Cargando…

Implementation of long-term non-participant reminders for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening

The clinical effectiveness of screening is highly dependent on uptake. Previous randomised controlled trials suggest that non-participant reminders, which highlight the opportunity to re-book an appointment, can improve participation. The present analysis examines the impact of implementing these re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kerrison, R.S., Prentice, A., Marshall, S., Choglay, S., Stoffel, S., Rees, C., von Wagner, C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7815459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33505841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101308
_version_ 1783638233381339136
author Kerrison, R.S.
Prentice, A.
Marshall, S.
Choglay, S.
Stoffel, S.
Rees, C.
von Wagner, C.
author_facet Kerrison, R.S.
Prentice, A.
Marshall, S.
Choglay, S.
Stoffel, S.
Rees, C.
von Wagner, C.
author_sort Kerrison, R.S.
collection PubMed
description The clinical effectiveness of screening is highly dependent on uptake. Previous randomised controlled trials suggest that non-participant reminders, which highlight the opportunity to re-book an appointment, can improve participation. The present analysis examines the impact of implementing these reminders within the English Flexible Sigmoidoscopy (FS) Screening Programme, which offers once-only FS screening to adults aged 55–59 years. We assessed the screening status of 26,339 individuals invited for once-only FS screening in England. A total of 10,952 (41.6%) had attended screening, and were subsequently ineligible. The remaining 15,387 had not attended screening, and were selected to receive a reminder, 1–2 years after their invitation. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the increase in uptake and the adenoma detection rate (ADR) of those who self-referred, six months after the delivery of the final reminder. Pearson’s Chi-Square was used to compare the ADR between those who attended when invited and those who self-referred. Of the 15,387 adults eligible to receive a reminder, 13,626 (88.6%) were sent a reminder as intended (1,761 were not sent a reminder, due to endoscopy capacity). Of these, 8.0% (n = 1,086) booked and attended an appointment, which equated to a 4.1% increase in uptake from 41.6% at baseline, to 45.7% at follow-up. The ADR was significantly higher for those who self-referred, compared with those who attended when invited (13.3% and 9.5%, respectively; X(2) = 16.138, p = 0.000059). The implementation of non-participant reminders led to a moderate increase in uptake. Implementing non-participant reminders could help mitigate the negative effects of COVID-19 on uptake.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7815459
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78154592021-01-26 Implementation of long-term non-participant reminders for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening Kerrison, R.S. Prentice, A. Marshall, S. Choglay, S. Stoffel, S. Rees, C. von Wagner, C. Prev Med Rep Short Communication The clinical effectiveness of screening is highly dependent on uptake. Previous randomised controlled trials suggest that non-participant reminders, which highlight the opportunity to re-book an appointment, can improve participation. The present analysis examines the impact of implementing these reminders within the English Flexible Sigmoidoscopy (FS) Screening Programme, which offers once-only FS screening to adults aged 55–59 years. We assessed the screening status of 26,339 individuals invited for once-only FS screening in England. A total of 10,952 (41.6%) had attended screening, and were subsequently ineligible. The remaining 15,387 had not attended screening, and were selected to receive a reminder, 1–2 years after their invitation. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the increase in uptake and the adenoma detection rate (ADR) of those who self-referred, six months after the delivery of the final reminder. Pearson’s Chi-Square was used to compare the ADR between those who attended when invited and those who self-referred. Of the 15,387 adults eligible to receive a reminder, 13,626 (88.6%) were sent a reminder as intended (1,761 were not sent a reminder, due to endoscopy capacity). Of these, 8.0% (n = 1,086) booked and attended an appointment, which equated to a 4.1% increase in uptake from 41.6% at baseline, to 45.7% at follow-up. The ADR was significantly higher for those who self-referred, compared with those who attended when invited (13.3% and 9.5%, respectively; X(2) = 16.138, p = 0.000059). The implementation of non-participant reminders led to a moderate increase in uptake. Implementing non-participant reminders could help mitigate the negative effects of COVID-19 on uptake. 2021-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7815459/ /pubmed/33505841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101308 Text en © 2021 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Short Communication
Kerrison, R.S.
Prentice, A.
Marshall, S.
Choglay, S.
Stoffel, S.
Rees, C.
von Wagner, C.
Implementation of long-term non-participant reminders for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening
title Implementation of long-term non-participant reminders for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening
title_full Implementation of long-term non-participant reminders for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening
title_fullStr Implementation of long-term non-participant reminders for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of long-term non-participant reminders for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening
title_short Implementation of long-term non-participant reminders for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening
title_sort implementation of long-term non-participant reminders for flexible sigmoidoscopy screening
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7815459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33505841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101308
work_keys_str_mv AT kerrisonrs implementationoflongtermnonparticipantremindersforflexiblesigmoidoscopyscreening
AT prenticea implementationoflongtermnonparticipantremindersforflexiblesigmoidoscopyscreening
AT marshalls implementationoflongtermnonparticipantremindersforflexiblesigmoidoscopyscreening
AT choglays implementationoflongtermnonparticipantremindersforflexiblesigmoidoscopyscreening
AT stoffels implementationoflongtermnonparticipantremindersforflexiblesigmoidoscopyscreening
AT reesc implementationoflongtermnonparticipantremindersforflexiblesigmoidoscopyscreening
AT vonwagnerc implementationoflongtermnonparticipantremindersforflexiblesigmoidoscopyscreening