Cargando…
Implementation of long-term non-participant reminders for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening
The clinical effectiveness of screening is highly dependent on uptake. Previous randomised controlled trials suggest that non-participant reminders, which highlight the opportunity to re-book an appointment, can improve participation. The present analysis examines the impact of implementing these re...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7815459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33505841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101308 |
_version_ | 1783638233381339136 |
---|---|
author | Kerrison, R.S. Prentice, A. Marshall, S. Choglay, S. Stoffel, S. Rees, C. von Wagner, C. |
author_facet | Kerrison, R.S. Prentice, A. Marshall, S. Choglay, S. Stoffel, S. Rees, C. von Wagner, C. |
author_sort | Kerrison, R.S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The clinical effectiveness of screening is highly dependent on uptake. Previous randomised controlled trials suggest that non-participant reminders, which highlight the opportunity to re-book an appointment, can improve participation. The present analysis examines the impact of implementing these reminders within the English Flexible Sigmoidoscopy (FS) Screening Programme, which offers once-only FS screening to adults aged 55–59 years. We assessed the screening status of 26,339 individuals invited for once-only FS screening in England. A total of 10,952 (41.6%) had attended screening, and were subsequently ineligible. The remaining 15,387 had not attended screening, and were selected to receive a reminder, 1–2 years after their invitation. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the increase in uptake and the adenoma detection rate (ADR) of those who self-referred, six months after the delivery of the final reminder. Pearson’s Chi-Square was used to compare the ADR between those who attended when invited and those who self-referred. Of the 15,387 adults eligible to receive a reminder, 13,626 (88.6%) were sent a reminder as intended (1,761 were not sent a reminder, due to endoscopy capacity). Of these, 8.0% (n = 1,086) booked and attended an appointment, which equated to a 4.1% increase in uptake from 41.6% at baseline, to 45.7% at follow-up. The ADR was significantly higher for those who self-referred, compared with those who attended when invited (13.3% and 9.5%, respectively; X(2) = 16.138, p = 0.000059). The implementation of non-participant reminders led to a moderate increase in uptake. Implementing non-participant reminders could help mitigate the negative effects of COVID-19 on uptake. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7815459 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78154592021-01-26 Implementation of long-term non-participant reminders for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening Kerrison, R.S. Prentice, A. Marshall, S. Choglay, S. Stoffel, S. Rees, C. von Wagner, C. Prev Med Rep Short Communication The clinical effectiveness of screening is highly dependent on uptake. Previous randomised controlled trials suggest that non-participant reminders, which highlight the opportunity to re-book an appointment, can improve participation. The present analysis examines the impact of implementing these reminders within the English Flexible Sigmoidoscopy (FS) Screening Programme, which offers once-only FS screening to adults aged 55–59 years. We assessed the screening status of 26,339 individuals invited for once-only FS screening in England. A total of 10,952 (41.6%) had attended screening, and were subsequently ineligible. The remaining 15,387 had not attended screening, and were selected to receive a reminder, 1–2 years after their invitation. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the increase in uptake and the adenoma detection rate (ADR) of those who self-referred, six months after the delivery of the final reminder. Pearson’s Chi-Square was used to compare the ADR between those who attended when invited and those who self-referred. Of the 15,387 adults eligible to receive a reminder, 13,626 (88.6%) were sent a reminder as intended (1,761 were not sent a reminder, due to endoscopy capacity). Of these, 8.0% (n = 1,086) booked and attended an appointment, which equated to a 4.1% increase in uptake from 41.6% at baseline, to 45.7% at follow-up. The ADR was significantly higher for those who self-referred, compared with those who attended when invited (13.3% and 9.5%, respectively; X(2) = 16.138, p = 0.000059). The implementation of non-participant reminders led to a moderate increase in uptake. Implementing non-participant reminders could help mitigate the negative effects of COVID-19 on uptake. 2021-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7815459/ /pubmed/33505841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101308 Text en © 2021 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Kerrison, R.S. Prentice, A. Marshall, S. Choglay, S. Stoffel, S. Rees, C. von Wagner, C. Implementation of long-term non-participant reminders for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening |
title | Implementation of long-term non-participant reminders for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening |
title_full | Implementation of long-term non-participant reminders for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening |
title_fullStr | Implementation of long-term non-participant reminders for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation of long-term non-participant reminders for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening |
title_short | Implementation of long-term non-participant reminders for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening |
title_sort | implementation of long-term non-participant reminders for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7815459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33505841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101308 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kerrisonrs implementationoflongtermnonparticipantremindersforflexiblesigmoidoscopyscreening AT prenticea implementationoflongtermnonparticipantremindersforflexiblesigmoidoscopyscreening AT marshalls implementationoflongtermnonparticipantremindersforflexiblesigmoidoscopyscreening AT choglays implementationoflongtermnonparticipantremindersforflexiblesigmoidoscopyscreening AT stoffels implementationoflongtermnonparticipantremindersforflexiblesigmoidoscopyscreening AT reesc implementationoflongtermnonparticipantremindersforflexiblesigmoidoscopyscreening AT vonwagnerc implementationoflongtermnonparticipantremindersforflexiblesigmoidoscopyscreening |