Cargando…

Gastric Cancer Treatments and Survival Trends in the United States

Gastric cancer is the third most common cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Despite evidence-based recommendation for treatment, the current treatment patterns for all stages of gastric cancer remain largely unexplored. This study investigates trends in the treatments and survival of gastric cancer. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stahl, Kelly A., Olecki, Elizabeth J., Dixon, Matthew E., Peng, June S., Torres, Madeline B., Gusani, Niraj J., Shen, Chan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7816178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33704182
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28010017
_version_ 1783638388594704384
author Stahl, Kelly A.
Olecki, Elizabeth J.
Dixon, Matthew E.
Peng, June S.
Torres, Madeline B.
Gusani, Niraj J.
Shen, Chan
author_facet Stahl, Kelly A.
Olecki, Elizabeth J.
Dixon, Matthew E.
Peng, June S.
Torres, Madeline B.
Gusani, Niraj J.
Shen, Chan
author_sort Stahl, Kelly A.
collection PubMed
description Gastric cancer is the third most common cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Despite evidence-based recommendation for treatment, the current treatment patterns for all stages of gastric cancer remain largely unexplored. This study investigates trends in the treatments and survival of gastric cancer. The National Cancer Database was used to identify gastric adenocarcinoma patients from 2004–2016. Chi-square tests were used to examine subgroup differences between disease stages: Stage I, II/III and IV. Multivariate analyses identified factors associated with the receipt of guideline concordant care. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to assess three-year overall survival. The final cohort included 108,150 patients: 23,584 Stage I, 40,216 Stage II/III, and 44,350 Stage IV. Stage specific guideline concordant care was received in only 73% of patients with Stage I disease and 51% of patients with Stage II/III disease. Patients who received guideline consistent care had significantly improved survival compared to those who did not. Overall, we found only moderate improvement in guideline adherence and three-year overall survival during the 13-year study time period. This study showed underutilization of stage specific guideline concordant care for stage I and II/III disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7816178
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78161782021-01-27 Gastric Cancer Treatments and Survival Trends in the United States Stahl, Kelly A. Olecki, Elizabeth J. Dixon, Matthew E. Peng, June S. Torres, Madeline B. Gusani, Niraj J. Shen, Chan Curr Oncol Article Gastric cancer is the third most common cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Despite evidence-based recommendation for treatment, the current treatment patterns for all stages of gastric cancer remain largely unexplored. This study investigates trends in the treatments and survival of gastric cancer. The National Cancer Database was used to identify gastric adenocarcinoma patients from 2004–2016. Chi-square tests were used to examine subgroup differences between disease stages: Stage I, II/III and IV. Multivariate analyses identified factors associated with the receipt of guideline concordant care. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to assess three-year overall survival. The final cohort included 108,150 patients: 23,584 Stage I, 40,216 Stage II/III, and 44,350 Stage IV. Stage specific guideline concordant care was received in only 73% of patients with Stage I disease and 51% of patients with Stage II/III disease. Patients who received guideline consistent care had significantly improved survival compared to those who did not. Overall, we found only moderate improvement in guideline adherence and three-year overall survival during the 13-year study time period. This study showed underutilization of stage specific guideline concordant care for stage I and II/III disease. MDPI 2020-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7816178/ /pubmed/33704182 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28010017 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Stahl, Kelly A.
Olecki, Elizabeth J.
Dixon, Matthew E.
Peng, June S.
Torres, Madeline B.
Gusani, Niraj J.
Shen, Chan
Gastric Cancer Treatments and Survival Trends in the United States
title Gastric Cancer Treatments and Survival Trends in the United States
title_full Gastric Cancer Treatments and Survival Trends in the United States
title_fullStr Gastric Cancer Treatments and Survival Trends in the United States
title_full_unstemmed Gastric Cancer Treatments and Survival Trends in the United States
title_short Gastric Cancer Treatments and Survival Trends in the United States
title_sort gastric cancer treatments and survival trends in the united states
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7816178/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33704182
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28010017
work_keys_str_mv AT stahlkellya gastriccancertreatmentsandsurvivaltrendsintheunitedstates
AT oleckielizabethj gastriccancertreatmentsandsurvivaltrendsintheunitedstates
AT dixonmatthewe gastriccancertreatmentsandsurvivaltrendsintheunitedstates
AT pengjunes gastriccancertreatmentsandsurvivaltrendsintheunitedstates
AT torresmadelineb gastriccancertreatmentsandsurvivaltrendsintheunitedstates
AT gusaninirajj gastriccancertreatmentsandsurvivaltrendsintheunitedstates
AT shenchan gastriccancertreatmentsandsurvivaltrendsintheunitedstates