Cargando…

Evaluation of Conjunctival Autografting Augmented with Mitomycin C Application versus Ologen Implantation in the Surgical Treatment of Recurrent Pterygium

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of augmenting conjunctival autografting with intraoperative mitomycin C (MMC) application versus Ologen implantation in the management of recurrent pterygium. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective randomised study included 63 eyes of 63 patients, wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wagdy, Faried M., Farahat, Hassan G., Ellakwa, Amin F., Mandour, Sameh S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7815381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33505715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8820926
_version_ 1783638218075275264
author Wagdy, Faried M.
Farahat, Hassan G.
Ellakwa, Amin F.
Mandour, Sameh S.
author_facet Wagdy, Faried M.
Farahat, Hassan G.
Ellakwa, Amin F.
Mandour, Sameh S.
author_sort Wagdy, Faried M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of augmenting conjunctival autografting with intraoperative mitomycin C (MMC) application versus Ologen implantation in the management of recurrent pterygium. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective randomised study included 63 eyes of 63 patients, with recurrent nasal pterygium, who presented to the outpatient clinic of Menoufia University Hospital in Shebin El Kom and Manshiet Soltan from January 2016 to December 2019. Patients were randomly enrolled into two groups. Group A included 32 eyes of 32 patients who underwent conjunctival autografting augmented with the topical application of MMC (0.2 mg/mL), and group B included 31 eyes of 31 patients who underwent conjunctival autografting augmented with Ologen implantation. All the patients underwent follow-up examinations for a period of 24 months. During each visit, a complete ophthalmic examination was performed. Pterygium regrowth of 1 mm or more, over the cornea, was considered a recurrence. RESULTS: In the MMC group, no recurrence was reported during the 24-month follow-up period. In the Ologen implantation group, recurrence was reported in 2 (8%) eyes. The time interval from surgery to recurrence was 5 months in one case and 8 months in the other. No other serious postoperative complications were reported, and there was no statistically significant difference between the groups in this regard. CONCLUSION: Ologen implantation with conjunctival autografting shows promising results in the surgical management of recurrent pterygium with mild non-vision-threatening postoperative complications comparable to that of MMC application with conjunctival autografting. Registration number: ClinicalTrials.govNCT04419038.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7815381
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78153812021-01-26 Evaluation of Conjunctival Autografting Augmented with Mitomycin C Application versus Ologen Implantation in the Surgical Treatment of Recurrent Pterygium Wagdy, Faried M. Farahat, Hassan G. Ellakwa, Amin F. Mandour, Sameh S. J Ophthalmol Research Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of augmenting conjunctival autografting with intraoperative mitomycin C (MMC) application versus Ologen implantation in the management of recurrent pterygium. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective randomised study included 63 eyes of 63 patients, with recurrent nasal pterygium, who presented to the outpatient clinic of Menoufia University Hospital in Shebin El Kom and Manshiet Soltan from January 2016 to December 2019. Patients were randomly enrolled into two groups. Group A included 32 eyes of 32 patients who underwent conjunctival autografting augmented with the topical application of MMC (0.2 mg/mL), and group B included 31 eyes of 31 patients who underwent conjunctival autografting augmented with Ologen implantation. All the patients underwent follow-up examinations for a period of 24 months. During each visit, a complete ophthalmic examination was performed. Pterygium regrowth of 1 mm or more, over the cornea, was considered a recurrence. RESULTS: In the MMC group, no recurrence was reported during the 24-month follow-up period. In the Ologen implantation group, recurrence was reported in 2 (8%) eyes. The time interval from surgery to recurrence was 5 months in one case and 8 months in the other. No other serious postoperative complications were reported, and there was no statistically significant difference between the groups in this regard. CONCLUSION: Ologen implantation with conjunctival autografting shows promising results in the surgical management of recurrent pterygium with mild non-vision-threatening postoperative complications comparable to that of MMC application with conjunctival autografting. Registration number: ClinicalTrials.govNCT04419038. Hindawi 2021-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7815381/ /pubmed/33505715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8820926 Text en Copyright © 2021 Faried M. Wagdy et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wagdy, Faried M.
Farahat, Hassan G.
Ellakwa, Amin F.
Mandour, Sameh S.
Evaluation of Conjunctival Autografting Augmented with Mitomycin C Application versus Ologen Implantation in the Surgical Treatment of Recurrent Pterygium
title Evaluation of Conjunctival Autografting Augmented with Mitomycin C Application versus Ologen Implantation in the Surgical Treatment of Recurrent Pterygium
title_full Evaluation of Conjunctival Autografting Augmented with Mitomycin C Application versus Ologen Implantation in the Surgical Treatment of Recurrent Pterygium
title_fullStr Evaluation of Conjunctival Autografting Augmented with Mitomycin C Application versus Ologen Implantation in the Surgical Treatment of Recurrent Pterygium
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Conjunctival Autografting Augmented with Mitomycin C Application versus Ologen Implantation in the Surgical Treatment of Recurrent Pterygium
title_short Evaluation of Conjunctival Autografting Augmented with Mitomycin C Application versus Ologen Implantation in the Surgical Treatment of Recurrent Pterygium
title_sort evaluation of conjunctival autografting augmented with mitomycin c application versus ologen implantation in the surgical treatment of recurrent pterygium
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7815381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33505715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8820926
work_keys_str_mv AT wagdyfariedm evaluationofconjunctivalautograftingaugmentedwithmitomycincapplicationversusologenimplantationinthesurgicaltreatmentofrecurrentpterygium
AT farahathassang evaluationofconjunctivalautograftingaugmentedwithmitomycincapplicationversusologenimplantationinthesurgicaltreatmentofrecurrentpterygium
AT ellakwaaminf evaluationofconjunctivalautograftingaugmentedwithmitomycincapplicationversusologenimplantationinthesurgicaltreatmentofrecurrentpterygium
AT mandoursamehs evaluationofconjunctivalautograftingaugmentedwithmitomycincapplicationversusologenimplantationinthesurgicaltreatmentofrecurrentpterygium