Cargando…

OB Nest randomized controlled trial: a cost comparison of reduced visit compared to traditional prenatal care

BACKGROUND: Traditional prenatal care includes up to 13 in person office visits, and the cost of this care is not well-described. Alternative models are being explored to better meet the needs of patients and providers. OB Nest is a telemedicine-enhanced program with a reduced frequency of in-person...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Theiler, Regan N., Butler-Tobah, Yvonne, Hathcock, Matthew A., Famuyide, Abimbola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7818056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33478433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03557-3
_version_ 1783638754796240896
author Theiler, Regan N.
Butler-Tobah, Yvonne
Hathcock, Matthew A.
Famuyide, Abimbola
author_facet Theiler, Regan N.
Butler-Tobah, Yvonne
Hathcock, Matthew A.
Famuyide, Abimbola
author_sort Theiler, Regan N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Traditional prenatal care includes up to 13 in person office visits, and the cost of this care is not well-described. Alternative models are being explored to better meet the needs of patients and providers. OB Nest is a telemedicine-enhanced program with a reduced frequency of in-person prenatal visits. The cost implications of connected care services added to prenatal care packages are unclear. METHODS: Using data from the OB Nest randomized, controlled trial we analyzed the provider and staff time associated with prenatal care in the traditional and OB Nest models. Fewer visits were required for OB Nest, but given the compensatory increase in connected care activity and supplies, the actual cost difference is not known. Nursing and provider staff time was prospectively recorded for all patients enrolled in the OB Nest clinical trial. Published 2015 national wages for healthcare workers were used to calculate the actual labor cost of providing either traditional or OB Nest prenatal care in 2015 US dollars. Overhead expenses and opportunity costs were not considered. RESULTS: Total provider cost was decreased caring for the OB Nest participants, but nursing cost was increased. OB Nest care required an average of 160.8 (+/− 45.0) minutes provider time and 237 (+/− 25.1) minutes nursing time, compared to 215.0 (+/− 71.6) and 99.6 (+/− 29.7) minutes for traditional prenatal care (P < 0.01). This translated into decreased provider cost and increased nursing cost (P < 0.01). Supply costs increased, travel costs declined, and overhead costs declined in the OB Nest model. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, labor cost for OB Nest prenatal care was 34% higher than for traditional prenatal care. The increased cost is largely attributable to additional nursing connected care time, and in some practice settings may be offset by decreased overhead costs and increased provider billing opportunities. Future efforts will be focused on development of digital solutions for some routine nursing tasks to decrease the overall cost of the model. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02082275.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7818056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78180562021-01-21 OB Nest randomized controlled trial: a cost comparison of reduced visit compared to traditional prenatal care Theiler, Regan N. Butler-Tobah, Yvonne Hathcock, Matthew A. Famuyide, Abimbola BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Traditional prenatal care includes up to 13 in person office visits, and the cost of this care is not well-described. Alternative models are being explored to better meet the needs of patients and providers. OB Nest is a telemedicine-enhanced program with a reduced frequency of in-person prenatal visits. The cost implications of connected care services added to prenatal care packages are unclear. METHODS: Using data from the OB Nest randomized, controlled trial we analyzed the provider and staff time associated with prenatal care in the traditional and OB Nest models. Fewer visits were required for OB Nest, but given the compensatory increase in connected care activity and supplies, the actual cost difference is not known. Nursing and provider staff time was prospectively recorded for all patients enrolled in the OB Nest clinical trial. Published 2015 national wages for healthcare workers were used to calculate the actual labor cost of providing either traditional or OB Nest prenatal care in 2015 US dollars. Overhead expenses and opportunity costs were not considered. RESULTS: Total provider cost was decreased caring for the OB Nest participants, but nursing cost was increased. OB Nest care required an average of 160.8 (+/− 45.0) minutes provider time and 237 (+/− 25.1) minutes nursing time, compared to 215.0 (+/− 71.6) and 99.6 (+/− 29.7) minutes for traditional prenatal care (P < 0.01). This translated into decreased provider cost and increased nursing cost (P < 0.01). Supply costs increased, travel costs declined, and overhead costs declined in the OB Nest model. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, labor cost for OB Nest prenatal care was 34% higher than for traditional prenatal care. The increased cost is largely attributable to additional nursing connected care time, and in some practice settings may be offset by decreased overhead costs and increased provider billing opportunities. Future efforts will be focused on development of digital solutions for some routine nursing tasks to decrease the overall cost of the model. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02082275. BioMed Central 2021-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7818056/ /pubmed/33478433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03557-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Theiler, Regan N.
Butler-Tobah, Yvonne
Hathcock, Matthew A.
Famuyide, Abimbola
OB Nest randomized controlled trial: a cost comparison of reduced visit compared to traditional prenatal care
title OB Nest randomized controlled trial: a cost comparison of reduced visit compared to traditional prenatal care
title_full OB Nest randomized controlled trial: a cost comparison of reduced visit compared to traditional prenatal care
title_fullStr OB Nest randomized controlled trial: a cost comparison of reduced visit compared to traditional prenatal care
title_full_unstemmed OB Nest randomized controlled trial: a cost comparison of reduced visit compared to traditional prenatal care
title_short OB Nest randomized controlled trial: a cost comparison of reduced visit compared to traditional prenatal care
title_sort ob nest randomized controlled trial: a cost comparison of reduced visit compared to traditional prenatal care
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7818056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33478433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03557-3
work_keys_str_mv AT theilerregann obnestrandomizedcontrolledtrialacostcomparisonofreducedvisitcomparedtotraditionalprenatalcare
AT butlertobahyvonne obnestrandomizedcontrolledtrialacostcomparisonofreducedvisitcomparedtotraditionalprenatalcare
AT hathcockmatthewa obnestrandomizedcontrolledtrialacostcomparisonofreducedvisitcomparedtotraditionalprenatalcare
AT famuyideabimbola obnestrandomizedcontrolledtrialacostcomparisonofreducedvisitcomparedtotraditionalprenatalcare