Cargando…
Barriers to using HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and sexual behaviour after stopping PrEP: a cross-sectional study in Germany
BACKGROUND: Persistence of individuals at risk of HIV with Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) is critical for its impact on the HIV epidemic. We analysed factors associated with stopping PrEP, barriers that may deter people from continuing PrEP and investigated sexual behaviour after stopping PrEP. MET...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7816315/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33468089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10174-4 |
_version_ | 1783638418906939392 |
---|---|
author | Koppe, Uwe Marcus, Ulrich Albrecht, Stefan Jansen, Klaus Jessen, Heiko Gunsenheimer-Bartmeyer, Barbara Bremer, Viviane |
author_facet | Koppe, Uwe Marcus, Ulrich Albrecht, Stefan Jansen, Klaus Jessen, Heiko Gunsenheimer-Bartmeyer, Barbara Bremer, Viviane |
author_sort | Koppe, Uwe |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Persistence of individuals at risk of HIV with Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) is critical for its impact on the HIV epidemic. We analysed factors associated with stopping PrEP, barriers that may deter people from continuing PrEP and investigated sexual behaviour after stopping PrEP. METHODS: Current and former PrEP users in Germany were recruited to complete an anonymous online survey on PrEP use and sexual behaviour. Participants were recruited through dating apps, a PrEP community website, anonymous testing sites and peers. The results were analysed using descriptive methods and logistic regression. RESULTS: We recruited 4848 current and 609 former PrEP users in two study waves (July–October 2018, April–June 2019). Former PrEP users were more likely 18–29 years old than current users (adjusted OR = 1.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1–2.3). Moreover, they were more often unhappy with their sex life, which was more pronounced in former daily PrEP users (aOR = 4.5, 95% CI 2.9–7.1) compared to former on-demand users (aOR = 1.8, 95% CI 1.1–2.9, p(interaction) = 0.005). The most common reason for stopping PrEP was a reduced need for PrEP (49.1%). However, 31.4% of former users identified logistic reasons and 17.5% stopped due to side effects. Former PrEP users using PrEP < 3 months were more likely to stop PrEP due to concerns over long-term side effects (32.0% vs. 22.5%, p = 0.015) and not wanting to take a chemical substance (33.2% vs. 24.0%, p = 0.020) compared to former PrEP users who used PrEP for longer. After stopping PrEP, 18.7% of former PrEP users indicated inconsistent condom use while having ≥4 sex partners within the previous 6 months. Former PrEP users with many partners and inconsistent condom use more often indicated logistic reasons for stopping (46.5% vs. 27.9%, p < 0.001) than did other former PrEP users. CONCLUSIONS: To maximise persistence with PrEP we need to develop strategies for younger PrEP users, reduce logistic barriers to access PrEP, and to develop effective communication on side-effect management. Moreover, prevention strategies for people stopping PrEP are required, since some remain at high risk for HIV. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-10174-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7816315 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78163152021-01-21 Barriers to using HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and sexual behaviour after stopping PrEP: a cross-sectional study in Germany Koppe, Uwe Marcus, Ulrich Albrecht, Stefan Jansen, Klaus Jessen, Heiko Gunsenheimer-Bartmeyer, Barbara Bremer, Viviane BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Persistence of individuals at risk of HIV with Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) is critical for its impact on the HIV epidemic. We analysed factors associated with stopping PrEP, barriers that may deter people from continuing PrEP and investigated sexual behaviour after stopping PrEP. METHODS: Current and former PrEP users in Germany were recruited to complete an anonymous online survey on PrEP use and sexual behaviour. Participants were recruited through dating apps, a PrEP community website, anonymous testing sites and peers. The results were analysed using descriptive methods and logistic regression. RESULTS: We recruited 4848 current and 609 former PrEP users in two study waves (July–October 2018, April–June 2019). Former PrEP users were more likely 18–29 years old than current users (adjusted OR = 1.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1–2.3). Moreover, they were more often unhappy with their sex life, which was more pronounced in former daily PrEP users (aOR = 4.5, 95% CI 2.9–7.1) compared to former on-demand users (aOR = 1.8, 95% CI 1.1–2.9, p(interaction) = 0.005). The most common reason for stopping PrEP was a reduced need for PrEP (49.1%). However, 31.4% of former users identified logistic reasons and 17.5% stopped due to side effects. Former PrEP users using PrEP < 3 months were more likely to stop PrEP due to concerns over long-term side effects (32.0% vs. 22.5%, p = 0.015) and not wanting to take a chemical substance (33.2% vs. 24.0%, p = 0.020) compared to former PrEP users who used PrEP for longer. After stopping PrEP, 18.7% of former PrEP users indicated inconsistent condom use while having ≥4 sex partners within the previous 6 months. Former PrEP users with many partners and inconsistent condom use more often indicated logistic reasons for stopping (46.5% vs. 27.9%, p < 0.001) than did other former PrEP users. CONCLUSIONS: To maximise persistence with PrEP we need to develop strategies for younger PrEP users, reduce logistic barriers to access PrEP, and to develop effective communication on side-effect management. Moreover, prevention strategies for people stopping PrEP are required, since some remain at high risk for HIV. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-10174-4. BioMed Central 2021-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7816315/ /pubmed/33468089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10174-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Koppe, Uwe Marcus, Ulrich Albrecht, Stefan Jansen, Klaus Jessen, Heiko Gunsenheimer-Bartmeyer, Barbara Bremer, Viviane Barriers to using HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and sexual behaviour after stopping PrEP: a cross-sectional study in Germany |
title | Barriers to using HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and sexual behaviour after stopping PrEP: a cross-sectional study in Germany |
title_full | Barriers to using HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and sexual behaviour after stopping PrEP: a cross-sectional study in Germany |
title_fullStr | Barriers to using HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and sexual behaviour after stopping PrEP: a cross-sectional study in Germany |
title_full_unstemmed | Barriers to using HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and sexual behaviour after stopping PrEP: a cross-sectional study in Germany |
title_short | Barriers to using HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and sexual behaviour after stopping PrEP: a cross-sectional study in Germany |
title_sort | barriers to using hiv pre-exposure prophylaxis (prep) and sexual behaviour after stopping prep: a cross-sectional study in germany |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7816315/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33468089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10174-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT koppeuwe barrierstousinghivpreexposureprophylaxisprepandsexualbehaviourafterstoppingprepacrosssectionalstudyingermany AT marcusulrich barrierstousinghivpreexposureprophylaxisprepandsexualbehaviourafterstoppingprepacrosssectionalstudyingermany AT albrechtstefan barrierstousinghivpreexposureprophylaxisprepandsexualbehaviourafterstoppingprepacrosssectionalstudyingermany AT jansenklaus barrierstousinghivpreexposureprophylaxisprepandsexualbehaviourafterstoppingprepacrosssectionalstudyingermany AT jessenheiko barrierstousinghivpreexposureprophylaxisprepandsexualbehaviourafterstoppingprepacrosssectionalstudyingermany AT gunsenheimerbartmeyerbarbara barrierstousinghivpreexposureprophylaxisprepandsexualbehaviourafterstoppingprepacrosssectionalstudyingermany AT bremerviviane barrierstousinghivpreexposureprophylaxisprepandsexualbehaviourafterstoppingprepacrosssectionalstudyingermany |