Cargando…

Ancient DNA from Guam and the peopling of the Pacific

Humans reached the Mariana Islands in the western Pacific by ∼3,500 y ago, contemporaneous with or even earlier than the initial peopling of Polynesia. They crossed more than 2,000 km of open ocean to get there, whereas voyages of similar length did not occur anywhere else until more than 2,000 y la...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pugach, Irina, Hübner, Alexander, Hung, Hsiao-chun, Meyer, Matthias, Carson, Mike T., Stoneking, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Academy of Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7817125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33443177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2022112118
_version_ 1783638579821412352
author Pugach, Irina
Hübner, Alexander
Hung, Hsiao-chun
Meyer, Matthias
Carson, Mike T.
Stoneking, Mark
author_facet Pugach, Irina
Hübner, Alexander
Hung, Hsiao-chun
Meyer, Matthias
Carson, Mike T.
Stoneking, Mark
author_sort Pugach, Irina
collection PubMed
description Humans reached the Mariana Islands in the western Pacific by ∼3,500 y ago, contemporaneous with or even earlier than the initial peopling of Polynesia. They crossed more than 2,000 km of open ocean to get there, whereas voyages of similar length did not occur anywhere else until more than 2,000 y later. Yet, the settlement of Polynesia has received far more attention than the settlement of the Marianas. There is uncertainty over both the origin of the first colonizers of the Marianas (with different lines of evidence suggesting variously the Philippines, Indonesia, New Guinea, or the Bismarck Archipelago) as well as what, if any, relationship they might have had with the first colonizers of Polynesia. To address these questions, we obtained ancient DNA data from two skeletons from the Ritidian Beach Cave Site in northern Guam, dating to ∼2,200 y ago. Analyses of complete mitochondrial DNA genome sequences and genome-wide SNP data strongly support ancestry from the Philippines, in agreement with some interpretations of the linguistic and archaeological evidence, but in contradiction to results based on computer simulations of sea voyaging. We also find a close link between the ancient Guam skeletons and early Lapita individuals from Vanuatu and Tonga, suggesting that the Marianas and Polynesia were colonized from the same source population, and raising the possibility that the Marianas played a role in the eventual settlement of Polynesia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7817125
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher National Academy of Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78171252021-01-28 Ancient DNA from Guam and the peopling of the Pacific Pugach, Irina Hübner, Alexander Hung, Hsiao-chun Meyer, Matthias Carson, Mike T. Stoneking, Mark Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Biological Sciences Humans reached the Mariana Islands in the western Pacific by ∼3,500 y ago, contemporaneous with or even earlier than the initial peopling of Polynesia. They crossed more than 2,000 km of open ocean to get there, whereas voyages of similar length did not occur anywhere else until more than 2,000 y later. Yet, the settlement of Polynesia has received far more attention than the settlement of the Marianas. There is uncertainty over both the origin of the first colonizers of the Marianas (with different lines of evidence suggesting variously the Philippines, Indonesia, New Guinea, or the Bismarck Archipelago) as well as what, if any, relationship they might have had with the first colonizers of Polynesia. To address these questions, we obtained ancient DNA data from two skeletons from the Ritidian Beach Cave Site in northern Guam, dating to ∼2,200 y ago. Analyses of complete mitochondrial DNA genome sequences and genome-wide SNP data strongly support ancestry from the Philippines, in agreement with some interpretations of the linguistic and archaeological evidence, but in contradiction to results based on computer simulations of sea voyaging. We also find a close link between the ancient Guam skeletons and early Lapita individuals from Vanuatu and Tonga, suggesting that the Marianas and Polynesia were colonized from the same source population, and raising the possibility that the Marianas played a role in the eventual settlement of Polynesia. National Academy of Sciences 2021-01-05 2020-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7817125/ /pubmed/33443177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2022112118 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Biological Sciences
Pugach, Irina
Hübner, Alexander
Hung, Hsiao-chun
Meyer, Matthias
Carson, Mike T.
Stoneking, Mark
Ancient DNA from Guam and the peopling of the Pacific
title Ancient DNA from Guam and the peopling of the Pacific
title_full Ancient DNA from Guam and the peopling of the Pacific
title_fullStr Ancient DNA from Guam and the peopling of the Pacific
title_full_unstemmed Ancient DNA from Guam and the peopling of the Pacific
title_short Ancient DNA from Guam and the peopling of the Pacific
title_sort ancient dna from guam and the peopling of the pacific
topic Biological Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7817125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33443177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2022112118
work_keys_str_mv AT pugachirina ancientdnafromguamandthepeoplingofthepacific
AT hubneralexander ancientdnafromguamandthepeoplingofthepacific
AT hunghsiaochun ancientdnafromguamandthepeoplingofthepacific
AT meyermatthias ancientdnafromguamandthepeoplingofthepacific
AT carsonmiket ancientdnafromguamandthepeoplingofthepacific
AT stonekingmark ancientdnafromguamandthepeoplingofthepacific