Cargando…

Improved outcomes in metastatic germ cell cancer: results from a large cohort study

PURPOSE: Treatment of metastatic germ cell cancer (GCC) is based on the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) prognostic classification published in 1997. 5-year survival rates were reported to be 91%, 79%, and 48% for patients with good, intermediate and poor prognosis, respec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hentrich, Marcus, Debole, Jessica, Jurinovic, Vindi, Gerl, Arthur
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7817577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32772232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-020-03343-2
_version_ 1783638669056278528
author Hentrich, Marcus
Debole, Jessica
Jurinovic, Vindi
Gerl, Arthur
author_facet Hentrich, Marcus
Debole, Jessica
Jurinovic, Vindi
Gerl, Arthur
author_sort Hentrich, Marcus
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Treatment of metastatic germ cell cancer (GCC) is based on the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) prognostic classification published in 1997. 5-year survival rates were reported to be 91%, 79%, and 48% for patients with good, intermediate and poor prognosis, respectively. However, treatment results may have improved over time due to cumulative experience, improved supportive care and modern-type chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with metastatic GCC who received cisplatin-based chemotherapy at two institutions in Munich between 2000 and 2013 were retrospectively studied. Clinical characteristics, treatment and outcomes were analyzed with respect to the IGCCG prognostic classification. RESULTS: Of 225 patients (median age 35 years), 72 (32%) had seminoma (S) and 153 (68%) nonseminoma. 175 (78%), 30 (13%) and 20 patients (9%) had good, intermediate and poor prognosis according to the IGCCCG classification. The 2-year-progression free survival of patients with good, intermediate and poor prognosis was 91%, 83% and 37%, and the 5-year-overall survival (OS) was 98%, 96%, and 66%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the OS between patients in the good and intermediate prognosis group. CONCLUSION: Compared to data from the original IGCCCG classification system, the outcome of patients with metastatic GCC has considerably improved over time. While the prognosis of intermediate-risk patients is excellent, treatment in the poor-prognosis group remains to be improved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7817577
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78175772021-01-25 Improved outcomes in metastatic germ cell cancer: results from a large cohort study Hentrich, Marcus Debole, Jessica Jurinovic, Vindi Gerl, Arthur J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Original Article – Clinical Oncology PURPOSE: Treatment of metastatic germ cell cancer (GCC) is based on the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) prognostic classification published in 1997. 5-year survival rates were reported to be 91%, 79%, and 48% for patients with good, intermediate and poor prognosis, respectively. However, treatment results may have improved over time due to cumulative experience, improved supportive care and modern-type chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with metastatic GCC who received cisplatin-based chemotherapy at two institutions in Munich between 2000 and 2013 were retrospectively studied. Clinical characteristics, treatment and outcomes were analyzed with respect to the IGCCG prognostic classification. RESULTS: Of 225 patients (median age 35 years), 72 (32%) had seminoma (S) and 153 (68%) nonseminoma. 175 (78%), 30 (13%) and 20 patients (9%) had good, intermediate and poor prognosis according to the IGCCCG classification. The 2-year-progression free survival of patients with good, intermediate and poor prognosis was 91%, 83% and 37%, and the 5-year-overall survival (OS) was 98%, 96%, and 66%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the OS between patients in the good and intermediate prognosis group. CONCLUSION: Compared to data from the original IGCCCG classification system, the outcome of patients with metastatic GCC has considerably improved over time. While the prognosis of intermediate-risk patients is excellent, treatment in the poor-prognosis group remains to be improved. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-08-09 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7817577/ /pubmed/32772232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-020-03343-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article – Clinical Oncology
Hentrich, Marcus
Debole, Jessica
Jurinovic, Vindi
Gerl, Arthur
Improved outcomes in metastatic germ cell cancer: results from a large cohort study
title Improved outcomes in metastatic germ cell cancer: results from a large cohort study
title_full Improved outcomes in metastatic germ cell cancer: results from a large cohort study
title_fullStr Improved outcomes in metastatic germ cell cancer: results from a large cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Improved outcomes in metastatic germ cell cancer: results from a large cohort study
title_short Improved outcomes in metastatic germ cell cancer: results from a large cohort study
title_sort improved outcomes in metastatic germ cell cancer: results from a large cohort study
topic Original Article – Clinical Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7817577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32772232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-020-03343-2
work_keys_str_mv AT hentrichmarcus improvedoutcomesinmetastaticgermcellcancerresultsfromalargecohortstudy
AT debolejessica improvedoutcomesinmetastaticgermcellcancerresultsfromalargecohortstudy
AT jurinovicvindi improvedoutcomesinmetastaticgermcellcancerresultsfromalargecohortstudy
AT gerlarthur improvedoutcomesinmetastaticgermcellcancerresultsfromalargecohortstudy