Cargando…

Validación de una técnica de PCR dúplex usando el gen E y RNasa P para el diagnóstico de SARS-CoV-2

INTRODUCTION: Reverse transcriptase - polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the standard technique for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. The World Health Organization recommends the Charité-Berlin protocol for COVID-19 diagnosis, which requires triple PCR, limiting the process capability of laboratories and del...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Palacio Rua, Katherine, García Correa, Juan Felipe, Aguilar-Jiménez, Wbeimar, Afanador Ayala, Carlos, Rugeles, María Teresa, Zuluaga, Andrés F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Authors. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. on behalf of Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7816606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33618853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eimc.2020.12.014
_version_ 1783638478042431488
author Palacio Rua, Katherine
García Correa, Juan Felipe
Aguilar-Jiménez, Wbeimar
Afanador Ayala, Carlos
Rugeles, María Teresa
Zuluaga, Andrés F.
author_facet Palacio Rua, Katherine
García Correa, Juan Felipe
Aguilar-Jiménez, Wbeimar
Afanador Ayala, Carlos
Rugeles, María Teresa
Zuluaga, Andrés F.
author_sort Palacio Rua, Katherine
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Reverse transcriptase - polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the standard technique for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. The World Health Organization recommends the Charité-Berlin protocol for COVID-19 diagnosis, which requires triple PCR, limiting the process capability of laboratories and delaying the results. In order to reduce these limitations, a duplex PCR is validated for the detection of the E and RNase P genes. METHODS: We compared the limit of detection, sensitivity and specificity of the duplex PCR technique (E gene and RNase P) against the monoplex standard (E gene) in RNA samples from a SARS-CoV-2 isolate and 88 clinical specimens with previously known results. The repeatability and reproducibility of the threshold cycle values (Ct) were determined in two independent laboratories of the Faculty of Medicine of the Universidad de Antioquia, using different reagents and real time instruments. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the Ct results between both techniques (p = 0.84). Using the monoplex PCR of E gene as a reference, the interrater reliability analysis showed similarity between the two techniques, with a kappa coefficient of 0.89, the sensitivity and the specificity of duplex PCR were 90% and 87%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Duplex PCR does not affect the sensitivity and specificity reported by the Charité, Berlin protocol, being a useful tool for SARS-CoV-2 screening in clinical samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7816606
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Authors. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. on behalf of Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78166062021-01-21 Validación de una técnica de PCR dúplex usando el gen E y RNasa P para el diagnóstico de SARS-CoV-2 Palacio Rua, Katherine García Correa, Juan Felipe Aguilar-Jiménez, Wbeimar Afanador Ayala, Carlos Rugeles, María Teresa Zuluaga, Andrés F. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin Original INTRODUCTION: Reverse transcriptase - polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the standard technique for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. The World Health Organization recommends the Charité-Berlin protocol for COVID-19 diagnosis, which requires triple PCR, limiting the process capability of laboratories and delaying the results. In order to reduce these limitations, a duplex PCR is validated for the detection of the E and RNase P genes. METHODS: We compared the limit of detection, sensitivity and specificity of the duplex PCR technique (E gene and RNase P) against the monoplex standard (E gene) in RNA samples from a SARS-CoV-2 isolate and 88 clinical specimens with previously known results. The repeatability and reproducibility of the threshold cycle values (Ct) were determined in two independent laboratories of the Faculty of Medicine of the Universidad de Antioquia, using different reagents and real time instruments. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the Ct results between both techniques (p = 0.84). Using the monoplex PCR of E gene as a reference, the interrater reliability analysis showed similarity between the two techniques, with a kappa coefficient of 0.89, the sensitivity and the specificity of duplex PCR were 90% and 87%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Duplex PCR does not affect the sensitivity and specificity reported by the Charité, Berlin protocol, being a useful tool for SARS-CoV-2 screening in clinical samples. The Authors. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. on behalf of Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica. 2022-10 2021-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7816606/ /pubmed/33618853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eimc.2020.12.014 Text en © 2021 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Original
Palacio Rua, Katherine
García Correa, Juan Felipe
Aguilar-Jiménez, Wbeimar
Afanador Ayala, Carlos
Rugeles, María Teresa
Zuluaga, Andrés F.
Validación de una técnica de PCR dúplex usando el gen E y RNasa P para el diagnóstico de SARS-CoV-2
title Validación de una técnica de PCR dúplex usando el gen E y RNasa P para el diagnóstico de SARS-CoV-2
title_full Validación de una técnica de PCR dúplex usando el gen E y RNasa P para el diagnóstico de SARS-CoV-2
title_fullStr Validación de una técnica de PCR dúplex usando el gen E y RNasa P para el diagnóstico de SARS-CoV-2
title_full_unstemmed Validación de una técnica de PCR dúplex usando el gen E y RNasa P para el diagnóstico de SARS-CoV-2
title_short Validación de una técnica de PCR dúplex usando el gen E y RNasa P para el diagnóstico de SARS-CoV-2
title_sort validación de una técnica de pcr dúplex usando el gen e y rnasa p para el diagnóstico de sars-cov-2
topic Original
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7816606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33618853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eimc.2020.12.014
work_keys_str_mv AT palacioruakatherine validaciondeunatecnicadepcrduplexusandoelgeneyrnasapparaeldiagnosticodesarscov2
AT garciacorreajuanfelipe validaciondeunatecnicadepcrduplexusandoelgeneyrnasapparaeldiagnosticodesarscov2
AT aguilarjimenezwbeimar validaciondeunatecnicadepcrduplexusandoelgeneyrnasapparaeldiagnosticodesarscov2
AT afanadorayalacarlos validaciondeunatecnicadepcrduplexusandoelgeneyrnasapparaeldiagnosticodesarscov2
AT rugelesmariateresa validaciondeunatecnicadepcrduplexusandoelgeneyrnasapparaeldiagnosticodesarscov2
AT zuluagaandresf validaciondeunatecnicadepcrduplexusandoelgeneyrnasapparaeldiagnosticodesarscov2