognostic power in patients with low risk SSIGN score (0–3).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7814746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78147462021-01-21 Identification of DNA methylation signatures associated with poor outcome in lower-risk Stage, Size, Grade and Necrosis (SSIGN) score clear cell renal cell cancer El Khoury, Louis Y. Fu, Shuang Hlady, Ryan A. Wagner, Ryan T. Wang, Liguo Eckel-Passow, Jeanette E. Castle, Erik P. Stanton, Melissa L. Thompson, R. Houston Parker, Alexander S. Ho, Thai H. Robertson, Keith D. Clin Epigenetics Research BACKGROUND: Despite using prognostic algorithms and standard surveillance guidelines, 17% of patients initially diagnosed with low risk clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) ultimately relapse and die of recurrent disease, indicating additional molecular parameters are needed for improved prognosis. RESULTS: To address the gap in ccRCC prognostication in the lower risk population, we performed a genome-wide analysis for methylation signatures capable of distinguishing recurrent and non-recurrent ccRCCs within the subgroup classified as ‘low risk’ by the Mayo Clinic Stage, Size, Grade, and Necrosis score (SSIGN 0–3). This approach revealed that recurrent patients have globally hypermethylated tumors and differ in methylation significantly at 5929 CpGs. Differentially methylated CpGs (DMCpGs) were enriched in regulatory regions and genes modulating cell growth and invasion. A subset of DMCpGs stratified low SSIGN groups into high and low risk of recurrence in independent data sets, indicating that DNA methylation enhances the prognostic power of the SSIGN score. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports a global DNA hypermethylation in tumors of recurrent ccRCC patients. Furthermore, DMCpGs were capable of discriminating between aggressive and less aggressive tumors, in addition to SSIGN score. Therefore, DNA methylation presents itself as a potentially strong biomarker to further improve prognostic power in patients with low risk SSIGN score (0–3). BioMed Central 2021-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7814746/ /pubmed/33461589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-020-00998-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
El Khoury, Louis Y.
Fu, Shuang
Hlady, Ryan A.
Wagner, Ryan T.
Wang, Liguo
Eckel-Passow, Jeanette E.
Castle, Erik P.
Stanton, Melissa L.
Thompson, R. Houston
Parker, Alexander S.
Ho, Thai H.
Robertson, Keith D.
Identification of DNA methylation signatures associated with poor outcome in lower-risk Stage, Size, Grade and Necrosis (SSIGN) score clear cell renal cell cancer
title Identification of DNA methylation signatures associated with poor outcome in lower-risk Stage, Size, Grade and Necrosis (SSIGN) score clear cell renal cell cancer
title_full Identification of DNA methylation signatures associated with poor outcome in lower-risk Stage, Size, Grade and Necrosis (SSIGN) score clear cell renal cell cancer
title_fullStr Identification of DNA methylation signatures associated with poor outcome in lower-risk Stage, Size, Grade and Necrosis (SSIGN) score clear cell renal cell cancer
title_full_unstemmed Identification of DNA methylation signatures associated with poor outcome in lower-risk Stage, Size, Grade and Necrosis (SSIGN) score clear cell renal cell cancer
title_short Identification of DNA methylation signatures associated with poor outcome in lower-risk Stage, Size, Grade and Necrosis (SSIGN) score clear cell renal cell cancer
title_sort identification of dna methylation signatures associated with poor outcome in lower-risk stage, size, grade and necrosis (ssign) score clear cell renal cell cancer
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7814746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33461589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13148-020-00998-z
work_keys_str_mv AT elkhourylouisy identificationofdnamethylationsignaturesassociatedwithpooroutcomeinlowerriskstagesizegradeandnecrosisssignscoreclearcellrenalcellcancer
AT fushuang identificationofdnamethylationsignaturesassociatedwithpooroutcomeinlowerriskstagesizegradeandnecrosisssignscoreclearcellrenalcellcancer
AT hladyryana identificationofdnamethylationsignaturesassociatedwithpooroutcomeinlowerriskstagesizegradeandnecrosisssignscoreclearcellrenalcellcancer
AT wagnerryant identificationofdnamethylationsignaturesassociatedwithpooroutcomeinlowerriskstagesizegradeandnecrosisssignscoreclearcellrenalcellcancer
AT wangliguo identificationofdnamethylationsignaturesassociatedwithpooroutcomeinlowerriskstagesizegradeandnecrosisssignscoreclearcellrenalcellcancer
AT eckelpassowjeanettee identificationofdnamethylationsignaturesassociatedwithpooroutcomeinlowerriskstagesizegradeandnecrosisssignscoreclearcellrenalcellcancer
AT castleerikp identificationofdnamethylationsignaturesassociatedwithpooroutcomeinlowerriskstagesizegradeandnecrosisssignscoreclearcellrenalcellcancer
AT stantonmelissal identificationofdnamethylationsignaturesassociatedwithpooroutcomeinlowerriskstagesizegradeandnecrosisssignscoreclearcellrenalcellcancer
AT thompsonrhouston identificationofdnamethylationsignaturesassociatedwithpooroutcomeinlowerriskstagesizegradeandnecrosisssignscoreclearcellrenalcellcancer
AT parkeralexanders identificationofdnamethylationsignaturesassociatedwithpooroutcomeinlowerriskstagesizegradeandnecrosisssignscoreclearcellrenalcellcancer
AT hothaih identificationofdnamethylationsignaturesassociatedwithpooroutcomeinlowerriskstagesizegradeandnecrosisssignscoreclearcellrenalcellcancer
AT robertsonkeithd identificationofdnamethylationsignaturesassociatedwithpooroutcomeinlowerriskstagesizegradeandnecrosisssignscoreclearcellrenalcellcancer