Experience sharing of conservative treatment after a 90-year-old male replacing the suprapubic bladder catheter enters the small intestine: A rare case report

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of intestinal perforation caused by the SBC enters the small intestine in elderly patients is a challenge for urologists. The report is to share our experience of conservative treatment after a 90-year-old male with the suprapubic bladder catheter enters the small intestine. PRESENTATION OF CASE: Because of the device was obstructed, a 90-year-old male went to our hospital with his family and requested to replace the SBC. When the fistula tube was replaced, it entered the intestine through the intestinal injury site instead of entering the bladder. During the hospitalization, the patient was given supportive treatments and the SBC was dynamically monitored daily and it was intermittently withdrawn out during this period. After the drainage volume was less than 10 mL for three consecutive days and the intestinal fistula was healing gradually, the catheter was taken out. DISCUSSION: According to our experience, the common complications in the process include failure to pull out the SBC, abnormal position of the SBC, and poor drainage of the SBC. However, the drainage tube placing into the small intestine through the original hole of the suprapubic bladder fistula during the replacement process is quite rare. When elderly patients have traumatic small bowel perforation, the diagnosis and treatment of intestinal perforation in elderly patients was particularly important. CONCLUSION: The conservative treatment of intestinal perforation is suitable for elderly patients who are unsuitable or unwilling to undergo a surgical operation. Of course, it should be in accordance with the patient's condition to make the right choice of treatment.