Cargando…
Long-Term Survival in Nonsurgical Esophageal Cancer Patients Who Received Consolidation Chemotherapy Compared With Patients Who Received Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Alone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the standard treatment for nonsurgical esophageal cancer (EC). However, esophageal cancer patients receiving CCRT alone are still unsatisfactory in terms of local control and overall survival (OS) benefit. Clinicians generally add consolidation chem...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7817852/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33489910 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.604657 |
_version_ | 1783638721156874240 |
---|---|
author | Xia, Xiaojie Liu, Zeyuan Qin, Qin Di, Xiaoke Zhang, Zhaoyue Sun, Xinchen Ge, Xiaolin |
author_facet | Xia, Xiaojie Liu, Zeyuan Qin, Qin Di, Xiaoke Zhang, Zhaoyue Sun, Xinchen Ge, Xiaolin |
author_sort | Xia, Xiaojie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the standard treatment for nonsurgical esophageal cancer (EC). However, esophageal cancer patients receiving CCRT alone are still unsatisfactory in terms of local control and overall survival (OS) benefit. Clinicians generally add consolidation chemotherapy (CCT) after CCRT. It remains controversial whether CCT following CCRT is beneficial for esophageal cancer. We, therefore, undertook a meta-analysis to assess the need for CCT in inoperable esophageal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We combed PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CNKI for relevant published articles up to July 2020 that compared CCRT plus CCT to CCRT alone for patients with nonsurgical EC. Our primary endpoint was OS and progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoint was treatment toxicity. We analyzed the hazard ratio (HR) to estimate the time-to-event data and the odds ratio (OR) to compare the treatment-related effect. To assess heterogeneity, we performed the I(2) test and examined publication bias using funnel plots analysis. RESULTS: The 11 retrospective studies involved 2008 patients. Of these 2008 patients, 1018 received CCRT plus CCT, and 990 received CCRT. Compared to CCRT alone, CCT after CCRT did not improve disease control rate (DCR) (OR 1.66; 95% CI 0.53–5.15, p=0.384) and objective response rate (ORR) (OR 1.44; 95% CI 0.62–3.35, p=0.393). However, OS (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.59–0.86, p < 0.001) and PFS (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.44–0.84, p=0.003) did increase. Our results show that CCT plus CCRT had a clear survival advantage over CCRT alone. The risk of treatment toxicity did not increase for EC patients who received CCT. CONCLUSION: CCT after CCRT significantly increases OS and PFS in patients with nonsurgical EC and could provide them remarkable survival benefits. The results provide an evidence-based framework for the use of CCT after CCRT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7817852 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78178522021-01-22 Long-Term Survival in Nonsurgical Esophageal Cancer Patients Who Received Consolidation Chemotherapy Compared With Patients Who Received Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Alone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Xia, Xiaojie Liu, Zeyuan Qin, Qin Di, Xiaoke Zhang, Zhaoyue Sun, Xinchen Ge, Xiaolin Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the standard treatment for nonsurgical esophageal cancer (EC). However, esophageal cancer patients receiving CCRT alone are still unsatisfactory in terms of local control and overall survival (OS) benefit. Clinicians generally add consolidation chemotherapy (CCT) after CCRT. It remains controversial whether CCT following CCRT is beneficial for esophageal cancer. We, therefore, undertook a meta-analysis to assess the need for CCT in inoperable esophageal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We combed PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CNKI for relevant published articles up to July 2020 that compared CCRT plus CCT to CCRT alone for patients with nonsurgical EC. Our primary endpoint was OS and progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoint was treatment toxicity. We analyzed the hazard ratio (HR) to estimate the time-to-event data and the odds ratio (OR) to compare the treatment-related effect. To assess heterogeneity, we performed the I(2) test and examined publication bias using funnel plots analysis. RESULTS: The 11 retrospective studies involved 2008 patients. Of these 2008 patients, 1018 received CCRT plus CCT, and 990 received CCRT. Compared to CCRT alone, CCT after CCRT did not improve disease control rate (DCR) (OR 1.66; 95% CI 0.53–5.15, p=0.384) and objective response rate (ORR) (OR 1.44; 95% CI 0.62–3.35, p=0.393). However, OS (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.59–0.86, p < 0.001) and PFS (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.44–0.84, p=0.003) did increase. Our results show that CCT plus CCRT had a clear survival advantage over CCRT alone. The risk of treatment toxicity did not increase for EC patients who received CCT. CONCLUSION: CCT after CCRT significantly increases OS and PFS in patients with nonsurgical EC and could provide them remarkable survival benefits. The results provide an evidence-based framework for the use of CCT after CCRT. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7817852/ /pubmed/33489910 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.604657 Text en Copyright © 2021 Xia, Liu, Qin, Di, Zhang, Sun and Ge http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Xia, Xiaojie Liu, Zeyuan Qin, Qin Di, Xiaoke Zhang, Zhaoyue Sun, Xinchen Ge, Xiaolin Long-Term Survival in Nonsurgical Esophageal Cancer Patients Who Received Consolidation Chemotherapy Compared With Patients Who Received Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Alone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Long-Term Survival in Nonsurgical Esophageal Cancer Patients Who Received Consolidation Chemotherapy Compared With Patients Who Received Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Alone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Long-Term Survival in Nonsurgical Esophageal Cancer Patients Who Received Consolidation Chemotherapy Compared With Patients Who Received Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Alone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Long-Term Survival in Nonsurgical Esophageal Cancer Patients Who Received Consolidation Chemotherapy Compared With Patients Who Received Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Alone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Long-Term Survival in Nonsurgical Esophageal Cancer Patients Who Received Consolidation Chemotherapy Compared With Patients Who Received Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Alone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Long-Term Survival in Nonsurgical Esophageal Cancer Patients Who Received Consolidation Chemotherapy Compared With Patients Who Received Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Alone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | long-term survival in nonsurgical esophageal cancer patients who received consolidation chemotherapy compared with patients who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7817852/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33489910 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.604657 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiaxiaojie longtermsurvivalinnonsurgicalesophagealcancerpatientswhoreceivedconsolidationchemotherapycomparedwithpatientswhoreceivedconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuzeyuan longtermsurvivalinnonsurgicalesophagealcancerpatientswhoreceivedconsolidationchemotherapycomparedwithpatientswhoreceivedconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT qinqin longtermsurvivalinnonsurgicalesophagealcancerpatientswhoreceivedconsolidationchemotherapycomparedwithpatientswhoreceivedconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dixiaoke longtermsurvivalinnonsurgicalesophagealcancerpatientswhoreceivedconsolidationchemotherapycomparedwithpatientswhoreceivedconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangzhaoyue longtermsurvivalinnonsurgicalesophagealcancerpatientswhoreceivedconsolidationchemotherapycomparedwithpatientswhoreceivedconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sunxinchen longtermsurvivalinnonsurgicalesophagealcancerpatientswhoreceivedconsolidationchemotherapycomparedwithpatientswhoreceivedconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gexiaolin longtermsurvivalinnonsurgicalesophagealcancerpatientswhoreceivedconsolidationchemotherapycomparedwithpatientswhoreceivedconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |