Cargando…

Oral minimal model-based estimates of insulin sensitivity in obese youth depend on oral glucose tolerance test protocol duration

INTRODUCTION: The Oral Minimal Model (OMM), a differential-equations based mathematical model of glucose-insulin dynamics, utilizes data from a frequently sampled oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) to quantify insulin sensitivity ([Formula: see text]). OMM-based estimates of [Formula: see text] can...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bartlette, Kai, Carreau, Anne-Marie, Xie, Danielle, Garcia-Reyes, Yesenia, Rahat, Haseeb, Pyle, Laura, Nadeau, Kristen J., Cree-Green, Melanie, Diniz Behn, Cecilia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7817496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33511337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.metop.2021.100078
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: The Oral Minimal Model (OMM), a differential-equations based mathematical model of glucose-insulin dynamics, utilizes data from a frequently sampled oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) to quantify insulin sensitivity ([Formula: see text]). OMM-based estimates of [Formula: see text] can detect differences in insulin resistance (IR) across population groups and quantify effects of clinical or behavioral interventions. These estimates of [Formula: see text] have been validated in healthy adults using data from OGTTs with durations from 2 to 7 h. However, data demonstrating how protocol duration affects [Formula: see text] estimates in highly IR populations such as adolescents with obesity are limited. METHODS: A 6-h frequently sampled OGTT was performed in adolescent females with obesity. Two, 3-, and 4- hour implementations of OMM assuming an exponentially-decaying rate of glucose appearance beyond measured glucose concentrations were compared to the 6-h implementation. A 4- hour OMM implementation with truncated data (4h Tr) was also considered. RESULTS: Data from 68 participants were included (age 15.8 ± 1.2 years, BMI 35.4 ± 5.6 kg/m(2)). Although [Formula: see text] values were highly correlated for all implementations, they varied with protocol duration (2h: 2.86 ± 3.31, 3h: 2.55 ± 2.62, 4h: 2.81 ± 2.59, 4h tr: 3.13 ± 3.14, 6h: 3.06 ± 2.85 x 10(-4) dl/kg/min per U/ml). [Formula: see text] estimates based on 2 or 3 h of data underestimated [Formula: see text] values, whereas 4-h [Formula: see text] estimates more closely approximated 6-h [Formula: see text] values. DISCUSSION: These results suggest that OGTT protocol duration should be considered when implementing OMM to estimate [Formula: see text] in adolescents with obesity and other IR populations.