Cargando…
Public support for restoration: Does including ecosystem services as a goal engage a different set of values and attitudes than biodiversity protection alone?
The ecosystem services concept has come into wide use in conservation and natural resource management, partly due to its appeal as an anthropocentric rationale for protecting and restoring nature. Proponents of the ecosystem services concept expect that presenting these arguments alongside biodivers...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7815106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33465097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245074 |
_version_ | 1783638169838682112 |
---|---|
author | Matzek, Virginia Wilson, Kerrie A. |
author_facet | Matzek, Virginia Wilson, Kerrie A. |
author_sort | Matzek, Virginia |
collection | PubMed |
description | The ecosystem services concept has come into wide use in conservation and natural resource management, partly due to its appeal as an anthropocentric rationale for protecting and restoring nature. Proponents of the ecosystem services concept expect that presenting these arguments alongside biodiversity arguments should lead to a broader base of support for conservation. This raises the question of whether support for activities that ensure ecosystem service provision relates to different sets of core values, or environmental attitudes, than support for biodiversity protection. We surveyed adult Australians to evaluate the influence of values and attitudes on willingness to pay for different habitat restoration outcomes. We hypothesized that when restoration is framed with an anthropocentric rationale (such as ecosystem service provision), support for restoration would align more strongly with anthropocentric or self-centered values and attitudes. Specifically, we tested if preference for ecosystem service benefits over biodiversity attributes, as indicated by willingness to pay in different restoration scenarios, is more strongly associated with self-enhancing (Egoistic) than self-transcending (Altruistic and Biospheric) values, and more associated with a pro-use attitude towards nature (Utilization) than an anti-use attitude (Preservation). We found that support for habitat restoration is generally based on ecocentric values and attitudes, but that positive associations between pro-environmental behavior and Egoistic values emerge when emphasis is placed on ecosystem service outcomes. Individuals scoring higher on Egoistic/Utilization metrics were also more likely to anticipate disservices from restoration. Attitudes predicted behavioral intention (willingness to pay) better than core values. Our results support the notion that the ecosystem services concept garners nontraditional backers and broadens the appeal of ecological restoration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7815106 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78151062021-01-27 Public support for restoration: Does including ecosystem services as a goal engage a different set of values and attitudes than biodiversity protection alone? Matzek, Virginia Wilson, Kerrie A. PLoS One Research Article The ecosystem services concept has come into wide use in conservation and natural resource management, partly due to its appeal as an anthropocentric rationale for protecting and restoring nature. Proponents of the ecosystem services concept expect that presenting these arguments alongside biodiversity arguments should lead to a broader base of support for conservation. This raises the question of whether support for activities that ensure ecosystem service provision relates to different sets of core values, or environmental attitudes, than support for biodiversity protection. We surveyed adult Australians to evaluate the influence of values and attitudes on willingness to pay for different habitat restoration outcomes. We hypothesized that when restoration is framed with an anthropocentric rationale (such as ecosystem service provision), support for restoration would align more strongly with anthropocentric or self-centered values and attitudes. Specifically, we tested if preference for ecosystem service benefits over biodiversity attributes, as indicated by willingness to pay in different restoration scenarios, is more strongly associated with self-enhancing (Egoistic) than self-transcending (Altruistic and Biospheric) values, and more associated with a pro-use attitude towards nature (Utilization) than an anti-use attitude (Preservation). We found that support for habitat restoration is generally based on ecocentric values and attitudes, but that positive associations between pro-environmental behavior and Egoistic values emerge when emphasis is placed on ecosystem service outcomes. Individuals scoring higher on Egoistic/Utilization metrics were also more likely to anticipate disservices from restoration. Attitudes predicted behavioral intention (willingness to pay) better than core values. Our results support the notion that the ecosystem services concept garners nontraditional backers and broadens the appeal of ecological restoration. Public Library of Science 2021-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7815106/ /pubmed/33465097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245074 Text en © 2021 Matzek, Wilson http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Matzek, Virginia Wilson, Kerrie A. Public support for restoration: Does including ecosystem services as a goal engage a different set of values and attitudes than biodiversity protection alone? |
title | Public support for restoration: Does including ecosystem services as a goal engage a different set of values and attitudes than biodiversity protection alone? |
title_full | Public support for restoration: Does including ecosystem services as a goal engage a different set of values and attitudes than biodiversity protection alone? |
title_fullStr | Public support for restoration: Does including ecosystem services as a goal engage a different set of values and attitudes than biodiversity protection alone? |
title_full_unstemmed | Public support for restoration: Does including ecosystem services as a goal engage a different set of values and attitudes than biodiversity protection alone? |
title_short | Public support for restoration: Does including ecosystem services as a goal engage a different set of values and attitudes than biodiversity protection alone? |
title_sort | public support for restoration: does including ecosystem services as a goal engage a different set of values and attitudes than biodiversity protection alone? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7815106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33465097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245074 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matzekvirginia publicsupportforrestorationdoesincludingecosystemservicesasagoalengageadifferentsetofvaluesandattitudesthanbiodiversityprotectionalone AT wilsonkerriea publicsupportforrestorationdoesincludingecosystemservicesasagoalengageadifferentsetofvaluesandattitudesthanbiodiversityprotectionalone |