Cargando…

Pars Plana Vitrectomy versus Intravitreal Injection of Ranibizumab in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema Associated with Vitreomacular Interface Abnormalities

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) versus intravitreal injection (IVI) of ranibizumab (RBZ) in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) associated with vitreomacular interface abnormalities (VMIA). METHODS: The records of patients presenting with DME and VMIA throug...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elkayal, Hassan, Bedda, Ahmed M., El-Goweini, Hesham, Souka, Ahmed A., Gomaa, Amir Ramadan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7817299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33520299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6699668
_version_ 1783638606438465536
author Elkayal, Hassan
Bedda, Ahmed M.
El-Goweini, Hesham
Souka, Ahmed A.
Gomaa, Amir Ramadan
author_facet Elkayal, Hassan
Bedda, Ahmed M.
El-Goweini, Hesham
Souka, Ahmed A.
Gomaa, Amir Ramadan
author_sort Elkayal, Hassan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) versus intravitreal injection (IVI) of ranibizumab (RBZ) in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) associated with vitreomacular interface abnormalities (VMIA). METHODS: The records of patients presenting with DME and VMIA throughout 2016 to 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into 2 groups: group I received IVIs of RBZ and group II underwent PPV with internal limiting membrane peeling. The main outcome measures were the change in the LogMAR corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and central subfield thickness (CSFT) on optical coherence tomography over 6 months. RESULTS: At 6 months, mean CDVA improved by 0.22 ± 0.21 in group I patients (p < 0.001), while in group II, it improved only by 0.09 ± 0.22 (p < 0.115). Fifty-five percent of group I and 60% of group II patients had stable CDVA (within 2 lines from baseline) at 6 months. Significant improvement in vision (gain of 2 or more lines) was seen in 45% and 30%, respectively. Worsening of vision (loss of 2 or more lines) was seen only in 2 patients in group II, but none in group I. The mean CSFT improved significantly in both groups (by 162 µ and 216 µ, respectively; p < 0.001). The mean CSFT at 6 months was similar in both groups (354 µ and 311 µ, respectively; p=0.172). CONCLUSIONS: Both treatments resulted in anatomical improvement of DME with concurrent VMIA. Visual improvement was more pronounced in the IVI group, although this may have been affected by other confounding factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7817299
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78172992021-01-28 Pars Plana Vitrectomy versus Intravitreal Injection of Ranibizumab in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema Associated with Vitreomacular Interface Abnormalities Elkayal, Hassan Bedda, Ahmed M. El-Goweini, Hesham Souka, Ahmed A. Gomaa, Amir Ramadan J Ophthalmol Research Article PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) versus intravitreal injection (IVI) of ranibizumab (RBZ) in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) associated with vitreomacular interface abnormalities (VMIA). METHODS: The records of patients presenting with DME and VMIA throughout 2016 to 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into 2 groups: group I received IVIs of RBZ and group II underwent PPV with internal limiting membrane peeling. The main outcome measures were the change in the LogMAR corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and central subfield thickness (CSFT) on optical coherence tomography over 6 months. RESULTS: At 6 months, mean CDVA improved by 0.22 ± 0.21 in group I patients (p < 0.001), while in group II, it improved only by 0.09 ± 0.22 (p < 0.115). Fifty-five percent of group I and 60% of group II patients had stable CDVA (within 2 lines from baseline) at 6 months. Significant improvement in vision (gain of 2 or more lines) was seen in 45% and 30%, respectively. Worsening of vision (loss of 2 or more lines) was seen only in 2 patients in group II, but none in group I. The mean CSFT improved significantly in both groups (by 162 µ and 216 µ, respectively; p < 0.001). The mean CSFT at 6 months was similar in both groups (354 µ and 311 µ, respectively; p=0.172). CONCLUSIONS: Both treatments resulted in anatomical improvement of DME with concurrent VMIA. Visual improvement was more pronounced in the IVI group, although this may have been affected by other confounding factors. Hindawi 2021-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7817299/ /pubmed/33520299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6699668 Text en Copyright © 2021 Hassan Elkayal et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Elkayal, Hassan
Bedda, Ahmed M.
El-Goweini, Hesham
Souka, Ahmed A.
Gomaa, Amir Ramadan
Pars Plana Vitrectomy versus Intravitreal Injection of Ranibizumab in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema Associated with Vitreomacular Interface Abnormalities
title Pars Plana Vitrectomy versus Intravitreal Injection of Ranibizumab in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema Associated with Vitreomacular Interface Abnormalities
title_full Pars Plana Vitrectomy versus Intravitreal Injection of Ranibizumab in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema Associated with Vitreomacular Interface Abnormalities
title_fullStr Pars Plana Vitrectomy versus Intravitreal Injection of Ranibizumab in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema Associated with Vitreomacular Interface Abnormalities
title_full_unstemmed Pars Plana Vitrectomy versus Intravitreal Injection of Ranibizumab in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema Associated with Vitreomacular Interface Abnormalities
title_short Pars Plana Vitrectomy versus Intravitreal Injection of Ranibizumab in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema Associated with Vitreomacular Interface Abnormalities
title_sort pars plana vitrectomy versus intravitreal injection of ranibizumab in the treatment of diabetic macular edema associated with vitreomacular interface abnormalities
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7817299/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33520299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6699668
work_keys_str_mv AT elkayalhassan parsplanavitrectomyversusintravitrealinjectionofranibizumabinthetreatmentofdiabeticmacularedemaassociatedwithvitreomacularinterfaceabnormalities
AT beddaahmedm parsplanavitrectomyversusintravitrealinjectionofranibizumabinthetreatmentofdiabeticmacularedemaassociatedwithvitreomacularinterfaceabnormalities
AT elgoweinihesham parsplanavitrectomyversusintravitrealinjectionofranibizumabinthetreatmentofdiabeticmacularedemaassociatedwithvitreomacularinterfaceabnormalities
AT soukaahmeda parsplanavitrectomyversusintravitrealinjectionofranibizumabinthetreatmentofdiabeticmacularedemaassociatedwithvitreomacularinterfaceabnormalities
AT gomaaamirramadan parsplanavitrectomyversusintravitrealinjectionofranibizumabinthetreatmentofdiabeticmacularedemaassociatedwithvitreomacularinterfaceabnormalities