Cargando…

A randomised double-blind trial of minimal bolus doses of oxytocin for elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia: Optimal or not?

BACKGROUND: Oxytocin administration regimens are arbitrary and highly subjective. Hence, it is essential to reinvestigate the appropriate dose for effective uterine contraction with minimal bleeding and adverse effects. AIM: To determine the optimal dose of bolus oxytocin for uterine contractions fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joseph, Joe, George, Sagiev Koshy, Daniel, Mary, Ranjan, R V
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7815013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33487681
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_377_20
_version_ 1783638151511670784
author Joseph, Joe
George, Sagiev Koshy
Daniel, Mary
Ranjan, R V
author_facet Joseph, Joe
George, Sagiev Koshy
Daniel, Mary
Ranjan, R V
author_sort Joseph, Joe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Oxytocin administration regimens are arbitrary and highly subjective. Hence, it is essential to reinvestigate the appropriate dose for effective uterine contraction with minimal bleeding and adverse effects. AIM: To determine the optimal dose of bolus oxytocin for uterine contractions for elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. METHODS: Ninety term mothers (37 to 41 weeks) undergoing caesarean section electively under spinal anaesthesia were considered for the trial and divided into three groups to receive oxytocin bolus of one, two or three units. The uterine tone was assessed at 2 min after oxytocin administration. Intraoperative blood loss, mean arterial pressure, heart rate and possible side effects were also compared. Paired t-test, Kruskal-Wallis test, Chi-square test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) test with Scheffe multiple comparisons were used as inferential statistics. RESULTS: Adequate uterine contraction was seen in 66% of participants who received one unit of oxytocin, and in 83.3% of participants who received two units of oxytocin. All those who received three units of oxytocin had an adequate uterine contraction. Blood loss was inversely related to the bolus dose of oxytocin. CONCLUSIONS: Lower bolus oxytocin doses of one and two units were inadequate for uterine contraction at elective caeserean section, while three units appeared to be effective in terms of adequate uterine contraction, reduced blood loss and stable haemodynamic system and absent side effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7815013
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78150132021-01-22 A randomised double-blind trial of minimal bolus doses of oxytocin for elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia: Optimal or not? Joseph, Joe George, Sagiev Koshy Daniel, Mary Ranjan, R V Indian J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND: Oxytocin administration regimens are arbitrary and highly subjective. Hence, it is essential to reinvestigate the appropriate dose for effective uterine contraction with minimal bleeding and adverse effects. AIM: To determine the optimal dose of bolus oxytocin for uterine contractions for elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. METHODS: Ninety term mothers (37 to 41 weeks) undergoing caesarean section electively under spinal anaesthesia were considered for the trial and divided into three groups to receive oxytocin bolus of one, two or three units. The uterine tone was assessed at 2 min after oxytocin administration. Intraoperative blood loss, mean arterial pressure, heart rate and possible side effects were also compared. Paired t-test, Kruskal-Wallis test, Chi-square test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) test with Scheffe multiple comparisons were used as inferential statistics. RESULTS: Adequate uterine contraction was seen in 66% of participants who received one unit of oxytocin, and in 83.3% of participants who received two units of oxytocin. All those who received three units of oxytocin had an adequate uterine contraction. Blood loss was inversely related to the bolus dose of oxytocin. CONCLUSIONS: Lower bolus oxytocin doses of one and two units were inadequate for uterine contraction at elective caeserean section, while three units appeared to be effective in terms of adequate uterine contraction, reduced blood loss and stable haemodynamic system and absent side effects. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-11 2020-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7815013/ /pubmed/33487681 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_377_20 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Joseph, Joe
George, Sagiev Koshy
Daniel, Mary
Ranjan, R V
A randomised double-blind trial of minimal bolus doses of oxytocin for elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia: Optimal or not?
title A randomised double-blind trial of minimal bolus doses of oxytocin for elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia: Optimal or not?
title_full A randomised double-blind trial of minimal bolus doses of oxytocin for elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia: Optimal or not?
title_fullStr A randomised double-blind trial of minimal bolus doses of oxytocin for elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia: Optimal or not?
title_full_unstemmed A randomised double-blind trial of minimal bolus doses of oxytocin for elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia: Optimal or not?
title_short A randomised double-blind trial of minimal bolus doses of oxytocin for elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia: Optimal or not?
title_sort randomised double-blind trial of minimal bolus doses of oxytocin for elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia: optimal or not?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7815013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33487681
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_377_20
work_keys_str_mv AT josephjoe arandomiseddoubleblindtrialofminimalbolusdosesofoxytocinforelectivecaesareansectionunderspinalanaesthesiaoptimalornot
AT georgesagievkoshy arandomiseddoubleblindtrialofminimalbolusdosesofoxytocinforelectivecaesareansectionunderspinalanaesthesiaoptimalornot
AT danielmary arandomiseddoubleblindtrialofminimalbolusdosesofoxytocinforelectivecaesareansectionunderspinalanaesthesiaoptimalornot
AT ranjanrv arandomiseddoubleblindtrialofminimalbolusdosesofoxytocinforelectivecaesareansectionunderspinalanaesthesiaoptimalornot
AT josephjoe randomiseddoubleblindtrialofminimalbolusdosesofoxytocinforelectivecaesareansectionunderspinalanaesthesiaoptimalornot
AT georgesagievkoshy randomiseddoubleblindtrialofminimalbolusdosesofoxytocinforelectivecaesareansectionunderspinalanaesthesiaoptimalornot
AT danielmary randomiseddoubleblindtrialofminimalbolusdosesofoxytocinforelectivecaesareansectionunderspinalanaesthesiaoptimalornot
AT ranjanrv randomiseddoubleblindtrialofminimalbolusdosesofoxytocinforelectivecaesareansectionunderspinalanaesthesiaoptimalornot