Cargando…

A comparison of machine learning models versus clinical evaluation for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis

INTRODUCTION: Patients with sepsis who present to an emergency department (ED) have highly variable underlying disease severity, and can be categorized from low to high risk. Development of a risk stratification tool for these patients is important for appropriate triage and early treatment. The aim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Doorn, William P. T. M., Stassen, Patricia M., Borggreve, Hella F., Schalkwijk, Maaike J., Stoffers, Judith, Bekers, Otto, Meex, Steven J. R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7815112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33465096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245157
_version_ 1783638171265794048
author van Doorn, William P. T. M.
Stassen, Patricia M.
Borggreve, Hella F.
Schalkwijk, Maaike J.
Stoffers, Judith
Bekers, Otto
Meex, Steven J. R.
author_facet van Doorn, William P. T. M.
Stassen, Patricia M.
Borggreve, Hella F.
Schalkwijk, Maaike J.
Stoffers, Judith
Bekers, Otto
Meex, Steven J. R.
author_sort van Doorn, William P. T. M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Patients with sepsis who present to an emergency department (ED) have highly variable underlying disease severity, and can be categorized from low to high risk. Development of a risk stratification tool for these patients is important for appropriate triage and early treatment. The aim of this study was to develop machine learning models predicting 31-day mortality in patients presenting to the ED with sepsis and to compare these to internal medicine physicians and clinical risk scores. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted amongst 1,344 emergency department patients fulfilling sepsis criteria. Laboratory and clinical data that was available in the first two hours of presentation from these patients were randomly partitioned into a development (n = 1,244) and validation dataset (n = 100). Machine learning models were trained and evaluated on the development dataset and compared to internal medicine physicians and risk scores in the independent validation dataset. The primary outcome was 31-day mortality. RESULTS: A number of 1,344 patients were included of whom 174 (13.0%) died. Machine learning models trained with laboratory or a combination of laboratory + clinical data achieved an area-under-the ROC curve of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.80–0.84) and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.81–0.87) for predicting 31-day mortality, respectively. In the validation set, models outperformed internal medicine physicians and clinical risk scores in sensitivity (92% vs. 72% vs. 78%;p<0.001,all comparisons) while retaining comparable specificity (78% vs. 74% vs. 72%;p>0.02). The model had higher diagnostic accuracy with an area-under-the-ROC curve of 0.85 (95%CI: 0.78–0.92) compared to abbMEDS (0.63,0.54–0.73), mREMS (0.63,0.54–0.72) and internal medicine physicians (0.74,0.65–0.82). CONCLUSION: Machine learning models outperformed internal medicine physicians and clinical risk scores in predicting 31-day mortality. These models are a promising tool to aid in risk stratification of patients presenting to the ED with sepsis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7815112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78151122021-01-27 A comparison of machine learning models versus clinical evaluation for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis van Doorn, William P. T. M. Stassen, Patricia M. Borggreve, Hella F. Schalkwijk, Maaike J. Stoffers, Judith Bekers, Otto Meex, Steven J. R. PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Patients with sepsis who present to an emergency department (ED) have highly variable underlying disease severity, and can be categorized from low to high risk. Development of a risk stratification tool for these patients is important for appropriate triage and early treatment. The aim of this study was to develop machine learning models predicting 31-day mortality in patients presenting to the ED with sepsis and to compare these to internal medicine physicians and clinical risk scores. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted amongst 1,344 emergency department patients fulfilling sepsis criteria. Laboratory and clinical data that was available in the first two hours of presentation from these patients were randomly partitioned into a development (n = 1,244) and validation dataset (n = 100). Machine learning models were trained and evaluated on the development dataset and compared to internal medicine physicians and risk scores in the independent validation dataset. The primary outcome was 31-day mortality. RESULTS: A number of 1,344 patients were included of whom 174 (13.0%) died. Machine learning models trained with laboratory or a combination of laboratory + clinical data achieved an area-under-the ROC curve of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.80–0.84) and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.81–0.87) for predicting 31-day mortality, respectively. In the validation set, models outperformed internal medicine physicians and clinical risk scores in sensitivity (92% vs. 72% vs. 78%;p<0.001,all comparisons) while retaining comparable specificity (78% vs. 74% vs. 72%;p>0.02). The model had higher diagnostic accuracy with an area-under-the-ROC curve of 0.85 (95%CI: 0.78–0.92) compared to abbMEDS (0.63,0.54–0.73), mREMS (0.63,0.54–0.72) and internal medicine physicians (0.74,0.65–0.82). CONCLUSION: Machine learning models outperformed internal medicine physicians and clinical risk scores in predicting 31-day mortality. These models are a promising tool to aid in risk stratification of patients presenting to the ED with sepsis. Public Library of Science 2021-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7815112/ /pubmed/33465096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245157 Text en © 2021 van Doorn et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
van Doorn, William P. T. M.
Stassen, Patricia M.
Borggreve, Hella F.
Schalkwijk, Maaike J.
Stoffers, Judith
Bekers, Otto
Meex, Steven J. R.
A comparison of machine learning models versus clinical evaluation for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis
title A comparison of machine learning models versus clinical evaluation for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis
title_full A comparison of machine learning models versus clinical evaluation for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis
title_fullStr A comparison of machine learning models versus clinical evaluation for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of machine learning models versus clinical evaluation for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis
title_short A comparison of machine learning models versus clinical evaluation for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis
title_sort comparison of machine learning models versus clinical evaluation for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7815112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33465096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245157
work_keys_str_mv AT vandoornwilliamptm acomparisonofmachinelearningmodelsversusclinicalevaluationformortalitypredictioninpatientswithsepsis
AT stassenpatriciam acomparisonofmachinelearningmodelsversusclinicalevaluationformortalitypredictioninpatientswithsepsis
AT borggrevehellaf acomparisonofmachinelearningmodelsversusclinicalevaluationformortalitypredictioninpatientswithsepsis
AT schalkwijkmaaikej acomparisonofmachinelearningmodelsversusclinicalevaluationformortalitypredictioninpatientswithsepsis
AT stoffersjudith acomparisonofmachinelearningmodelsversusclinicalevaluationformortalitypredictioninpatientswithsepsis
AT bekersotto acomparisonofmachinelearningmodelsversusclinicalevaluationformortalitypredictioninpatientswithsepsis
AT meexstevenjr acomparisonofmachinelearningmodelsversusclinicalevaluationformortalitypredictioninpatientswithsepsis
AT vandoornwilliamptm comparisonofmachinelearningmodelsversusclinicalevaluationformortalitypredictioninpatientswithsepsis
AT stassenpatriciam comparisonofmachinelearningmodelsversusclinicalevaluationformortalitypredictioninpatientswithsepsis
AT borggrevehellaf comparisonofmachinelearningmodelsversusclinicalevaluationformortalitypredictioninpatientswithsepsis
AT schalkwijkmaaikej comparisonofmachinelearningmodelsversusclinicalevaluationformortalitypredictioninpatientswithsepsis
AT stoffersjudith comparisonofmachinelearningmodelsversusclinicalevaluationformortalitypredictioninpatientswithsepsis
AT bekersotto comparisonofmachinelearningmodelsversusclinicalevaluationformortalitypredictioninpatientswithsepsis
AT meexstevenjr comparisonofmachinelearningmodelsversusclinicalevaluationformortalitypredictioninpatientswithsepsis