Cargando…
Survey on evaluation methods for dialogue systems
In this paper, we survey the methods and concepts developed for the evaluation of dialogue systems. Evaluation, in and of itself, is a crucial part during the development process. Often, dialogue systems are evaluated by means of human evaluations and questionnaires. However, this tends to be very c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7817575/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33505103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10462-020-09866-x |
_version_ | 1783638668833980416 |
---|---|
author | Deriu, Jan Rodrigo, Alvaro Otegi, Arantxa Echegoyen, Guillermo Rosset, Sophie Agirre, Eneko Cieliebak, Mark |
author_facet | Deriu, Jan Rodrigo, Alvaro Otegi, Arantxa Echegoyen, Guillermo Rosset, Sophie Agirre, Eneko Cieliebak, Mark |
author_sort | Deriu, Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this paper, we survey the methods and concepts developed for the evaluation of dialogue systems. Evaluation, in and of itself, is a crucial part during the development process. Often, dialogue systems are evaluated by means of human evaluations and questionnaires. However, this tends to be very cost- and time-intensive. Thus, much work has been put into finding methods which allow a reduction in involvement of human labour. In this survey, we present the main concepts and methods. For this, we differentiate between the various classes of dialogue systems (task-oriented, conversational, and question-answering dialogue systems). We cover each class by introducing the main technologies developed for the dialogue systems and then present the evaluation methods regarding that class. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7817575 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78175752021-01-25 Survey on evaluation methods for dialogue systems Deriu, Jan Rodrigo, Alvaro Otegi, Arantxa Echegoyen, Guillermo Rosset, Sophie Agirre, Eneko Cieliebak, Mark Artif Intell Rev Article In this paper, we survey the methods and concepts developed for the evaluation of dialogue systems. Evaluation, in and of itself, is a crucial part during the development process. Often, dialogue systems are evaluated by means of human evaluations and questionnaires. However, this tends to be very cost- and time-intensive. Thus, much work has been put into finding methods which allow a reduction in involvement of human labour. In this survey, we present the main concepts and methods. For this, we differentiate between the various classes of dialogue systems (task-oriented, conversational, and question-answering dialogue systems). We cover each class by introducing the main technologies developed for the dialogue systems and then present the evaluation methods regarding that class. Springer Netherlands 2020-06-25 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7817575/ /pubmed/33505103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10462-020-09866-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Deriu, Jan Rodrigo, Alvaro Otegi, Arantxa Echegoyen, Guillermo Rosset, Sophie Agirre, Eneko Cieliebak, Mark Survey on evaluation methods for dialogue systems |
title | Survey on evaluation methods for dialogue systems |
title_full | Survey on evaluation methods for dialogue systems |
title_fullStr | Survey on evaluation methods for dialogue systems |
title_full_unstemmed | Survey on evaluation methods for dialogue systems |
title_short | Survey on evaluation methods for dialogue systems |
title_sort | survey on evaluation methods for dialogue systems |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7817575/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33505103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10462-020-09866-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deriujan surveyonevaluationmethodsfordialoguesystems AT rodrigoalvaro surveyonevaluationmethodsfordialoguesystems AT otegiarantxa surveyonevaluationmethodsfordialoguesystems AT echegoyenguillermo surveyonevaluationmethodsfordialoguesystems AT rossetsophie surveyonevaluationmethodsfordialoguesystems AT agirreeneko surveyonevaluationmethodsfordialoguesystems AT cieliebakmark surveyonevaluationmethodsfordialoguesystems |