Cargando…
Long‐term outcome of intraventricular conduction delays in the general population
BACKGROUND: Previous population studies have presented conflicting results regarding the prognostic impact of intraventricular conduction delays (IVCD). METHODS: We studied long‐term prognostic impact and the association with comorbidities of eight IVCDs in a random sample of 6,299 Finnish subjects...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7816813/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32804416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anec.12788 |
_version_ | 1783638513010343936 |
---|---|
author | Rankinen, Jani Haataja, Petri Lyytikäinen, Leo‐Pekka Huhtala, Heini Lehtimäki, Terho Kähönen, Mika Eskola, Markku Pérez‐Riera, Andrés Ricardo Jula, Antti Rissanen, Harri Nikus, Kjell Hernesniemi, Jussi |
author_facet | Rankinen, Jani Haataja, Petri Lyytikäinen, Leo‐Pekka Huhtala, Heini Lehtimäki, Terho Kähönen, Mika Eskola, Markku Pérez‐Riera, Andrés Ricardo Jula, Antti Rissanen, Harri Nikus, Kjell Hernesniemi, Jussi |
author_sort | Rankinen, Jani |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Previous population studies have presented conflicting results regarding the prognostic impact of intraventricular conduction delays (IVCD). METHODS: We studied long‐term prognostic impact and the association with comorbidities of eight IVCDs in a random sample of 6,299 Finnish subjects (2,857 men and 3,442 women, mean age 52.8, SD 14.9 years) aged 30 or over who participated in the health examination including 12‐lead ECG. For left bundle branch block (LBBB) and non‐specific IVCD (NSIVCD), two different definitions were used. RESULTS: During 16.5 years’ follow‐up, 1,309 of the 6,299 subjects (20.8%) died and of these 655 (10.4%) were cardiovascular (CV) deaths. After controlling for known clinical risk factors, the hazard ratio for CV death, compared with individuals without IVCD, was 1.55 for the Minnesota definition of LBBB (95% confidence interval 1.04–2.31, p = .032) and 1.27 (95% confidence interval 0.80–2.02, p = .308) for the Strauss’ definition of LBBB. Subjects with NSIVCD were associated with twofold to threefold increase in CV mortality depending on the definition. While right bundle branch block, left anterior fascicular block and incomplete bundle branch blocks were associated with seemingly higher mortality, this was no longer the case after adjustment for age and sex. The presence of R‐R’ pattern was not associated with any adverse outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In a population study with long‐term follow‐up, NSIVCD and Minnesota definition of LBBB were independently associated with CV mortality. Other IVCDs had no significant impact on prognosis. The prognostic impact of LBBB and NSIVCD was affected by the definition of the conduction disorder. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7816813 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78168132021-01-29 Long‐term outcome of intraventricular conduction delays in the general population Rankinen, Jani Haataja, Petri Lyytikäinen, Leo‐Pekka Huhtala, Heini Lehtimäki, Terho Kähönen, Mika Eskola, Markku Pérez‐Riera, Andrés Ricardo Jula, Antti Rissanen, Harri Nikus, Kjell Hernesniemi, Jussi Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Original Articles BACKGROUND: Previous population studies have presented conflicting results regarding the prognostic impact of intraventricular conduction delays (IVCD). METHODS: We studied long‐term prognostic impact and the association with comorbidities of eight IVCDs in a random sample of 6,299 Finnish subjects (2,857 men and 3,442 women, mean age 52.8, SD 14.9 years) aged 30 or over who participated in the health examination including 12‐lead ECG. For left bundle branch block (LBBB) and non‐specific IVCD (NSIVCD), two different definitions were used. RESULTS: During 16.5 years’ follow‐up, 1,309 of the 6,299 subjects (20.8%) died and of these 655 (10.4%) were cardiovascular (CV) deaths. After controlling for known clinical risk factors, the hazard ratio for CV death, compared with individuals without IVCD, was 1.55 for the Minnesota definition of LBBB (95% confidence interval 1.04–2.31, p = .032) and 1.27 (95% confidence interval 0.80–2.02, p = .308) for the Strauss’ definition of LBBB. Subjects with NSIVCD were associated with twofold to threefold increase in CV mortality depending on the definition. While right bundle branch block, left anterior fascicular block and incomplete bundle branch blocks were associated with seemingly higher mortality, this was no longer the case after adjustment for age and sex. The presence of R‐R’ pattern was not associated with any adverse outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In a population study with long‐term follow‐up, NSIVCD and Minnesota definition of LBBB were independently associated with CV mortality. Other IVCDs had no significant impact on prognosis. The prognostic impact of LBBB and NSIVCD was affected by the definition of the conduction disorder. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7816813/ /pubmed/32804416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anec.12788 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Rankinen, Jani Haataja, Petri Lyytikäinen, Leo‐Pekka Huhtala, Heini Lehtimäki, Terho Kähönen, Mika Eskola, Markku Pérez‐Riera, Andrés Ricardo Jula, Antti Rissanen, Harri Nikus, Kjell Hernesniemi, Jussi Long‐term outcome of intraventricular conduction delays in the general population |
title | Long‐term outcome of intraventricular conduction delays in the general population |
title_full | Long‐term outcome of intraventricular conduction delays in the general population |
title_fullStr | Long‐term outcome of intraventricular conduction delays in the general population |
title_full_unstemmed | Long‐term outcome of intraventricular conduction delays in the general population |
title_short | Long‐term outcome of intraventricular conduction delays in the general population |
title_sort | long‐term outcome of intraventricular conduction delays in the general population |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7816813/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32804416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anec.12788 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rankinenjani longtermoutcomeofintraventricularconductiondelaysinthegeneralpopulation AT haatajapetri longtermoutcomeofintraventricularconductiondelaysinthegeneralpopulation AT lyytikainenleopekka longtermoutcomeofintraventricularconductiondelaysinthegeneralpopulation AT huhtalaheini longtermoutcomeofintraventricularconductiondelaysinthegeneralpopulation AT lehtimakiterho longtermoutcomeofintraventricularconductiondelaysinthegeneralpopulation AT kahonenmika longtermoutcomeofintraventricularconductiondelaysinthegeneralpopulation AT eskolamarkku longtermoutcomeofintraventricularconductiondelaysinthegeneralpopulation AT perezrieraandresricardo longtermoutcomeofintraventricularconductiondelaysinthegeneralpopulation AT julaantti longtermoutcomeofintraventricularconductiondelaysinthegeneralpopulation AT rissanenharri longtermoutcomeofintraventricularconductiondelaysinthegeneralpopulation AT nikuskjell longtermoutcomeofintraventricularconductiondelaysinthegeneralpopulation AT hernesniemijussi longtermoutcomeofintraventricularconductiondelaysinthegeneralpopulation |