Cargando…

A novel method of grading gastric intestinal metaplasia based on the combination of subtype and distribution

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown the value of subtypes and distribution of gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) for prediction of gastric cancer. We aim to combine GIM subtypes and distribution to form a new scoring system for GIM. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study. No GIM, type I, II, and III...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wei, Ning, Zhong, Zhiheng, Shi, Ruihua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7816327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33472622
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12935-021-01758-6
_version_ 1783638420586758144
author Wei, Ning
Zhong, Zhiheng
Shi, Ruihua
author_facet Wei, Ning
Zhong, Zhiheng
Shi, Ruihua
author_sort Wei, Ning
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Studies have shown the value of subtypes and distribution of gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) for prediction of gastric cancer. We aim to combine GIM subtypes and distribution to form a new scoring system for GIM. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study. No GIM, type I, II, and III GIM of gastric antrum and corpus scored 0–3 points respectively. Then the severity of the whole stomach was calculated in two ways: 1. The gastric antrum and corpus scores were added together, with a score ranging from 0 to 6, which named “Subtype Distribution Score of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia (SDSGIM)”. 2. Direct classification according to a table corresponding to that of OLGIM. We compared the SDSGIM among benign lesions, dysplasia, and cancer and drew receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to determine the optimal cut-off value. According to the cut-off value and the classification from the table, the predictive ability of these two methods were calculated. RESULTS: 227 patients were included. For SDSGIM, benign lesion group was significantly different from dysplasia or cancer group. Area under curve of ROC curve was 0.889 ± 0.023. The optimal cut-off value was 3. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of SDSGIM for malignancy were 89.5%, 78.0%, 74.6%, 91.2% and 82.8%. And those for the second classification method were 84.2%, 82.6%, 77.7%, 87.9%, and 83.3% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study firstly combined GIM subtypes with its distribution forming a novel scoring system, which showed high prediction accuracy for malignant lesions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7816327
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78163272021-01-21 A novel method of grading gastric intestinal metaplasia based on the combination of subtype and distribution Wei, Ning Zhong, Zhiheng Shi, Ruihua Cancer Cell Int Primary Research BACKGROUND: Studies have shown the value of subtypes and distribution of gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) for prediction of gastric cancer. We aim to combine GIM subtypes and distribution to form a new scoring system for GIM. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study. No GIM, type I, II, and III GIM of gastric antrum and corpus scored 0–3 points respectively. Then the severity of the whole stomach was calculated in two ways: 1. The gastric antrum and corpus scores were added together, with a score ranging from 0 to 6, which named “Subtype Distribution Score of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia (SDSGIM)”. 2. Direct classification according to a table corresponding to that of OLGIM. We compared the SDSGIM among benign lesions, dysplasia, and cancer and drew receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to determine the optimal cut-off value. According to the cut-off value and the classification from the table, the predictive ability of these two methods were calculated. RESULTS: 227 patients were included. For SDSGIM, benign lesion group was significantly different from dysplasia or cancer group. Area under curve of ROC curve was 0.889 ± 0.023. The optimal cut-off value was 3. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of SDSGIM for malignancy were 89.5%, 78.0%, 74.6%, 91.2% and 82.8%. And those for the second classification method were 84.2%, 82.6%, 77.7%, 87.9%, and 83.3% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study firstly combined GIM subtypes with its distribution forming a novel scoring system, which showed high prediction accuracy for malignant lesions. BioMed Central 2021-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7816327/ /pubmed/33472622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12935-021-01758-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Primary Research
Wei, Ning
Zhong, Zhiheng
Shi, Ruihua
A novel method of grading gastric intestinal metaplasia based on the combination of subtype and distribution
title A novel method of grading gastric intestinal metaplasia based on the combination of subtype and distribution
title_full A novel method of grading gastric intestinal metaplasia based on the combination of subtype and distribution
title_fullStr A novel method of grading gastric intestinal metaplasia based on the combination of subtype and distribution
title_full_unstemmed A novel method of grading gastric intestinal metaplasia based on the combination of subtype and distribution
title_short A novel method of grading gastric intestinal metaplasia based on the combination of subtype and distribution
title_sort novel method of grading gastric intestinal metaplasia based on the combination of subtype and distribution
topic Primary Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7816327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33472622
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12935-021-01758-6
work_keys_str_mv AT weining anovelmethodofgradinggastricintestinalmetaplasiabasedonthecombinationofsubtypeanddistribution
AT zhongzhiheng anovelmethodofgradinggastricintestinalmetaplasiabasedonthecombinationofsubtypeanddistribution
AT shiruihua anovelmethodofgradinggastricintestinalmetaplasiabasedonthecombinationofsubtypeanddistribution
AT weining novelmethodofgradinggastricintestinalmetaplasiabasedonthecombinationofsubtypeanddistribution
AT zhongzhiheng novelmethodofgradinggastricintestinalmetaplasiabasedonthecombinationofsubtypeanddistribution
AT shiruihua novelmethodofgradinggastricintestinalmetaplasiabasedonthecombinationofsubtypeanddistribution