Cargando…
Incorporating ethics and welfare into randomized experiments
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) enroll hundreds of millions of subjects and involve many human lives. To improve subjects’ welfare, I propose a design of RCTs that I call Experiment-as-Market (EXAM). EXAM produces a welfare-maximizing allocation of treatment-assignment probabilities, is almost i...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Academy of Sciences
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7817215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33443151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2008740118 |
_version_ | 1783638589256499200 |
---|---|
author | Narita, Yusuke |
author_facet | Narita, Yusuke |
author_sort | Narita, Yusuke |
collection | PubMed |
description | Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) enroll hundreds of millions of subjects and involve many human lives. To improve subjects’ welfare, I propose a design of RCTs that I call Experiment-as-Market (EXAM). EXAM produces a welfare-maximizing allocation of treatment-assignment probabilities, is almost incentive-compatible for preference elicitation, and unbiasedly estimates any causal effect estimable with standard RCTs. I quantify these properties by applying EXAM to a water-cleaning experiment in Kenya. In this empirical setting, compared to standard RCTs, EXAM improves subjects’ predicted well-being while reaching similar treatment-effect estimates with similar precision. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7817215 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | National Academy of Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78172152021-01-28 Incorporating ethics and welfare into randomized experiments Narita, Yusuke Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Social Sciences Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) enroll hundreds of millions of subjects and involve many human lives. To improve subjects’ welfare, I propose a design of RCTs that I call Experiment-as-Market (EXAM). EXAM produces a welfare-maximizing allocation of treatment-assignment probabilities, is almost incentive-compatible for preference elicitation, and unbiasedly estimates any causal effect estimable with standard RCTs. I quantify these properties by applying EXAM to a water-cleaning experiment in Kenya. In this empirical setting, compared to standard RCTs, EXAM improves subjects’ predicted well-being while reaching similar treatment-effect estimates with similar precision. National Academy of Sciences 2021-01-05 2020-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7817215/ /pubmed/33443151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2008740118 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Social Sciences Narita, Yusuke Incorporating ethics and welfare into randomized experiments |
title | Incorporating ethics and welfare into randomized experiments |
title_full | Incorporating ethics and welfare into randomized experiments |
title_fullStr | Incorporating ethics and welfare into randomized experiments |
title_full_unstemmed | Incorporating ethics and welfare into randomized experiments |
title_short | Incorporating ethics and welfare into randomized experiments |
title_sort | incorporating ethics and welfare into randomized experiments |
topic | Social Sciences |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7817215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33443151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2008740118 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT naritayusuke incorporatingethicsandwelfareintorandomizedexperiments |