Cargando…

Public support for restoration: Does including ecosystem services as a goal engage a different set of values and attitudes than biodiversity protection alone?

The ecosystem services concept has come into wide use in conservation and natural resource management, partly due to its appeal as an anthropocentric rationale for protecting and restoring nature. Proponents of the ecosystem services concept expect that presenting these arguments alongside biodivers...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matzek, Virginia, Wilson, Kerrie A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7815106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33465097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245074
_version_ 1783638169838682112
author Matzek, Virginia
Wilson, Kerrie A.
author_facet Matzek, Virginia
Wilson, Kerrie A.
author_sort Matzek, Virginia
collection PubMed
description The ecosystem services concept has come into wide use in conservation and natural resource management, partly due to its appeal as an anthropocentric rationale for protecting and restoring nature. Proponents of the ecosystem services concept expect that presenting these arguments alongside biodiversity arguments should lead to a broader base of support for conservation. This raises the question of whether support for activities that ensure ecosystem service provision relates to different sets of core values, or environmental attitudes, than support for biodiversity protection. We surveyed adult Australians to evaluate the influence of values and attitudes on willingness to pay for different habitat restoration outcomes. We hypothesized that when restoration is framed with an anthropocentric rationale (such as ecosystem service provision), support for restoration would align more strongly with anthropocentric or self-centered values and attitudes. Specifically, we tested if preference for ecosystem service benefits over biodiversity attributes, as indicated by willingness to pay in different restoration scenarios, is more strongly associated with self-enhancing (Egoistic) than self-transcending (Altruistic and Biospheric) values, and more associated with a pro-use attitude towards nature (Utilization) than an anti-use attitude (Preservation). We found that support for habitat restoration is generally based on ecocentric values and attitudes, but that positive associations between pro-environmental behavior and Egoistic values emerge when emphasis is placed on ecosystem service outcomes. Individuals scoring higher on Egoistic/Utilization metrics were also more likely to anticipate disservices from restoration. Attitudes predicted behavioral intention (willingness to pay) better than core values. Our results support the notion that the ecosystem services concept garners nontraditional backers and broadens the appeal of ecological restoration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7815106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78151062021-01-27 Public support for restoration: Does including ecosystem services as a goal engage a different set of values and attitudes than biodiversity protection alone? Matzek, Virginia Wilson, Kerrie A. PLoS One Research Article The ecosystem services concept has come into wide use in conservation and natural resource management, partly due to its appeal as an anthropocentric rationale for protecting and restoring nature. Proponents of the ecosystem services concept expect that presenting these arguments alongside biodiversity arguments should lead to a broader base of support for conservation. This raises the question of whether support for activities that ensure ecosystem service provision relates to different sets of core values, or environmental attitudes, than support for biodiversity protection. We surveyed adult Australians to evaluate the influence of values and attitudes on willingness to pay for different habitat restoration outcomes. We hypothesized that when restoration is framed with an anthropocentric rationale (such as ecosystem service provision), support for restoration would align more strongly with anthropocentric or self-centered values and attitudes. Specifically, we tested if preference for ecosystem service benefits over biodiversity attributes, as indicated by willingness to pay in different restoration scenarios, is more strongly associated with self-enhancing (Egoistic) than self-transcending (Altruistic and Biospheric) values, and more associated with a pro-use attitude towards nature (Utilization) than an anti-use attitude (Preservation). We found that support for habitat restoration is generally based on ecocentric values and attitudes, but that positive associations between pro-environmental behavior and Egoistic values emerge when emphasis is placed on ecosystem service outcomes. Individuals scoring higher on Egoistic/Utilization metrics were also more likely to anticipate disservices from restoration. Attitudes predicted behavioral intention (willingness to pay) better than core values. Our results support the notion that the ecosystem services concept garners nontraditional backers and broadens the appeal of ecological restoration. Public Library of Science 2021-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7815106/ /pubmed/33465097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245074 Text en © 2021 Matzek, Wilson http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Matzek, Virginia
Wilson, Kerrie A.
Public support for restoration: Does including ecosystem services as a goal engage a different set of values and attitudes than biodiversity protection alone?
title Public support for restoration: Does including ecosystem services as a goal engage a different set of values and attitudes than biodiversity protection alone?
title_full Public support for restoration: Does including ecosystem services as a goal engage a different set of values and attitudes than biodiversity protection alone?
title_fullStr Public support for restoration: Does including ecosystem services as a goal engage a different set of values and attitudes than biodiversity protection alone?
title_full_unstemmed Public support for restoration: Does including ecosystem services as a goal engage a different set of values and attitudes than biodiversity protection alone?
title_short Public support for restoration: Does including ecosystem services as a goal engage a different set of values and attitudes than biodiversity protection alone?
title_sort public support for restoration: does including ecosystem services as a goal engage a different set of values and attitudes than biodiversity protection alone?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7815106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33465097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245074
work_keys_str_mv AT matzekvirginia publicsupportforrestorationdoesincludingecosystemservicesasagoalengageadifferentsetofvaluesandattitudesthanbiodiversityprotectionalone
AT wilsonkerriea publicsupportforrestorationdoesincludingecosystemservicesasagoalengageadifferentsetofvaluesandattitudesthanbiodiversityprotectionalone