Cargando…

Vocational rehabilitation to enhance return to work after trauma (ROWTATE): protocol for a non-randomised single-arm mixed-methods feasibility study

BACKGROUND: Traumatic injuries are common amongst working-age adults. Survivors often experience physical and psychological problems, reduced quality of life and difficulty returning to work. Vocational rehabilitation improves work outcomes for a range of conditions but evidence of effectiveness for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kendrick, Denise, das Nair, Roshan, Kellezi, Blerina, Morriss, Richard, Kettlewell, Jade, Holmes, Jain, Timmons, Stephen, Bridger, Kay, Patel, Priya, Brooks, Adam, Hoffman, Karen, Radford, Kathryn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7816441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33472707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00769-4
_version_ 1783638443074519040
author Kendrick, Denise
das Nair, Roshan
Kellezi, Blerina
Morriss, Richard
Kettlewell, Jade
Holmes, Jain
Timmons, Stephen
Bridger, Kay
Patel, Priya
Brooks, Adam
Hoffman, Karen
Radford, Kathryn
author_facet Kendrick, Denise
das Nair, Roshan
Kellezi, Blerina
Morriss, Richard
Kettlewell, Jade
Holmes, Jain
Timmons, Stephen
Bridger, Kay
Patel, Priya
Brooks, Adam
Hoffman, Karen
Radford, Kathryn
author_sort Kendrick, Denise
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Traumatic injuries are common amongst working-age adults. Survivors often experience physical and psychological problems, reduced quality of life and difficulty returning to work. Vocational rehabilitation improves work outcomes for a range of conditions but evidence of effectiveness for those with traumatic injuries is lacking. This study assesses feasibility of delivering a vocational rehabilitation intervention to enhance return to work and improve quality of life and wellbeing in people with at least moderate trauma to inform design of a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT). METHODS: Non-randomised, single-arm, multi-centre mixed-methods feasibility study with nested case studies and qualitative study. The case studies comprise interviews, observations of clinical contacts and review of clinical records. The qualitative study comprises interviews and/or focus groups. Participants will be recruited from two UK major trauma centres. Participants will comprise 40 patients aged 16–69 with an injury severity score of > 8 who will receive the intervention and complete questionnaires. Interviews will be conducted with 10 patients and their occupational therapists (OTs), clinical psychologists (CPs), employers and commissioners of rehabilitation services. Fidelity will be assessed in up to six patients by observations of OT and CP—patient contacts, review of patient records and intervention case report forms. OT and CP training will be evaluated using questionnaires and competence to deliver the intervention assessed using a team objective structured clinical examination and written task. Patients participating in and those declining participation in the study will be invited to take part in interviews/focus groups to explore barriers and facilitators to recruitment and retention. Outcomes include recruitment and retention rates, intervention fidelity, OT and CP competence to deliver the intervention, experiences of delivering or receiving the intervention and factors likely to influence definitive trial delivery. DISCUSSION: Effective vocational rehabilitation interventions to enhance return to work amongst trauma patients are urgently needed because return to work is often delayed, with detrimental effects on health, financial stability, healthcare resource use and wider society. This protocol describes a feasibility study delivering a complex intervention to enhance return to work in those with at least moderate trauma. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN: 74668529. Prospectively registered on 23 January 20
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7816441
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78164412021-01-22 Vocational rehabilitation to enhance return to work after trauma (ROWTATE): protocol for a non-randomised single-arm mixed-methods feasibility study Kendrick, Denise das Nair, Roshan Kellezi, Blerina Morriss, Richard Kettlewell, Jade Holmes, Jain Timmons, Stephen Bridger, Kay Patel, Priya Brooks, Adam Hoffman, Karen Radford, Kathryn Pilot Feasibility Stud Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Traumatic injuries are common amongst working-age adults. Survivors often experience physical and psychological problems, reduced quality of life and difficulty returning to work. Vocational rehabilitation improves work outcomes for a range of conditions but evidence of effectiveness for those with traumatic injuries is lacking. This study assesses feasibility of delivering a vocational rehabilitation intervention to enhance return to work and improve quality of life and wellbeing in people with at least moderate trauma to inform design of a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT). METHODS: Non-randomised, single-arm, multi-centre mixed-methods feasibility study with nested case studies and qualitative study. The case studies comprise interviews, observations of clinical contacts and review of clinical records. The qualitative study comprises interviews and/or focus groups. Participants will be recruited from two UK major trauma centres. Participants will comprise 40 patients aged 16–69 with an injury severity score of > 8 who will receive the intervention and complete questionnaires. Interviews will be conducted with 10 patients and their occupational therapists (OTs), clinical psychologists (CPs), employers and commissioners of rehabilitation services. Fidelity will be assessed in up to six patients by observations of OT and CP—patient contacts, review of patient records and intervention case report forms. OT and CP training will be evaluated using questionnaires and competence to deliver the intervention assessed using a team objective structured clinical examination and written task. Patients participating in and those declining participation in the study will be invited to take part in interviews/focus groups to explore barriers and facilitators to recruitment and retention. Outcomes include recruitment and retention rates, intervention fidelity, OT and CP competence to deliver the intervention, experiences of delivering or receiving the intervention and factors likely to influence definitive trial delivery. DISCUSSION: Effective vocational rehabilitation interventions to enhance return to work amongst trauma patients are urgently needed because return to work is often delayed, with detrimental effects on health, financial stability, healthcare resource use and wider society. This protocol describes a feasibility study delivering a complex intervention to enhance return to work in those with at least moderate trauma. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN: 74668529. Prospectively registered on 23 January 20 BioMed Central 2021-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7816441/ /pubmed/33472707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00769-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Kendrick, Denise
das Nair, Roshan
Kellezi, Blerina
Morriss, Richard
Kettlewell, Jade
Holmes, Jain
Timmons, Stephen
Bridger, Kay
Patel, Priya
Brooks, Adam
Hoffman, Karen
Radford, Kathryn
Vocational rehabilitation to enhance return to work after trauma (ROWTATE): protocol for a non-randomised single-arm mixed-methods feasibility study
title Vocational rehabilitation to enhance return to work after trauma (ROWTATE): protocol for a non-randomised single-arm mixed-methods feasibility study
title_full Vocational rehabilitation to enhance return to work after trauma (ROWTATE): protocol for a non-randomised single-arm mixed-methods feasibility study
title_fullStr Vocational rehabilitation to enhance return to work after trauma (ROWTATE): protocol for a non-randomised single-arm mixed-methods feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed Vocational rehabilitation to enhance return to work after trauma (ROWTATE): protocol for a non-randomised single-arm mixed-methods feasibility study
title_short Vocational rehabilitation to enhance return to work after trauma (ROWTATE): protocol for a non-randomised single-arm mixed-methods feasibility study
title_sort vocational rehabilitation to enhance return to work after trauma (rowtate): protocol for a non-randomised single-arm mixed-methods feasibility study
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7816441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33472707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-021-00769-4
work_keys_str_mv AT kendrickdenise vocationalrehabilitationtoenhancereturntoworkaftertraumarowtateprotocolforanonrandomisedsinglearmmixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy
AT dasnairroshan vocationalrehabilitationtoenhancereturntoworkaftertraumarowtateprotocolforanonrandomisedsinglearmmixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy
AT kelleziblerina vocationalrehabilitationtoenhancereturntoworkaftertraumarowtateprotocolforanonrandomisedsinglearmmixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy
AT morrissrichard vocationalrehabilitationtoenhancereturntoworkaftertraumarowtateprotocolforanonrandomisedsinglearmmixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy
AT kettlewelljade vocationalrehabilitationtoenhancereturntoworkaftertraumarowtateprotocolforanonrandomisedsinglearmmixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy
AT holmesjain vocationalrehabilitationtoenhancereturntoworkaftertraumarowtateprotocolforanonrandomisedsinglearmmixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy
AT timmonsstephen vocationalrehabilitationtoenhancereturntoworkaftertraumarowtateprotocolforanonrandomisedsinglearmmixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy
AT bridgerkay vocationalrehabilitationtoenhancereturntoworkaftertraumarowtateprotocolforanonrandomisedsinglearmmixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy
AT patelpriya vocationalrehabilitationtoenhancereturntoworkaftertraumarowtateprotocolforanonrandomisedsinglearmmixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy
AT brooksadam vocationalrehabilitationtoenhancereturntoworkaftertraumarowtateprotocolforanonrandomisedsinglearmmixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy
AT hoffmankaren vocationalrehabilitationtoenhancereturntoworkaftertraumarowtateprotocolforanonrandomisedsinglearmmixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy
AT radfordkathryn vocationalrehabilitationtoenhancereturntoworkaftertraumarowtateprotocolforanonrandomisedsinglearmmixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy
AT vocationalrehabilitationtoenhancereturntoworkaftertraumarowtateprotocolforanonrandomisedsinglearmmixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy