Cargando…

Long‐term outcome of intraventricular conduction delays in the general population

BACKGROUND: Previous population studies have presented conflicting results regarding the prognostic impact of intraventricular conduction delays (IVCD). METHODS: We studied long‐term prognostic impact and the association with comorbidities of eight IVCDs in a random sample of 6,299 Finnish subjects...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rankinen, Jani, Haataja, Petri, Lyytikäinen, Leo‐Pekka, Huhtala, Heini, Lehtimäki, Terho, Kähönen, Mika, Eskola, Markku, Pérez‐Riera, Andrés Ricardo, Jula, Antti, Rissanen, Harri, Nikus, Kjell, Hernesniemi, Jussi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7816813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32804416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anec.12788
_version_ 1783638513010343936
author Rankinen, Jani
Haataja, Petri
Lyytikäinen, Leo‐Pekka
Huhtala, Heini
Lehtimäki, Terho
Kähönen, Mika
Eskola, Markku
Pérez‐Riera, Andrés Ricardo
Jula, Antti
Rissanen, Harri
Nikus, Kjell
Hernesniemi, Jussi
author_facet Rankinen, Jani
Haataja, Petri
Lyytikäinen, Leo‐Pekka
Huhtala, Heini
Lehtimäki, Terho
Kähönen, Mika
Eskola, Markku
Pérez‐Riera, Andrés Ricardo
Jula, Antti
Rissanen, Harri
Nikus, Kjell
Hernesniemi, Jussi
author_sort Rankinen, Jani
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous population studies have presented conflicting results regarding the prognostic impact of intraventricular conduction delays (IVCD). METHODS: We studied long‐term prognostic impact and the association with comorbidities of eight IVCDs in a random sample of 6,299 Finnish subjects (2,857 men and 3,442 women, mean age 52.8, SD 14.9 years) aged 30 or over who participated in the health examination including 12‐lead ECG. For left bundle branch block (LBBB) and non‐specific IVCD (NSIVCD), two different definitions were used. RESULTS: During 16.5 years’ follow‐up, 1,309 of the 6,299 subjects (20.8%) died and of these 655 (10.4%) were cardiovascular (CV) deaths. After controlling for known clinical risk factors, the hazard ratio for CV death, compared with individuals without IVCD, was 1.55 for the Minnesota definition of LBBB (95% confidence interval 1.04–2.31, p = .032) and 1.27 (95% confidence interval 0.80–2.02, p = .308) for the Strauss’ definition of LBBB. Subjects with NSIVCD were associated with twofold to threefold increase in CV mortality depending on the definition. While right bundle branch block, left anterior fascicular block and incomplete bundle branch blocks were associated with seemingly higher mortality, this was no longer the case after adjustment for age and sex. The presence of R‐R’ pattern was not associated with any adverse outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In a population study with long‐term follow‐up, NSIVCD and Minnesota definition of LBBB were independently associated with CV mortality. Other IVCDs had no significant impact on prognosis. The prognostic impact of LBBB and NSIVCD was affected by the definition of the conduction disorder.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7816813
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78168132021-01-29 Long‐term outcome of intraventricular conduction delays in the general population Rankinen, Jani Haataja, Petri Lyytikäinen, Leo‐Pekka Huhtala, Heini Lehtimäki, Terho Kähönen, Mika Eskola, Markku Pérez‐Riera, Andrés Ricardo Jula, Antti Rissanen, Harri Nikus, Kjell Hernesniemi, Jussi Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Original Articles BACKGROUND: Previous population studies have presented conflicting results regarding the prognostic impact of intraventricular conduction delays (IVCD). METHODS: We studied long‐term prognostic impact and the association with comorbidities of eight IVCDs in a random sample of 6,299 Finnish subjects (2,857 men and 3,442 women, mean age 52.8, SD 14.9 years) aged 30 or over who participated in the health examination including 12‐lead ECG. For left bundle branch block (LBBB) and non‐specific IVCD (NSIVCD), two different definitions were used. RESULTS: During 16.5 years’ follow‐up, 1,309 of the 6,299 subjects (20.8%) died and of these 655 (10.4%) were cardiovascular (CV) deaths. After controlling for known clinical risk factors, the hazard ratio for CV death, compared with individuals without IVCD, was 1.55 for the Minnesota definition of LBBB (95% confidence interval 1.04–2.31, p = .032) and 1.27 (95% confidence interval 0.80–2.02, p = .308) for the Strauss’ definition of LBBB. Subjects with NSIVCD were associated with twofold to threefold increase in CV mortality depending on the definition. While right bundle branch block, left anterior fascicular block and incomplete bundle branch blocks were associated with seemingly higher mortality, this was no longer the case after adjustment for age and sex. The presence of R‐R’ pattern was not associated with any adverse outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In a population study with long‐term follow‐up, NSIVCD and Minnesota definition of LBBB were independently associated with CV mortality. Other IVCDs had no significant impact on prognosis. The prognostic impact of LBBB and NSIVCD was affected by the definition of the conduction disorder. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7816813/ /pubmed/32804416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anec.12788 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Rankinen, Jani
Haataja, Petri
Lyytikäinen, Leo‐Pekka
Huhtala, Heini
Lehtimäki, Terho
Kähönen, Mika
Eskola, Markku
Pérez‐Riera, Andrés Ricardo
Jula, Antti
Rissanen, Harri
Nikus, Kjell
Hernesniemi, Jussi
Long‐term outcome of intraventricular conduction delays in the general population
title Long‐term outcome of intraventricular conduction delays in the general population
title_full Long‐term outcome of intraventricular conduction delays in the general population
title_fullStr Long‐term outcome of intraventricular conduction delays in the general population
title_full_unstemmed Long‐term outcome of intraventricular conduction delays in the general population
title_short Long‐term outcome of intraventricular conduction delays in the general population
title_sort long‐term outcome of intraventricular conduction delays in the general population
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7816813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32804416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anec.12788
work_keys_str_mv AT rankinenjani longtermoutcomeofintraventricularconductiondelaysinthegeneralpopulation
AT haatajapetri longtermoutcomeofintraventricularconductiondelaysinthegeneralpopulation
AT lyytikainenleopekka longtermoutcomeofintraventricularconductiondelaysinthegeneralpopulation
AT huhtalaheini longtermoutcomeofintraventricularconductiondelaysinthegeneralpopulation
AT lehtimakiterho longtermoutcomeofintraventricularconductiondelaysinthegeneralpopulation
AT kahonenmika longtermoutcomeofintraventricularconductiondelaysinthegeneralpopulation
AT eskolamarkku longtermoutcomeofintraventricularconductiondelaysinthegeneralpopulation
AT perezrieraandresricardo longtermoutcomeofintraventricularconductiondelaysinthegeneralpopulation
AT julaantti longtermoutcomeofintraventricularconductiondelaysinthegeneralpopulation
AT rissanenharri longtermoutcomeofintraventricularconductiondelaysinthegeneralpopulation
AT nikuskjell longtermoutcomeofintraventricularconductiondelaysinthegeneralpopulation
AT hernesniemijussi longtermoutcomeofintraventricularconductiondelaysinthegeneralpopulation