Cargando…

The comparative effectiveness of mpMRI and MRI-guided biopsy vs regular biopsy in a population-based PSA testing: a modeling study

The benefit of prostate cancer screening is counterbalanced by the risk of overdiagnosis and overtreatment. The use of a multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) test after a positive prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test followed by magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy (MRIGB) may red...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Getaneh, Abraham M., Heijnsdijk, Eveline A. M., de Koning, Harry J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7815791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33469144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81459-2
_version_ 1783638307461136384
author Getaneh, Abraham M.
Heijnsdijk, Eveline A. M.
de Koning, Harry J.
author_facet Getaneh, Abraham M.
Heijnsdijk, Eveline A. M.
de Koning, Harry J.
author_sort Getaneh, Abraham M.
collection PubMed
description The benefit of prostate cancer screening is counterbalanced by the risk of overdiagnosis and overtreatment. The use of a multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) test after a positive prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test followed by magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy (MRIGB) may reduce these harms. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of mpMRI and MRIGB vs the regular screening pathway in a population-based prostate cancer screening setting. A micro-simulation model was used to predict the effects of regular PSA screening (men with elevated PSA followed by TRUSGB) and MRI based screening (men with elevated PSA followed by mpMRI and MRIGB). We predicted reduction of overdiagnosis, harm-benefit ratio (overdiagnosis per cancer death averted), reduction in number of biopsies, detection of clinically significant cancer, prostate cancer death averted, life-years gained (LYG), and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) gained for both strategies. A univariate sensitivity analysis and threshold analysis were performed to assess uncertainty around the test sensitivity parameters used in the MRI strategy.In the MRI pathway, we predicted a 43% reduction in the risk of overdiagnosis, compared to the regular pathway. Similarly a lower harm-benefit ratio (overdiagnosis per cancer death averted) was predicted for this strategy compared to the regular screening pathway (1.0 vs 1.8 respectively). Prostate cancer mortality reduction, LY and QALYs gained were also slightly increased in the MRI pathway than the regular screening pathway. Furthermore, 30% of men with a positive PSA test could avoid a biopsy as compared to the regular screening pathway. Compared to regular PSA screening, the use of mpMRI as a triage test followed by MRIGB can substantially reduce the risk of overdiagnosis and improve the harm-benefit balance, while maximizing prostate cancer mortality reduction and QALYs gained.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7815791
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78157912021-01-21 The comparative effectiveness of mpMRI and MRI-guided biopsy vs regular biopsy in a population-based PSA testing: a modeling study Getaneh, Abraham M. Heijnsdijk, Eveline A. M. de Koning, Harry J. Sci Rep Article The benefit of prostate cancer screening is counterbalanced by the risk of overdiagnosis and overtreatment. The use of a multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) test after a positive prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test followed by magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy (MRIGB) may reduce these harms. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of mpMRI and MRIGB vs the regular screening pathway in a population-based prostate cancer screening setting. A micro-simulation model was used to predict the effects of regular PSA screening (men with elevated PSA followed by TRUSGB) and MRI based screening (men with elevated PSA followed by mpMRI and MRIGB). We predicted reduction of overdiagnosis, harm-benefit ratio (overdiagnosis per cancer death averted), reduction in number of biopsies, detection of clinically significant cancer, prostate cancer death averted, life-years gained (LYG), and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) gained for both strategies. A univariate sensitivity analysis and threshold analysis were performed to assess uncertainty around the test sensitivity parameters used in the MRI strategy.In the MRI pathway, we predicted a 43% reduction in the risk of overdiagnosis, compared to the regular pathway. Similarly a lower harm-benefit ratio (overdiagnosis per cancer death averted) was predicted for this strategy compared to the regular screening pathway (1.0 vs 1.8 respectively). Prostate cancer mortality reduction, LY and QALYs gained were also slightly increased in the MRI pathway than the regular screening pathway. Furthermore, 30% of men with a positive PSA test could avoid a biopsy as compared to the regular screening pathway. Compared to regular PSA screening, the use of mpMRI as a triage test followed by MRIGB can substantially reduce the risk of overdiagnosis and improve the harm-benefit balance, while maximizing prostate cancer mortality reduction and QALYs gained. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7815791/ /pubmed/33469144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81459-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Getaneh, Abraham M.
Heijnsdijk, Eveline A. M.
de Koning, Harry J.
The comparative effectiveness of mpMRI and MRI-guided biopsy vs regular biopsy in a population-based PSA testing: a modeling study
title The comparative effectiveness of mpMRI and MRI-guided biopsy vs regular biopsy in a population-based PSA testing: a modeling study
title_full The comparative effectiveness of mpMRI and MRI-guided biopsy vs regular biopsy in a population-based PSA testing: a modeling study
title_fullStr The comparative effectiveness of mpMRI and MRI-guided biopsy vs regular biopsy in a population-based PSA testing: a modeling study
title_full_unstemmed The comparative effectiveness of mpMRI and MRI-guided biopsy vs regular biopsy in a population-based PSA testing: a modeling study
title_short The comparative effectiveness of mpMRI and MRI-guided biopsy vs regular biopsy in a population-based PSA testing: a modeling study
title_sort comparative effectiveness of mpmri and mri-guided biopsy vs regular biopsy in a population-based psa testing: a modeling study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7815791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33469144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81459-2
work_keys_str_mv AT getanehabrahamm thecomparativeeffectivenessofmpmriandmriguidedbiopsyvsregularbiopsyinapopulationbasedpsatestingamodelingstudy
AT heijnsdijkevelineam thecomparativeeffectivenessofmpmriandmriguidedbiopsyvsregularbiopsyinapopulationbasedpsatestingamodelingstudy
AT dekoningharryj thecomparativeeffectivenessofmpmriandmriguidedbiopsyvsregularbiopsyinapopulationbasedpsatestingamodelingstudy
AT getanehabrahamm comparativeeffectivenessofmpmriandmriguidedbiopsyvsregularbiopsyinapopulationbasedpsatestingamodelingstudy
AT heijnsdijkevelineam comparativeeffectivenessofmpmriandmriguidedbiopsyvsregularbiopsyinapopulationbasedpsatestingamodelingstudy
AT dekoningharryj comparativeeffectivenessofmpmriandmriguidedbiopsyvsregularbiopsyinapopulationbasedpsatestingamodelingstudy