Cargando…

Medial frontal negativities predict performance improvements during motor sequence but not motor adaptation learning

Alterations in our environment require us to learn or alter motor skills to remain efficient. Also, damage or injury may require the relearning of motor skills. Two types have been identified: movement adaptation and motor sequence learning. Doyonet al. (2003, Distinct contribution of the cortico‐st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matsuhashi, Takuto, Segalowitz, Sidney J., Murphy, Timothy I., Nagano, Yuichiro, Hirao, Takahiro, Masaki, Hiroaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7816271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33111987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13708
_version_ 1783638409501212672
author Matsuhashi, Takuto
Segalowitz, Sidney J.
Murphy, Timothy I.
Nagano, Yuichiro
Hirao, Takahiro
Masaki, Hiroaki
author_facet Matsuhashi, Takuto
Segalowitz, Sidney J.
Murphy, Timothy I.
Nagano, Yuichiro
Hirao, Takahiro
Masaki, Hiroaki
author_sort Matsuhashi, Takuto
collection PubMed
description Alterations in our environment require us to learn or alter motor skills to remain efficient. Also, damage or injury may require the relearning of motor skills. Two types have been identified: movement adaptation and motor sequence learning. Doyonet al. (2003, Distinct contribution of the cortico‐striatal and cortico‐cerebellar systems to motor skill learning. Neuropsychologia, 41(3), 252‐262) proposed a model to explain the neural mechanisms related to adaptation (cortico‐cerebellar) and motor sequence learning (cortico‐striatum) tasks. We hypothesized that medial frontal negativities (MFNs), event‐related electrocortical responses including the error‐related negativity (ERN) and correct‐response‐related negativity (CRN), would be trait biomarkers for skill in motor sequence learning due to their relationship with striatal neural generators in a network involving the anterior cingulate and possibly the supplementary motor area. We examined 36 participants' improvement in a motor adaptation and a motor sequence learning task and measured MFNs elicited in a separate Spatial Stroop (conflict) task. We found both ERN and CRN strongly predicted performance improvement in the sequential motor task but not in the adaptation task, supporting this aspect of the Doyon model. Interestingly, the CRN accounted for additional unique variance over the variance shared with the ERN suggesting an expansion of the model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7816271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78162712021-01-27 Medial frontal negativities predict performance improvements during motor sequence but not motor adaptation learning Matsuhashi, Takuto Segalowitz, Sidney J. Murphy, Timothy I. Nagano, Yuichiro Hirao, Takahiro Masaki, Hiroaki Psychophysiology Original Articles Alterations in our environment require us to learn or alter motor skills to remain efficient. Also, damage or injury may require the relearning of motor skills. Two types have been identified: movement adaptation and motor sequence learning. Doyonet al. (2003, Distinct contribution of the cortico‐striatal and cortico‐cerebellar systems to motor skill learning. Neuropsychologia, 41(3), 252‐262) proposed a model to explain the neural mechanisms related to adaptation (cortico‐cerebellar) and motor sequence learning (cortico‐striatum) tasks. We hypothesized that medial frontal negativities (MFNs), event‐related electrocortical responses including the error‐related negativity (ERN) and correct‐response‐related negativity (CRN), would be trait biomarkers for skill in motor sequence learning due to their relationship with striatal neural generators in a network involving the anterior cingulate and possibly the supplementary motor area. We examined 36 participants' improvement in a motor adaptation and a motor sequence learning task and measured MFNs elicited in a separate Spatial Stroop (conflict) task. We found both ERN and CRN strongly predicted performance improvement in the sequential motor task but not in the adaptation task, supporting this aspect of the Doyon model. Interestingly, the CRN accounted for additional unique variance over the variance shared with the ERN suggesting an expansion of the model. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-27 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7816271/ /pubmed/33111987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13708 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Psychophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Psychophysiological Research This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Matsuhashi, Takuto
Segalowitz, Sidney J.
Murphy, Timothy I.
Nagano, Yuichiro
Hirao, Takahiro
Masaki, Hiroaki
Medial frontal negativities predict performance improvements during motor sequence but not motor adaptation learning
title Medial frontal negativities predict performance improvements during motor sequence but not motor adaptation learning
title_full Medial frontal negativities predict performance improvements during motor sequence but not motor adaptation learning
title_fullStr Medial frontal negativities predict performance improvements during motor sequence but not motor adaptation learning
title_full_unstemmed Medial frontal negativities predict performance improvements during motor sequence but not motor adaptation learning
title_short Medial frontal negativities predict performance improvements during motor sequence but not motor adaptation learning
title_sort medial frontal negativities predict performance improvements during motor sequence but not motor adaptation learning
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7816271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33111987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13708
work_keys_str_mv AT matsuhashitakuto medialfrontalnegativitiespredictperformanceimprovementsduringmotorsequencebutnotmotoradaptationlearning
AT segalowitzsidneyj medialfrontalnegativitiespredictperformanceimprovementsduringmotorsequencebutnotmotoradaptationlearning
AT murphytimothyi medialfrontalnegativitiespredictperformanceimprovementsduringmotorsequencebutnotmotoradaptationlearning
AT naganoyuichiro medialfrontalnegativitiespredictperformanceimprovementsduringmotorsequencebutnotmotoradaptationlearning
AT hiraotakahiro medialfrontalnegativitiespredictperformanceimprovementsduringmotorsequencebutnotmotoradaptationlearning
AT masakihiroaki medialfrontalnegativitiespredictperformanceimprovementsduringmotorsequencebutnotmotoradaptationlearning