Cargando…

FIB-5 versus FIB-4 index for assessment of hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B affected patients

AIM OF THE STUDY: Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is one of the major health problems worldwide. Use of non-invasive tests for assessment of hepatic fibrosis such as the FIB-4 index could be used to avoid liver biopsy. Another promising noninvasive test, FIB-5, could also be used to detect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Metwally, Khaled, Elsabaawy, Maha, Abdel-Samiee, Mohamed, Morad, Wessam, Ehsan, Nermine, Abdelsameea, Eman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7816634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33511281
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ceh.2020.102157
_version_ 1783638484554088448
author Metwally, Khaled
Elsabaawy, Maha
Abdel-Samiee, Mohamed
Morad, Wessam
Ehsan, Nermine
Abdelsameea, Eman
author_facet Metwally, Khaled
Elsabaawy, Maha
Abdel-Samiee, Mohamed
Morad, Wessam
Ehsan, Nermine
Abdelsameea, Eman
author_sort Metwally, Khaled
collection PubMed
description AIM OF THE STUDY: Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is one of the major health problems worldwide. Use of non-invasive tests for assessment of hepatic fibrosis such as the FIB-4 index could be used to avoid liver biopsy. Another promising noninvasive test, FIB-5, could also be used to detect significant hepatic fibrosis. The aim of the study was to compare the use of FIB-5 and FIB-4 as noninvasive markers to assess chronic HBV-related hepatic fibrosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study was done on 176 chronic HBV patients who underwent liver biopsy. Grading and staging of liver fibrosis was done according to the METAVIR scoring system. FIB-5 and FIB-4 scores were calculated for all patients. RESULTS: As regards FIB-4 for differentiation between non-significant fibrosis (group I) and significant fibrosis (group II), at a cutoff level of 1.28 with positive predictive value (PPV) 41.4% and specificity 48% while at a cutoff level of 7.08 with PPV 98.8% and specificity 98% for FIB-5. CONCLUSIONS: As regards both scores, the FIB-5 score was more specific than FIB-4 for diagnosing significant from nonsignificant hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic HBV infection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7816634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78166342021-01-27 FIB-5 versus FIB-4 index for assessment of hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B affected patients Metwally, Khaled Elsabaawy, Maha Abdel-Samiee, Mohamed Morad, Wessam Ehsan, Nermine Abdelsameea, Eman Clin Exp Hepatol Original Paper AIM OF THE STUDY: Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is one of the major health problems worldwide. Use of non-invasive tests for assessment of hepatic fibrosis such as the FIB-4 index could be used to avoid liver biopsy. Another promising noninvasive test, FIB-5, could also be used to detect significant hepatic fibrosis. The aim of the study was to compare the use of FIB-5 and FIB-4 as noninvasive markers to assess chronic HBV-related hepatic fibrosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study was done on 176 chronic HBV patients who underwent liver biopsy. Grading and staging of liver fibrosis was done according to the METAVIR scoring system. FIB-5 and FIB-4 scores were calculated for all patients. RESULTS: As regards FIB-4 for differentiation between non-significant fibrosis (group I) and significant fibrosis (group II), at a cutoff level of 1.28 with positive predictive value (PPV) 41.4% and specificity 48% while at a cutoff level of 7.08 with PPV 98.8% and specificity 98% for FIB-5. CONCLUSIONS: As regards both scores, the FIB-5 score was more specific than FIB-4 for diagnosing significant from nonsignificant hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic HBV infection. Termedia Publishing House 2020-12-30 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7816634/ /pubmed/33511281 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ceh.2020.102157 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Clinical and Experimental Hepatology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Metwally, Khaled
Elsabaawy, Maha
Abdel-Samiee, Mohamed
Morad, Wessam
Ehsan, Nermine
Abdelsameea, Eman
FIB-5 versus FIB-4 index for assessment of hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B affected patients
title FIB-5 versus FIB-4 index for assessment of hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B affected patients
title_full FIB-5 versus FIB-4 index for assessment of hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B affected patients
title_fullStr FIB-5 versus FIB-4 index for assessment of hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B affected patients
title_full_unstemmed FIB-5 versus FIB-4 index for assessment of hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B affected patients
title_short FIB-5 versus FIB-4 index for assessment of hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B affected patients
title_sort fib-5 versus fib-4 index for assessment of hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis b affected patients
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7816634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33511281
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ceh.2020.102157
work_keys_str_mv AT metwallykhaled fib5versusfib4indexforassessmentofhepaticfibrosisinchronichepatitisbaffectedpatients
AT elsabaawymaha fib5versusfib4indexforassessmentofhepaticfibrosisinchronichepatitisbaffectedpatients
AT abdelsamieemohamed fib5versusfib4indexforassessmentofhepaticfibrosisinchronichepatitisbaffectedpatients
AT moradwessam fib5versusfib4indexforassessmentofhepaticfibrosisinchronichepatitisbaffectedpatients
AT ehsannermine fib5versusfib4indexforassessmentofhepaticfibrosisinchronichepatitisbaffectedpatients
AT abdelsameeaeman fib5versusfib4indexforassessmentofhepaticfibrosisinchronichepatitisbaffectedpatients