Cargando…

Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 87460 × MON 89034 × 1507 × MON 87411 × 59122 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2017‐139)

Maize MON 87427 × MON 87460 × MON 89034 × 1507 × MON 87411 × 59122 (six‐event stack maize) was produced by conventional crossing to combine six single events: MON 87427, MON 87460, MON 89034, 1507, MON 87411 and 59122. The GMO Panel previously assessed the six single maize events and 17 of the subco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naegeli, Hanspeter, Bresson, Jean–Louis, Dalmay, Tamas, Dewhurst, Ian Crawford, Epstein, Michelle M, Firbank, Leslie George, Guerche, Philippe, Hejatko, Jan, Moreno, Francisco Javier, Mullins, Ewen, Nogué, Fabien, Rostoks, Nils, Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan, Savoini, Giovanni, Veromann, Eve, Veronesi, Fabio, Álvarez, Fernando, Ardizzone, Michele, De Sanctis, Giacomo, Fernandez, Antonio, Gennaro, Andrea, Gómez Ruiz, Jose Ángel, Kagkli, Dafni Maria, Lanzoni, Anna, Neri, Franco Maria, Papadopoulou, Nikoletta, Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos, Raffaello, Tommaso
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7814765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33505528
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6351
_version_ 1783638120936243200
author Naegeli, Hanspeter
Bresson, Jean–Louis
Dalmay, Tamas
Dewhurst, Ian Crawford
Epstein, Michelle M
Firbank, Leslie George
Guerche, Philippe
Hejatko, Jan
Moreno, Francisco Javier
Mullins, Ewen
Nogué, Fabien
Rostoks, Nils
Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan
Savoini, Giovanni
Veromann, Eve
Veronesi, Fabio
Álvarez, Fernando
Ardizzone, Michele
De Sanctis, Giacomo
Fernandez, Antonio
Gennaro, Andrea
Gómez Ruiz, Jose Ángel
Kagkli, Dafni Maria
Lanzoni, Anna
Neri, Franco Maria
Papadopoulou, Nikoletta
Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos
Raffaello, Tommaso
author_facet Naegeli, Hanspeter
Bresson, Jean–Louis
Dalmay, Tamas
Dewhurst, Ian Crawford
Epstein, Michelle M
Firbank, Leslie George
Guerche, Philippe
Hejatko, Jan
Moreno, Francisco Javier
Mullins, Ewen
Nogué, Fabien
Rostoks, Nils
Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan
Savoini, Giovanni
Veromann, Eve
Veronesi, Fabio
Álvarez, Fernando
Ardizzone, Michele
De Sanctis, Giacomo
Fernandez, Antonio
Gennaro, Andrea
Gómez Ruiz, Jose Ángel
Kagkli, Dafni Maria
Lanzoni, Anna
Neri, Franco Maria
Papadopoulou, Nikoletta
Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos
Raffaello, Tommaso
collection PubMed
description Maize MON 87427 × MON 87460 × MON 89034 × 1507 × MON 87411 × 59122 (six‐event stack maize) was produced by conventional crossing to combine six single events: MON 87427, MON 87460, MON 89034, 1507, MON 87411 and 59122. The GMO Panel previously assessed the six single maize events and 17 of the subcombinations and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single maize events or the 17 subcombinations were identified that could lead to modification of the original conclusions on their safety. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment indicate that the combination of the single maize events and of the newly expressed proteins and dsRNA in the six‐event stack maize does not give rise to food and feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that the six‐event stack maize, as described in this application, is as safe as its non‐GM comparator and the selected non‐GM reference varieties. In the case of accidental release of viable grains of the six‐event stack maize into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The GMO Panel assessed the likelihood of interactions among the single events in the 39 maize subcombinations not previously assessed and concludes that these are expected to be as safe as the single events, the previously assessed subcombinations and the six–event stack maize. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of the six‐event stack maize. Post‐market monitoring of food/feed is not considered necessary. The GMO Panel concludes that the six‐event stack maize and its subcombinations are as safe as the non‐GM comparator and the selected non‐GM reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7814765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78147652021-01-26 Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 87460 × MON 89034 × 1507 × MON 87411 × 59122 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2017‐139) Naegeli, Hanspeter Bresson, Jean–Louis Dalmay, Tamas Dewhurst, Ian Crawford Epstein, Michelle M Firbank, Leslie George Guerche, Philippe Hejatko, Jan Moreno, Francisco Javier Mullins, Ewen Nogué, Fabien Rostoks, Nils Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan Savoini, Giovanni Veromann, Eve Veronesi, Fabio Álvarez, Fernando Ardizzone, Michele De Sanctis, Giacomo Fernandez, Antonio Gennaro, Andrea Gómez Ruiz, Jose Ángel Kagkli, Dafni Maria Lanzoni, Anna Neri, Franco Maria Papadopoulou, Nikoletta Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos Raffaello, Tommaso EFSA J Scientific Opinion Maize MON 87427 × MON 87460 × MON 89034 × 1507 × MON 87411 × 59122 (six‐event stack maize) was produced by conventional crossing to combine six single events: MON 87427, MON 87460, MON 89034, 1507, MON 87411 and 59122. The GMO Panel previously assessed the six single maize events and 17 of the subcombinations and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single maize events or the 17 subcombinations were identified that could lead to modification of the original conclusions on their safety. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment indicate that the combination of the single maize events and of the newly expressed proteins and dsRNA in the six‐event stack maize does not give rise to food and feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that the six‐event stack maize, as described in this application, is as safe as its non‐GM comparator and the selected non‐GM reference varieties. In the case of accidental release of viable grains of the six‐event stack maize into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The GMO Panel assessed the likelihood of interactions among the single events in the 39 maize subcombinations not previously assessed and concludes that these are expected to be as safe as the single events, the previously assessed subcombinations and the six–event stack maize. The post‐market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of the six‐event stack maize. Post‐market monitoring of food/feed is not considered necessary. The GMO Panel concludes that the six‐event stack maize and its subcombinations are as safe as the non‐GM comparator and the selected non‐GM reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7814765/ /pubmed/33505528 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6351 Text en © 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Naegeli, Hanspeter
Bresson, Jean–Louis
Dalmay, Tamas
Dewhurst, Ian Crawford
Epstein, Michelle M
Firbank, Leslie George
Guerche, Philippe
Hejatko, Jan
Moreno, Francisco Javier
Mullins, Ewen
Nogué, Fabien
Rostoks, Nils
Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan
Savoini, Giovanni
Veromann, Eve
Veronesi, Fabio
Álvarez, Fernando
Ardizzone, Michele
De Sanctis, Giacomo
Fernandez, Antonio
Gennaro, Andrea
Gómez Ruiz, Jose Ángel
Kagkli, Dafni Maria
Lanzoni, Anna
Neri, Franco Maria
Papadopoulou, Nikoletta
Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos
Raffaello, Tommaso
Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 87460 × MON 89034 × 1507 × MON 87411 × 59122 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2017‐139)
title Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 87460 × MON 89034 × 1507 × MON 87411 × 59122 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2017‐139)
title_full Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 87460 × MON 89034 × 1507 × MON 87411 × 59122 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2017‐139)
title_fullStr Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 87460 × MON 89034 × 1507 × MON 87411 × 59122 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2017‐139)
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 87460 × MON 89034 × 1507 × MON 87411 × 59122 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2017‐139)
title_short Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 87460 × MON 89034 × 1507 × MON 87411 × 59122 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2017‐139)
title_sort assessment of genetically modified maize mon 87427 × mon 87460 × mon 89034 × 1507 × mon 87411 × 59122 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under regulation (ec) no 1829/2003 (application efsa‐gmo‐nl‐2017‐139)
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7814765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33505528
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6351
work_keys_str_mv AT assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon890341507mon8741159122andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2017139
AT naegelihanspeter assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon890341507mon8741159122andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2017139
AT bressonjeanlouis assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon890341507mon8741159122andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2017139
AT dalmaytamas assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon890341507mon8741159122andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2017139
AT dewhurstiancrawford assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon890341507mon8741159122andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2017139
AT epsteinmichellem assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon890341507mon8741159122andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2017139
AT firbanklesliegeorge assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon890341507mon8741159122andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2017139
AT guerchephilippe assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon890341507mon8741159122andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2017139
AT hejatkojan assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon890341507mon8741159122andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2017139
AT morenofranciscojavier assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon890341507mon8741159122andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2017139
AT mullinsewen assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon890341507mon8741159122andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2017139
AT noguefabien assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon890341507mon8741159122andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2017139
AT rostoksnils assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon890341507mon8741159122andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2017139
AT sanchezserranojosejuan assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon890341507mon8741159122andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2017139
AT savoinigiovanni assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon890341507mon8741159122andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2017139
AT veromanneve assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon890341507mon8741159122andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2017139
AT veronesifabio assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon890341507mon8741159122andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2017139
AT alvarezfernando assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon890341507mon8741159122andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2017139
AT ardizzonemichele assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon890341507mon8741159122andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2017139
AT desanctisgiacomo assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon890341507mon8741159122andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2017139
AT fernandezantonio assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon890341507mon8741159122andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2017139
AT gennaroandrea assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon890341507mon8741159122andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2017139
AT gomezruizjoseangel assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon890341507mon8741159122andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2017139
AT kagklidafnimaria assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon890341507mon8741159122andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2017139
AT lanzonianna assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon890341507mon8741159122andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2017139
AT nerifrancomaria assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon890341507mon8741159122andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2017139
AT papadopoulounikoletta assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon890341507mon8741159122andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2017139
AT paraskevopouloskonstantinos assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon890341507mon8741159122andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2017139
AT raffaellotommaso assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizemon87427mon87460mon890341507mon8741159122andsubcombinationsforfoodandfeedusesunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmonl2017139