Cargando…

A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Ambulatory Oncology Experience by Treatment Intent

The Ambulatory Oncology Patient Satisfaction Survey (AOPSS) is a standardized instrument to assess the overall cancer patient experience. This study retrospectively investigated differences in care experiences and satisfaction among ambulatory oncology patients who self-identified as receiving outpa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Watson, Linda, Qi, Siwei, Photitai, Eclair, DeIure, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7816180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33704180
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28010013
_version_ 1783638389058174976
author Watson, Linda
Qi, Siwei
Photitai, Eclair
DeIure, Andrea
author_facet Watson, Linda
Qi, Siwei
Photitai, Eclair
DeIure, Andrea
author_sort Watson, Linda
collection PubMed
description The Ambulatory Oncology Patient Satisfaction Survey (AOPSS) is a standardized instrument to assess the overall cancer patient experience. This study retrospectively investigated differences in care experiences and satisfaction among ambulatory oncology patients who self-identified as receiving outpatient therapies for curative intent or for symptom or disease control. This cross-sectional study analyzed data from the AOPSS collected between February and April 2019 within the provincial cancer program in Alberta, Canada. There were 2104 participants who returned the survey, representing a 52.7% response rate. This nationally validated survey gathers patient care experiences and satisfaction across six domains of person-centred care. Treatment intent was characterized by adding a new “goal of treatment” question. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann–Whitney U tests and analysis of covariance (ANCOVAs). Cancer patients’ treatment goals were found to be significantly associated with key patient characteristics like age, sex, tumour group, and the locations where they received care. Patients whose self-identified goal of treatment was to cure their cancer reported significantly higher levels of satisfaction and a more positive experience in five out of the six person-centred care domains. Results identify marked differences in satisfaction and experience between these two patient groups even though they both received care in the same ambulatory environments. A better understanding of the experience and satisfaction of non-curative cancer patients could allow for a more holistic and supportive approach to patient care. In addition, an early palliative approach to care is recommended for improved patient outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7816180
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78161802021-01-27 A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Ambulatory Oncology Experience by Treatment Intent Watson, Linda Qi, Siwei Photitai, Eclair DeIure, Andrea Curr Oncol Article The Ambulatory Oncology Patient Satisfaction Survey (AOPSS) is a standardized instrument to assess the overall cancer patient experience. This study retrospectively investigated differences in care experiences and satisfaction among ambulatory oncology patients who self-identified as receiving outpatient therapies for curative intent or for symptom or disease control. This cross-sectional study analyzed data from the AOPSS collected between February and April 2019 within the provincial cancer program in Alberta, Canada. There were 2104 participants who returned the survey, representing a 52.7% response rate. This nationally validated survey gathers patient care experiences and satisfaction across six domains of person-centred care. Treatment intent was characterized by adding a new “goal of treatment” question. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann–Whitney U tests and analysis of covariance (ANCOVAs). Cancer patients’ treatment goals were found to be significantly associated with key patient characteristics like age, sex, tumour group, and the locations where they received care. Patients whose self-identified goal of treatment was to cure their cancer reported significantly higher levels of satisfaction and a more positive experience in five out of the six person-centred care domains. Results identify marked differences in satisfaction and experience between these two patient groups even though they both received care in the same ambulatory environments. A better understanding of the experience and satisfaction of non-curative cancer patients could allow for a more holistic and supportive approach to patient care. In addition, an early palliative approach to care is recommended for improved patient outcomes. MDPI 2020-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7816180/ /pubmed/33704180 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28010013 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Watson, Linda
Qi, Siwei
Photitai, Eclair
DeIure, Andrea
A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Ambulatory Oncology Experience by Treatment Intent
title A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Ambulatory Oncology Experience by Treatment Intent
title_full A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Ambulatory Oncology Experience by Treatment Intent
title_fullStr A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Ambulatory Oncology Experience by Treatment Intent
title_full_unstemmed A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Ambulatory Oncology Experience by Treatment Intent
title_short A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Ambulatory Oncology Experience by Treatment Intent
title_sort cross-sectional analysis of ambulatory oncology experience by treatment intent
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7816180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33704180
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol28010013
work_keys_str_mv AT watsonlinda acrosssectionalanalysisofambulatoryoncologyexperiencebytreatmentintent
AT qisiwei acrosssectionalanalysisofambulatoryoncologyexperiencebytreatmentintent
AT photitaieclair acrosssectionalanalysisofambulatoryoncologyexperiencebytreatmentintent
AT deiureandrea acrosssectionalanalysisofambulatoryoncologyexperiencebytreatmentintent
AT watsonlinda crosssectionalanalysisofambulatoryoncologyexperiencebytreatmentintent
AT qisiwei crosssectionalanalysisofambulatoryoncologyexperiencebytreatmentintent
AT photitaieclair crosssectionalanalysisofambulatoryoncologyexperiencebytreatmentintent
AT deiureandrea crosssectionalanalysisofambulatoryoncologyexperiencebytreatmentintent