Cargando…
Aerosolisation in endonasal endoscopic pituitary surgery
PURPOSE: To determine the particle size, concentration, airborne duration and spread during endoscopic endonasal pituitary surgery in actual patients in a theatre setting. METHODS: This observational study recruited a convenience sample of three patients. Procedures were performed in a positive pres...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7814858/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33469830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11102-021-01125-8 |
_version_ | 1783638130128060416 |
---|---|
author | Dhillon, Rana S. Nguyen, Lana V. Rowin, Wagih Abu Humphries, Ruhi S. Kevin, Kevin Ward, Jason D. Yule, Andrew Phan, Tuong D. Zhao, Yi Chen Wynne, David McNeill, Peter M. Hutchins, Nicholas Scott, David A. |
author_facet | Dhillon, Rana S. Nguyen, Lana V. Rowin, Wagih Abu Humphries, Ruhi S. Kevin, Kevin Ward, Jason D. Yule, Andrew Phan, Tuong D. Zhao, Yi Chen Wynne, David McNeill, Peter M. Hutchins, Nicholas Scott, David A. |
author_sort | Dhillon, Rana S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To determine the particle size, concentration, airborne duration and spread during endoscopic endonasal pituitary surgery in actual patients in a theatre setting. METHODS: This observational study recruited a convenience sample of three patients. Procedures were performed in a positive pressure operating room. Particle image velocimetry and spectrometry with air sampling were used for aerosol detection. RESULTS: Intubation and extubation generated small particles (< 5 µm) in mean concentrations 12 times greater than background noise (p < 0.001). The mean particle concentrations during endonasal access were 4.5 times greater than background (p = 0.01). Particles were typically large (> 75 µm), remained airborne for up to 10 s and travelled up to 1.1 m. Use of a microdebrider generated mean aerosol concentrations 18 times above baseline (p = 0.005). High-speed drilling did not produce aerosols greater than baseline. Pituitary tumour resection generated mean aerosol concentrations less than background (p = 0.18). Surgical drape removal generated small and large particles in mean concentrations 6.4 times greater than background (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Intubation and extubation generate large amounts of small particles that remain suspended in air for long durations and disperse through theatre. Endonasal access and pituitary tumour resection generate smaller concentrations of larger particles which are airborne for shorter periods and travel shorter distances. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7814858 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78148582021-01-21 Aerosolisation in endonasal endoscopic pituitary surgery Dhillon, Rana S. Nguyen, Lana V. Rowin, Wagih Abu Humphries, Ruhi S. Kevin, Kevin Ward, Jason D. Yule, Andrew Phan, Tuong D. Zhao, Yi Chen Wynne, David McNeill, Peter M. Hutchins, Nicholas Scott, David A. Pituitary Article PURPOSE: To determine the particle size, concentration, airborne duration and spread during endoscopic endonasal pituitary surgery in actual patients in a theatre setting. METHODS: This observational study recruited a convenience sample of three patients. Procedures were performed in a positive pressure operating room. Particle image velocimetry and spectrometry with air sampling were used for aerosol detection. RESULTS: Intubation and extubation generated small particles (< 5 µm) in mean concentrations 12 times greater than background noise (p < 0.001). The mean particle concentrations during endonasal access were 4.5 times greater than background (p = 0.01). Particles were typically large (> 75 µm), remained airborne for up to 10 s and travelled up to 1.1 m. Use of a microdebrider generated mean aerosol concentrations 18 times above baseline (p = 0.005). High-speed drilling did not produce aerosols greater than baseline. Pituitary tumour resection generated mean aerosol concentrations less than background (p = 0.18). Surgical drape removal generated small and large particles in mean concentrations 6.4 times greater than background (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Intubation and extubation generate large amounts of small particles that remain suspended in air for long durations and disperse through theatre. Endonasal access and pituitary tumour resection generate smaller concentrations of larger particles which are airborne for shorter periods and travel shorter distances. Springer US 2021-01-19 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7814858/ /pubmed/33469830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11102-021-01125-8 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Article Dhillon, Rana S. Nguyen, Lana V. Rowin, Wagih Abu Humphries, Ruhi S. Kevin, Kevin Ward, Jason D. Yule, Andrew Phan, Tuong D. Zhao, Yi Chen Wynne, David McNeill, Peter M. Hutchins, Nicholas Scott, David A. Aerosolisation in endonasal endoscopic pituitary surgery |
title | Aerosolisation in endonasal endoscopic pituitary surgery |
title_full | Aerosolisation in endonasal endoscopic pituitary surgery |
title_fullStr | Aerosolisation in endonasal endoscopic pituitary surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Aerosolisation in endonasal endoscopic pituitary surgery |
title_short | Aerosolisation in endonasal endoscopic pituitary surgery |
title_sort | aerosolisation in endonasal endoscopic pituitary surgery |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7814858/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33469830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11102-021-01125-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dhillonranas aerosolisationinendonasalendoscopicpituitarysurgery AT nguyenlanav aerosolisationinendonasalendoscopicpituitarysurgery AT rowinwagihabu aerosolisationinendonasalendoscopicpituitarysurgery AT humphriesruhis aerosolisationinendonasalendoscopicpituitarysurgery AT kevinkevin aerosolisationinendonasalendoscopicpituitarysurgery AT wardjasond aerosolisationinendonasalendoscopicpituitarysurgery AT yuleandrew aerosolisationinendonasalendoscopicpituitarysurgery AT phantuongd aerosolisationinendonasalendoscopicpituitarysurgery AT zhaoyichen aerosolisationinendonasalendoscopicpituitarysurgery AT wynnedavid aerosolisationinendonasalendoscopicpituitarysurgery AT mcneillpeterm aerosolisationinendonasalendoscopicpituitarysurgery AT hutchinsnicholas aerosolisationinendonasalendoscopicpituitarysurgery AT scottdavida aerosolisationinendonasalendoscopicpituitarysurgery |