Cargando…

Single versus dual elastic nails for closed reduction and antegrade intramedullary nailing of displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures

Closed reduction and internal fixation with antegrade intramedullary nails is a feasible and effective treatment for displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures (FMNFs). The present study aimed to compare clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with displaced FMNFs after treatment with single o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zeng, Langqing, Zeng, Lulu, Miao, Xiaogang, Chen, Yunfeng, Liang, Weiguo, Jiang, Yuwen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7815815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33469102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81242-3
_version_ 1783638313047949312
author Zeng, Langqing
Zeng, Lulu
Miao, Xiaogang
Chen, Yunfeng
Liang, Weiguo
Jiang, Yuwen
author_facet Zeng, Langqing
Zeng, Lulu
Miao, Xiaogang
Chen, Yunfeng
Liang, Weiguo
Jiang, Yuwen
author_sort Zeng, Langqing
collection PubMed
description Closed reduction and internal fixation with antegrade intramedullary nails is a feasible and effective treatment for displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures (FMNFs). The present study aimed to compare clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with displaced FMNFs after treatment with single or dual antegrade elastic intramedullary nails (AEIMNs). Thirty-three patients were treated with a single 2.0 mm AEIMN and 34 patients were treated with two 1.5 mm AEIMNs. Clinical and radiological outcomes included grip strength, active range of motion (ROM), active flexion and extension of the fifth metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint, dorsal angulation loss, and metacarpal shortening of the fifth metacarpal at 12 months after treatment. No significant difference was observed between the two groups with respect to grip strength, ROM or flexion of the fifth MCP joint. The average values of dorsal angulation loss, metacarpal shortening, and extension of the fifth MCP joint of the dual nails group were better than those of the single nail group (dorsal angulation loss, 2.79 ± 1.93° vs. 4.05 ± 1.59°, P = 0.009; metacarpal shortening, 1.66 ± 0.80 mm vs. 2.12 ± 0.88 mm, P = 0.028; extension of the fifth MCP joint, 7.71 ± 4.43° vs. 4.82 ± 4.09°, P = 0.012). In conclusion, dual AEIMNs fixation provided better MCP extension and radiological outcomes than single AEIMN fixation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7815815
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78158152021-01-21 Single versus dual elastic nails for closed reduction and antegrade intramedullary nailing of displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures Zeng, Langqing Zeng, Lulu Miao, Xiaogang Chen, Yunfeng Liang, Weiguo Jiang, Yuwen Sci Rep Article Closed reduction and internal fixation with antegrade intramedullary nails is a feasible and effective treatment for displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures (FMNFs). The present study aimed to compare clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with displaced FMNFs after treatment with single or dual antegrade elastic intramedullary nails (AEIMNs). Thirty-three patients were treated with a single 2.0 mm AEIMN and 34 patients were treated with two 1.5 mm AEIMNs. Clinical and radiological outcomes included grip strength, active range of motion (ROM), active flexion and extension of the fifth metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint, dorsal angulation loss, and metacarpal shortening of the fifth metacarpal at 12 months after treatment. No significant difference was observed between the two groups with respect to grip strength, ROM or flexion of the fifth MCP joint. The average values of dorsal angulation loss, metacarpal shortening, and extension of the fifth MCP joint of the dual nails group were better than those of the single nail group (dorsal angulation loss, 2.79 ± 1.93° vs. 4.05 ± 1.59°, P = 0.009; metacarpal shortening, 1.66 ± 0.80 mm vs. 2.12 ± 0.88 mm, P = 0.028; extension of the fifth MCP joint, 7.71 ± 4.43° vs. 4.82 ± 4.09°, P = 0.012). In conclusion, dual AEIMNs fixation provided better MCP extension and radiological outcomes than single AEIMN fixation. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7815815/ /pubmed/33469102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81242-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Zeng, Langqing
Zeng, Lulu
Miao, Xiaogang
Chen, Yunfeng
Liang, Weiguo
Jiang, Yuwen
Single versus dual elastic nails for closed reduction and antegrade intramedullary nailing of displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures
title Single versus dual elastic nails for closed reduction and antegrade intramedullary nailing of displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures
title_full Single versus dual elastic nails for closed reduction and antegrade intramedullary nailing of displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures
title_fullStr Single versus dual elastic nails for closed reduction and antegrade intramedullary nailing of displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures
title_full_unstemmed Single versus dual elastic nails for closed reduction and antegrade intramedullary nailing of displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures
title_short Single versus dual elastic nails for closed reduction and antegrade intramedullary nailing of displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures
title_sort single versus dual elastic nails for closed reduction and antegrade intramedullary nailing of displaced fifth metacarpal neck fractures
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7815815/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33469102
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81242-3
work_keys_str_mv AT zenglangqing singleversusdualelasticnailsforclosedreductionandantegradeintramedullarynailingofdisplacedfifthmetacarpalneckfractures
AT zenglulu singleversusdualelasticnailsforclosedreductionandantegradeintramedullarynailingofdisplacedfifthmetacarpalneckfractures
AT miaoxiaogang singleversusdualelasticnailsforclosedreductionandantegradeintramedullarynailingofdisplacedfifthmetacarpalneckfractures
AT chenyunfeng singleversusdualelasticnailsforclosedreductionandantegradeintramedullarynailingofdisplacedfifthmetacarpalneckfractures
AT liangweiguo singleversusdualelasticnailsforclosedreductionandantegradeintramedullarynailingofdisplacedfifthmetacarpalneckfractures
AT jiangyuwen singleversusdualelasticnailsforclosedreductionandantegradeintramedullarynailingofdisplacedfifthmetacarpalneckfractures