Cargando…

Court-Mandated Patients’ Perspectives on the Psychotherapist’s Dual Loyalty Conflict – Between Ally and Enemy

BACKGROUND: Mental health professionals working in correctional contexts engage a double role to care and control. This dual loyalty conflict has repeatedly been criticized to impede the development of a high-quality alliance. As therapeutic alliance is a robust predictor of outcome measures of psyc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Merkt, Helene, Wangmo, Tenzin, Pageau, Félix, Liebrenz, Michael, Devaud Cornaz, Corinne, Elger, Bernice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7815763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33488459
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.592638
_version_ 1783638301118300160
author Merkt, Helene
Wangmo, Tenzin
Pageau, Félix
Liebrenz, Michael
Devaud Cornaz, Corinne
Elger, Bernice
author_facet Merkt, Helene
Wangmo, Tenzin
Pageau, Félix
Liebrenz, Michael
Devaud Cornaz, Corinne
Elger, Bernice
author_sort Merkt, Helene
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mental health professionals working in correctional contexts engage a double role to care and control. This dual loyalty conflict has repeatedly been criticized to impede the development of a high-quality alliance. As therapeutic alliance is a robust predictor of outcome measures of psychotherapy, it is essential to investigate the effects of this ethical dilemma. METHODS: This qualitative interview study investigates patients’ perceptions of their therapists’ dual role conflict in court-mandated treatment settings. We interviewed 41 older incarcerated persons using a semi-structured interview guide, the interviews were subsequently analyzed following thematic analysis. RESULTS: We first present the patients’ perceptions of their treating psychotherapist’s dual loyalty conflict, which was linked to their overall treatment experience. In a second step, we outline the study participants’ reasons for this judgment, which were most commonly linked to feelings of trust or betrayal. More specifically, they named certain therapist characteristics and activities that enabled them to develop a trustful therapeutic alliance, which we grouped into four topics: (1) respecting the patient’s pace and perceived coercion; (2) patient health needs to be first priority; (3) clarity in roles and responsibilities; and (4) the art of communication – between transparency and unchecked information sharing. DISCUSSION: Developing a high quality alliance in mandatory offender treatment is central due to its relationship with recovery and desistance. Our findings show that some therapists’ characteristics and activities attenuate the negative impact of their double role on the development and maintenance of the alliance. To increase the effectiveness of court-mandated treatments, we need to support clinicians in dealing with their dual role to allow the formation of a high quality therapeutic alliance. Our qualitative interview study contributed to this much-needed empirical research on therapist’ characteristics promoting a trustful relationship in correctional settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7815763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78157632021-01-21 Court-Mandated Patients’ Perspectives on the Psychotherapist’s Dual Loyalty Conflict – Between Ally and Enemy Merkt, Helene Wangmo, Tenzin Pageau, Félix Liebrenz, Michael Devaud Cornaz, Corinne Elger, Bernice Front Psychol Psychology BACKGROUND: Mental health professionals working in correctional contexts engage a double role to care and control. This dual loyalty conflict has repeatedly been criticized to impede the development of a high-quality alliance. As therapeutic alliance is a robust predictor of outcome measures of psychotherapy, it is essential to investigate the effects of this ethical dilemma. METHODS: This qualitative interview study investigates patients’ perceptions of their therapists’ dual role conflict in court-mandated treatment settings. We interviewed 41 older incarcerated persons using a semi-structured interview guide, the interviews were subsequently analyzed following thematic analysis. RESULTS: We first present the patients’ perceptions of their treating psychotherapist’s dual loyalty conflict, which was linked to their overall treatment experience. In a second step, we outline the study participants’ reasons for this judgment, which were most commonly linked to feelings of trust or betrayal. More specifically, they named certain therapist characteristics and activities that enabled them to develop a trustful therapeutic alliance, which we grouped into four topics: (1) respecting the patient’s pace and perceived coercion; (2) patient health needs to be first priority; (3) clarity in roles and responsibilities; and (4) the art of communication – between transparency and unchecked information sharing. DISCUSSION: Developing a high quality alliance in mandatory offender treatment is central due to its relationship with recovery and desistance. Our findings show that some therapists’ characteristics and activities attenuate the negative impact of their double role on the development and maintenance of the alliance. To increase the effectiveness of court-mandated treatments, we need to support clinicians in dealing with their dual role to allow the formation of a high quality therapeutic alliance. Our qualitative interview study contributed to this much-needed empirical research on therapist’ characteristics promoting a trustful relationship in correctional settings. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7815763/ /pubmed/33488459 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.592638 Text en Copyright © 2021 Merkt, Wangmo, Pageau, Liebrenz, Devaud Cornaz and Elger. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Merkt, Helene
Wangmo, Tenzin
Pageau, Félix
Liebrenz, Michael
Devaud Cornaz, Corinne
Elger, Bernice
Court-Mandated Patients’ Perspectives on the Psychotherapist’s Dual Loyalty Conflict – Between Ally and Enemy
title Court-Mandated Patients’ Perspectives on the Psychotherapist’s Dual Loyalty Conflict – Between Ally and Enemy
title_full Court-Mandated Patients’ Perspectives on the Psychotherapist’s Dual Loyalty Conflict – Between Ally and Enemy
title_fullStr Court-Mandated Patients’ Perspectives on the Psychotherapist’s Dual Loyalty Conflict – Between Ally and Enemy
title_full_unstemmed Court-Mandated Patients’ Perspectives on the Psychotherapist’s Dual Loyalty Conflict – Between Ally and Enemy
title_short Court-Mandated Patients’ Perspectives on the Psychotherapist’s Dual Loyalty Conflict – Between Ally and Enemy
title_sort court-mandated patients’ perspectives on the psychotherapist’s dual loyalty conflict – between ally and enemy
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7815763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33488459
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.592638
work_keys_str_mv AT merkthelene courtmandatedpatientsperspectivesonthepsychotherapistsdualloyaltyconflictbetweenallyandenemy
AT wangmotenzin courtmandatedpatientsperspectivesonthepsychotherapistsdualloyaltyconflictbetweenallyandenemy
AT pageaufelix courtmandatedpatientsperspectivesonthepsychotherapistsdualloyaltyconflictbetweenallyandenemy
AT liebrenzmichael courtmandatedpatientsperspectivesonthepsychotherapistsdualloyaltyconflictbetweenallyandenemy
AT devaudcornazcorinne courtmandatedpatientsperspectivesonthepsychotherapistsdualloyaltyconflictbetweenallyandenemy
AT elgerbernice courtmandatedpatientsperspectivesonthepsychotherapistsdualloyaltyconflictbetweenallyandenemy