Cargando…

First international quality control programme for laboratories measuring antimicrobial drugs to support dose individualization in critically ill patients

OBJECTIVES: International quality control (proficiency testing) programmes are instituted to safeguard the analytical performance of laboratories and to aid these laboratories in identifying sources of error in their analytical methods. We describe the first international quality control programme f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wallenburg, E, Brüggemann, R J, Asouit, K, Teulen, M, de Haan, A F J, Franssen, E J F, Aarnoutse, R E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7816175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33094803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaa445
_version_ 1783638387894255616
author Wallenburg, E
Brüggemann, R J
Asouit, K
Teulen, M
de Haan, A F J
Franssen, E J F
Aarnoutse, R E
author_facet Wallenburg, E
Brüggemann, R J
Asouit, K
Teulen, M
de Haan, A F J
Franssen, E J F
Aarnoutse, R E
author_sort Wallenburg, E
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: International quality control (proficiency testing) programmes are instituted to safeguard the analytical performance of laboratories and to aid these laboratories in identifying sources of error in their analytical methods. We describe the first international quality control programme for antimicrobial agents that are frequently used in critically ill patients. METHODS: Spiked plasma samples with ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, flucloxacillin, piperacillin, sulfamethoxazole, N-acetyl sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim were shipped to 22 laboratories from eight different countries. Acceptable accuracy by the performing laboratory was defined if measurements were within 80%–120% limits of the true weighed-in concentrations. RESULTS: A total of 81% of the measurements (ranging between 56% and 100%, dependent on drug) were within the 80%–120% limits of the true weighed-in concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: We found a relatively good performance of the participating laboratories in measuring eight different antimicrobial drugs. Nevertheless, some of the antimicrobial drugs were not measured properly as up to 44% of the measurements was inaccurate depending on the drug. Our results emphasize the need for and utility of an ongoing quality control programme.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7816175
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78161752021-01-26 First international quality control programme for laboratories measuring antimicrobial drugs to support dose individualization in critically ill patients Wallenburg, E Brüggemann, R J Asouit, K Teulen, M de Haan, A F J Franssen, E J F Aarnoutse, R E J Antimicrob Chemother Original Research OBJECTIVES: International quality control (proficiency testing) programmes are instituted to safeguard the analytical performance of laboratories and to aid these laboratories in identifying sources of error in their analytical methods. We describe the first international quality control programme for antimicrobial agents that are frequently used in critically ill patients. METHODS: Spiked plasma samples with ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, flucloxacillin, piperacillin, sulfamethoxazole, N-acetyl sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim were shipped to 22 laboratories from eight different countries. Acceptable accuracy by the performing laboratory was defined if measurements were within 80%–120% limits of the true weighed-in concentrations. RESULTS: A total of 81% of the measurements (ranging between 56% and 100%, dependent on drug) were within the 80%–120% limits of the true weighed-in concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: We found a relatively good performance of the participating laboratories in measuring eight different antimicrobial drugs. Nevertheless, some of the antimicrobial drugs were not measured properly as up to 44% of the measurements was inaccurate depending on the drug. Our results emphasize the need for and utility of an ongoing quality control programme. Oxford University Press 2020-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7816175/ /pubmed/33094803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaa445 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Research
Wallenburg, E
Brüggemann, R J
Asouit, K
Teulen, M
de Haan, A F J
Franssen, E J F
Aarnoutse, R E
First international quality control programme for laboratories measuring antimicrobial drugs to support dose individualization in critically ill patients
title First international quality control programme for laboratories measuring antimicrobial drugs to support dose individualization in critically ill patients
title_full First international quality control programme for laboratories measuring antimicrobial drugs to support dose individualization in critically ill patients
title_fullStr First international quality control programme for laboratories measuring antimicrobial drugs to support dose individualization in critically ill patients
title_full_unstemmed First international quality control programme for laboratories measuring antimicrobial drugs to support dose individualization in critically ill patients
title_short First international quality control programme for laboratories measuring antimicrobial drugs to support dose individualization in critically ill patients
title_sort first international quality control programme for laboratories measuring antimicrobial drugs to support dose individualization in critically ill patients
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7816175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33094803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaa445
work_keys_str_mv AT wallenburge firstinternationalqualitycontrolprogrammeforlaboratoriesmeasuringantimicrobialdrugstosupportdoseindividualizationincriticallyillpatients
AT bruggemannrj firstinternationalqualitycontrolprogrammeforlaboratoriesmeasuringantimicrobialdrugstosupportdoseindividualizationincriticallyillpatients
AT asouitk firstinternationalqualitycontrolprogrammeforlaboratoriesmeasuringantimicrobialdrugstosupportdoseindividualizationincriticallyillpatients
AT teulenm firstinternationalqualitycontrolprogrammeforlaboratoriesmeasuringantimicrobialdrugstosupportdoseindividualizationincriticallyillpatients
AT dehaanafj firstinternationalqualitycontrolprogrammeforlaboratoriesmeasuringantimicrobialdrugstosupportdoseindividualizationincriticallyillpatients
AT franssenejf firstinternationalqualitycontrolprogrammeforlaboratoriesmeasuringantimicrobialdrugstosupportdoseindividualizationincriticallyillpatients
AT aarnoutsere firstinternationalqualitycontrolprogrammeforlaboratoriesmeasuringantimicrobialdrugstosupportdoseindividualizationincriticallyillpatients