Cargando…

Incorporating ethics and welfare into randomized experiments

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) enroll hundreds of millions of subjects and involve many human lives. To improve subjects’ welfare, I propose a design of RCTs that I call Experiment-as-Market (EXAM). EXAM produces a welfare-maximizing allocation of treatment-assignment probabilities, is almost i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Narita, Yusuke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Academy of Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7817215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33443151
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2008740118
_version_ 1783638589256499200
author Narita, Yusuke
author_facet Narita, Yusuke
author_sort Narita, Yusuke
collection PubMed
description Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) enroll hundreds of millions of subjects and involve many human lives. To improve subjects’ welfare, I propose a design of RCTs that I call Experiment-as-Market (EXAM). EXAM produces a welfare-maximizing allocation of treatment-assignment probabilities, is almost incentive-compatible for preference elicitation, and unbiasedly estimates any causal effect estimable with standard RCTs. I quantify these properties by applying EXAM to a water-cleaning experiment in Kenya. In this empirical setting, compared to standard RCTs, EXAM improves subjects’ predicted well-being while reaching similar treatment-effect estimates with similar precision.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7817215
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher National Academy of Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78172152021-01-28 Incorporating ethics and welfare into randomized experiments Narita, Yusuke Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Social Sciences Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) enroll hundreds of millions of subjects and involve many human lives. To improve subjects’ welfare, I propose a design of RCTs that I call Experiment-as-Market (EXAM). EXAM produces a welfare-maximizing allocation of treatment-assignment probabilities, is almost incentive-compatible for preference elicitation, and unbiasedly estimates any causal effect estimable with standard RCTs. I quantify these properties by applying EXAM to a water-cleaning experiment in Kenya. In this empirical setting, compared to standard RCTs, EXAM improves subjects’ predicted well-being while reaching similar treatment-effect estimates with similar precision. National Academy of Sciences 2021-01-05 2020-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7817215/ /pubmed/33443151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2008740118 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Social Sciences
Narita, Yusuke
Incorporating ethics and welfare into randomized experiments
title Incorporating ethics and welfare into randomized experiments
title_full Incorporating ethics and welfare into randomized experiments
title_fullStr Incorporating ethics and welfare into randomized experiments
title_full_unstemmed Incorporating ethics and welfare into randomized experiments
title_short Incorporating ethics and welfare into randomized experiments
title_sort incorporating ethics and welfare into randomized experiments
topic Social Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7817215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33443151
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2008740118
work_keys_str_mv AT naritayusuke incorporatingethicsandwelfareintorandomizedexperiments