Cargando…
Court-Mandated Patients’ Perspectives on the Psychotherapist’s Dual Loyalty Conflict – Between Ally and Enemy
BACKGROUND: Mental health professionals working in correctional contexts engage a double role to care and control. This dual loyalty conflict has repeatedly been criticized to impede the development of a high-quality alliance. As therapeutic alliance is a robust predictor of outcome measures of psyc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7815763/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33488459 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.592638 |
_version_ | 1783638301118300160 |
---|---|
author | Merkt, Helene Wangmo, Tenzin Pageau, Félix Liebrenz, Michael Devaud Cornaz, Corinne Elger, Bernice |
author_facet | Merkt, Helene Wangmo, Tenzin Pageau, Félix Liebrenz, Michael Devaud Cornaz, Corinne Elger, Bernice |
author_sort | Merkt, Helene |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Mental health professionals working in correctional contexts engage a double role to care and control. This dual loyalty conflict has repeatedly been criticized to impede the development of a high-quality alliance. As therapeutic alliance is a robust predictor of outcome measures of psychotherapy, it is essential to investigate the effects of this ethical dilemma. METHODS: This qualitative interview study investigates patients’ perceptions of their therapists’ dual role conflict in court-mandated treatment settings. We interviewed 41 older incarcerated persons using a semi-structured interview guide, the interviews were subsequently analyzed following thematic analysis. RESULTS: We first present the patients’ perceptions of their treating psychotherapist’s dual loyalty conflict, which was linked to their overall treatment experience. In a second step, we outline the study participants’ reasons for this judgment, which were most commonly linked to feelings of trust or betrayal. More specifically, they named certain therapist characteristics and activities that enabled them to develop a trustful therapeutic alliance, which we grouped into four topics: (1) respecting the patient’s pace and perceived coercion; (2) patient health needs to be first priority; (3) clarity in roles and responsibilities; and (4) the art of communication – between transparency and unchecked information sharing. DISCUSSION: Developing a high quality alliance in mandatory offender treatment is central due to its relationship with recovery and desistance. Our findings show that some therapists’ characteristics and activities attenuate the negative impact of their double role on the development and maintenance of the alliance. To increase the effectiveness of court-mandated treatments, we need to support clinicians in dealing with their dual role to allow the formation of a high quality therapeutic alliance. Our qualitative interview study contributed to this much-needed empirical research on therapist’ characteristics promoting a trustful relationship in correctional settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7815763 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78157632021-01-21 Court-Mandated Patients’ Perspectives on the Psychotherapist’s Dual Loyalty Conflict – Between Ally and Enemy Merkt, Helene Wangmo, Tenzin Pageau, Félix Liebrenz, Michael Devaud Cornaz, Corinne Elger, Bernice Front Psychol Psychology BACKGROUND: Mental health professionals working in correctional contexts engage a double role to care and control. This dual loyalty conflict has repeatedly been criticized to impede the development of a high-quality alliance. As therapeutic alliance is a robust predictor of outcome measures of psychotherapy, it is essential to investigate the effects of this ethical dilemma. METHODS: This qualitative interview study investigates patients’ perceptions of their therapists’ dual role conflict in court-mandated treatment settings. We interviewed 41 older incarcerated persons using a semi-structured interview guide, the interviews were subsequently analyzed following thematic analysis. RESULTS: We first present the patients’ perceptions of their treating psychotherapist’s dual loyalty conflict, which was linked to their overall treatment experience. In a second step, we outline the study participants’ reasons for this judgment, which were most commonly linked to feelings of trust or betrayal. More specifically, they named certain therapist characteristics and activities that enabled them to develop a trustful therapeutic alliance, which we grouped into four topics: (1) respecting the patient’s pace and perceived coercion; (2) patient health needs to be first priority; (3) clarity in roles and responsibilities; and (4) the art of communication – between transparency and unchecked information sharing. DISCUSSION: Developing a high quality alliance in mandatory offender treatment is central due to its relationship with recovery and desistance. Our findings show that some therapists’ characteristics and activities attenuate the negative impact of their double role on the development and maintenance of the alliance. To increase the effectiveness of court-mandated treatments, we need to support clinicians in dealing with their dual role to allow the formation of a high quality therapeutic alliance. Our qualitative interview study contributed to this much-needed empirical research on therapist’ characteristics promoting a trustful relationship in correctional settings. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7815763/ /pubmed/33488459 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.592638 Text en Copyright © 2021 Merkt, Wangmo, Pageau, Liebrenz, Devaud Cornaz and Elger. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Merkt, Helene Wangmo, Tenzin Pageau, Félix Liebrenz, Michael Devaud Cornaz, Corinne Elger, Bernice Court-Mandated Patients’ Perspectives on the Psychotherapist’s Dual Loyalty Conflict – Between Ally and Enemy |
title | Court-Mandated Patients’ Perspectives on the Psychotherapist’s Dual Loyalty Conflict – Between Ally and Enemy |
title_full | Court-Mandated Patients’ Perspectives on the Psychotherapist’s Dual Loyalty Conflict – Between Ally and Enemy |
title_fullStr | Court-Mandated Patients’ Perspectives on the Psychotherapist’s Dual Loyalty Conflict – Between Ally and Enemy |
title_full_unstemmed | Court-Mandated Patients’ Perspectives on the Psychotherapist’s Dual Loyalty Conflict – Between Ally and Enemy |
title_short | Court-Mandated Patients’ Perspectives on the Psychotherapist’s Dual Loyalty Conflict – Between Ally and Enemy |
title_sort | court-mandated patients’ perspectives on the psychotherapist’s dual loyalty conflict – between ally and enemy |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7815763/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33488459 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.592638 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT merkthelene courtmandatedpatientsperspectivesonthepsychotherapistsdualloyaltyconflictbetweenallyandenemy AT wangmotenzin courtmandatedpatientsperspectivesonthepsychotherapistsdualloyaltyconflictbetweenallyandenemy AT pageaufelix courtmandatedpatientsperspectivesonthepsychotherapistsdualloyaltyconflictbetweenallyandenemy AT liebrenzmichael courtmandatedpatientsperspectivesonthepsychotherapistsdualloyaltyconflictbetweenallyandenemy AT devaudcornazcorinne courtmandatedpatientsperspectivesonthepsychotherapistsdualloyaltyconflictbetweenallyandenemy AT elgerbernice courtmandatedpatientsperspectivesonthepsychotherapistsdualloyaltyconflictbetweenallyandenemy |