Cargando…
Patient‐specific finite element models of the human mandible: Lack of consensus on current set‐ups
The use of finite element analysis (FEA) has increased rapidly over the last decennia and has become a popular tool to design implants, osteosynthesis plates and prostheses. With increasing computer capacity and the availability of software applications, it has become easier to employ the FEA. Howev...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7818111/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32372548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/odi.13381 |
_version_ | 1783638767457796096 |
---|---|
author | Merema, Bram Barteld Jan Kraeima, Joep Glas, Haye H. Spijkervet, Fred K. L. Witjes, Max J. H. |
author_facet | Merema, Bram Barteld Jan Kraeima, Joep Glas, Haye H. Spijkervet, Fred K. L. Witjes, Max J. H. |
author_sort | Merema, Bram Barteld Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | The use of finite element analysis (FEA) has increased rapidly over the last decennia and has become a popular tool to design implants, osteosynthesis plates and prostheses. With increasing computer capacity and the availability of software applications, it has become easier to employ the FEA. However, there seems to be no consensus on the input variables that should be applied to representative FEA models of the human mandible. This review aims to find a consensus on how to define the representative input factors for a FEA model of the human mandible. A literature search carried out in the PubMed and Embase database resulted in 137 matches. Seven papers were included in this current study. Within the search results, only a few FEA models had been validated. The material properties and FEA approaches varied considerably, and the available validations are not strong enough for a general consensus. Further validations are required, preferably using the same measuring workflow to obtain insight into the broad array of mandibular variations. A lot of work is still required to establish validated FEA settings and to prevent assumptions when it comes to FEA applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7818111 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78181112021-01-29 Patient‐specific finite element models of the human mandible: Lack of consensus on current set‐ups Merema, Bram Barteld Jan Kraeima, Joep Glas, Haye H. Spijkervet, Fred K. L. Witjes, Max J. H. Oral Dis Bone and Hard Tissues The use of finite element analysis (FEA) has increased rapidly over the last decennia and has become a popular tool to design implants, osteosynthesis plates and prostheses. With increasing computer capacity and the availability of software applications, it has become easier to employ the FEA. However, there seems to be no consensus on the input variables that should be applied to representative FEA models of the human mandible. This review aims to find a consensus on how to define the representative input factors for a FEA model of the human mandible. A literature search carried out in the PubMed and Embase database resulted in 137 matches. Seven papers were included in this current study. Within the search results, only a few FEA models had been validated. The material properties and FEA approaches varied considerably, and the available validations are not strong enough for a general consensus. Further validations are required, preferably using the same measuring workflow to obtain insight into the broad array of mandibular variations. A lot of work is still required to establish validated FEA settings and to prevent assumptions when it comes to FEA applications. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-07-09 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7818111/ /pubmed/32372548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/odi.13381 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Oral Diseases published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Bone and Hard Tissues Merema, Bram Barteld Jan Kraeima, Joep Glas, Haye H. Spijkervet, Fred K. L. Witjes, Max J. H. Patient‐specific finite element models of the human mandible: Lack of consensus on current set‐ups |
title | Patient‐specific finite element models of the human mandible: Lack of consensus on current set‐ups |
title_full | Patient‐specific finite element models of the human mandible: Lack of consensus on current set‐ups |
title_fullStr | Patient‐specific finite element models of the human mandible: Lack of consensus on current set‐ups |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient‐specific finite element models of the human mandible: Lack of consensus on current set‐ups |
title_short | Patient‐specific finite element models of the human mandible: Lack of consensus on current set‐ups |
title_sort | patient‐specific finite element models of the human mandible: lack of consensus on current set‐ups |
topic | Bone and Hard Tissues |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7818111/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32372548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/odi.13381 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meremabrambarteldjan patientspecificfiniteelementmodelsofthehumanmandiblelackofconsensusoncurrentsetups AT kraeimajoep patientspecificfiniteelementmodelsofthehumanmandiblelackofconsensusoncurrentsetups AT glashayeh patientspecificfiniteelementmodelsofthehumanmandiblelackofconsensusoncurrentsetups AT spijkervetfredkl patientspecificfiniteelementmodelsofthehumanmandiblelackofconsensusoncurrentsetups AT witjesmaxjh patientspecificfiniteelementmodelsofthehumanmandiblelackofconsensusoncurrentsetups |