Cargando…
Gastric Cancer Treatments and Survival Trends in the United States
Gastric cancer is the third most common cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Despite evidence-based recommendation for treatment, the current treatment patterns for all stages of gastric cancer remain largely unexplored. This study investigates trends in the treatments and survival of gastric cancer. T...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7816178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33704182 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28010017 |
_version_ | 1783638388594704384 |
---|---|
author | Stahl, Kelly A. Olecki, Elizabeth J. Dixon, Matthew E. Peng, June S. Torres, Madeline B. Gusani, Niraj J. Shen, Chan |
author_facet | Stahl, Kelly A. Olecki, Elizabeth J. Dixon, Matthew E. Peng, June S. Torres, Madeline B. Gusani, Niraj J. Shen, Chan |
author_sort | Stahl, Kelly A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Gastric cancer is the third most common cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Despite evidence-based recommendation for treatment, the current treatment patterns for all stages of gastric cancer remain largely unexplored. This study investigates trends in the treatments and survival of gastric cancer. The National Cancer Database was used to identify gastric adenocarcinoma patients from 2004–2016. Chi-square tests were used to examine subgroup differences between disease stages: Stage I, II/III and IV. Multivariate analyses identified factors associated with the receipt of guideline concordant care. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to assess three-year overall survival. The final cohort included 108,150 patients: 23,584 Stage I, 40,216 Stage II/III, and 44,350 Stage IV. Stage specific guideline concordant care was received in only 73% of patients with Stage I disease and 51% of patients with Stage II/III disease. Patients who received guideline consistent care had significantly improved survival compared to those who did not. Overall, we found only moderate improvement in guideline adherence and three-year overall survival during the 13-year study time period. This study showed underutilization of stage specific guideline concordant care for stage I and II/III disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7816178 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78161782021-01-27 Gastric Cancer Treatments and Survival Trends in the United States Stahl, Kelly A. Olecki, Elizabeth J. Dixon, Matthew E. Peng, June S. Torres, Madeline B. Gusani, Niraj J. Shen, Chan Curr Oncol Article Gastric cancer is the third most common cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Despite evidence-based recommendation for treatment, the current treatment patterns for all stages of gastric cancer remain largely unexplored. This study investigates trends in the treatments and survival of gastric cancer. The National Cancer Database was used to identify gastric adenocarcinoma patients from 2004–2016. Chi-square tests were used to examine subgroup differences between disease stages: Stage I, II/III and IV. Multivariate analyses identified factors associated with the receipt of guideline concordant care. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to assess three-year overall survival. The final cohort included 108,150 patients: 23,584 Stage I, 40,216 Stage II/III, and 44,350 Stage IV. Stage specific guideline concordant care was received in only 73% of patients with Stage I disease and 51% of patients with Stage II/III disease. Patients who received guideline consistent care had significantly improved survival compared to those who did not. Overall, we found only moderate improvement in guideline adherence and three-year overall survival during the 13-year study time period. This study showed underutilization of stage specific guideline concordant care for stage I and II/III disease. MDPI 2020-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7816178/ /pubmed/33704182 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28010017 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Stahl, Kelly A. Olecki, Elizabeth J. Dixon, Matthew E. Peng, June S. Torres, Madeline B. Gusani, Niraj J. Shen, Chan Gastric Cancer Treatments and Survival Trends in the United States |
title | Gastric Cancer Treatments and Survival Trends in the United States |
title_full | Gastric Cancer Treatments and Survival Trends in the United States |
title_fullStr | Gastric Cancer Treatments and Survival Trends in the United States |
title_full_unstemmed | Gastric Cancer Treatments and Survival Trends in the United States |
title_short | Gastric Cancer Treatments and Survival Trends in the United States |
title_sort | gastric cancer treatments and survival trends in the united states |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7816178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33704182 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28010017 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stahlkellya gastriccancertreatmentsandsurvivaltrendsintheunitedstates AT oleckielizabethj gastriccancertreatmentsandsurvivaltrendsintheunitedstates AT dixonmatthewe gastriccancertreatmentsandsurvivaltrendsintheunitedstates AT pengjunes gastriccancertreatmentsandsurvivaltrendsintheunitedstates AT torresmadelineb gastriccancertreatmentsandsurvivaltrendsintheunitedstates AT gusaninirajj gastriccancertreatmentsandsurvivaltrendsintheunitedstates AT shenchan gastriccancertreatmentsandsurvivaltrendsintheunitedstates |