Cargando…
Evaluation showed that stakeholders valued the support provided by the Implementing Pediatric Advance Care Planning Toolkit
AIM: This study described the development, and pilot evaluation, of the Implementing Pediatric Advance Care Planning Toolkit (IMPACT). METHODS: Key elements of paediatric advance care planning (ACP) were defined using a systematic review, a survey of 168 paediatricians and qualitative studies of 13...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7818164/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32434275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apa.15370 |
_version_ | 1783638776438849536 |
---|---|
author | Fahner, Jurrianne Rietjens, Judith van der Heide, Agnes Milota, Megan van Delden, Johannes Kars, Marijke |
author_facet | Fahner, Jurrianne Rietjens, Judith van der Heide, Agnes Milota, Megan van Delden, Johannes Kars, Marijke |
author_sort | Fahner, Jurrianne |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: This study described the development, and pilot evaluation, of the Implementing Pediatric Advance Care Planning Toolkit (IMPACT). METHODS: Key elements of paediatric advance care planning (ACP) were defined using a systematic review, a survey of 168 paediatricians and qualitative studies of 13 children with life‐limiting conditions, 20 parents and 18 paediatricians. Participants were purposively recruited from six Dutch university hospitals during September 2016 and November 2018. Key elements were translated into intervention components guided by theory. The acceptability of the content was evaluated by a qualitative pilot study during February and September 2019. This focused on 27 children with life‐limiting conditions from hospitals, a hospice and home care, together with 41 parents, 11 physicians and seven nurses who cared for them. RESULTS: IMPACT provided a holistic, caring approach to ACP, gave children a voice and cared for their parents. It provided information on ACP for families and clinicians, manuals to structure ACP conversations and training for clinicians in communication skills and supportive attitudes. The 53 pilot study participants felt that IMPACT was appropriate for paediatric ACP. CONCLUSION: IMPACT was an appropriate intervention that supported a holistic approach towards paediatric ACP, focused on the child's perspective and provided care for their parents. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7818164 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78181642021-01-29 Evaluation showed that stakeholders valued the support provided by the Implementing Pediatric Advance Care Planning Toolkit Fahner, Jurrianne Rietjens, Judith van der Heide, Agnes Milota, Megan van Delden, Johannes Kars, Marijke Acta Paediatr Regular Articles & Brief Reports AIM: This study described the development, and pilot evaluation, of the Implementing Pediatric Advance Care Planning Toolkit (IMPACT). METHODS: Key elements of paediatric advance care planning (ACP) were defined using a systematic review, a survey of 168 paediatricians and qualitative studies of 13 children with life‐limiting conditions, 20 parents and 18 paediatricians. Participants were purposively recruited from six Dutch university hospitals during September 2016 and November 2018. Key elements were translated into intervention components guided by theory. The acceptability of the content was evaluated by a qualitative pilot study during February and September 2019. This focused on 27 children with life‐limiting conditions from hospitals, a hospice and home care, together with 41 parents, 11 physicians and seven nurses who cared for them. RESULTS: IMPACT provided a holistic, caring approach to ACP, gave children a voice and cared for their parents. It provided information on ACP for families and clinicians, manuals to structure ACP conversations and training for clinicians in communication skills and supportive attitudes. The 53 pilot study participants felt that IMPACT was appropriate for paediatric ACP. CONCLUSION: IMPACT was an appropriate intervention that supported a holistic approach towards paediatric ACP, focused on the child's perspective and provided care for their parents. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-23 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7818164/ /pubmed/32434275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apa.15370 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Acta Paediatrica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Foundation Acta Paediatrica This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Regular Articles & Brief Reports Fahner, Jurrianne Rietjens, Judith van der Heide, Agnes Milota, Megan van Delden, Johannes Kars, Marijke Evaluation showed that stakeholders valued the support provided by the Implementing Pediatric Advance Care Planning Toolkit |
title | Evaluation showed that stakeholders valued the support provided by the Implementing Pediatric Advance Care Planning Toolkit |
title_full | Evaluation showed that stakeholders valued the support provided by the Implementing Pediatric Advance Care Planning Toolkit |
title_fullStr | Evaluation showed that stakeholders valued the support provided by the Implementing Pediatric Advance Care Planning Toolkit |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation showed that stakeholders valued the support provided by the Implementing Pediatric Advance Care Planning Toolkit |
title_short | Evaluation showed that stakeholders valued the support provided by the Implementing Pediatric Advance Care Planning Toolkit |
title_sort | evaluation showed that stakeholders valued the support provided by the implementing pediatric advance care planning toolkit |
topic | Regular Articles & Brief Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7818164/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32434275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apa.15370 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fahnerjurrianne evaluationshowedthatstakeholdersvaluedthesupportprovidedbytheimplementingpediatricadvancecareplanningtoolkit AT rietjensjudith evaluationshowedthatstakeholdersvaluedthesupportprovidedbytheimplementingpediatricadvancecareplanningtoolkit AT vanderheideagnes evaluationshowedthatstakeholdersvaluedthesupportprovidedbytheimplementingpediatricadvancecareplanningtoolkit AT milotamegan evaluationshowedthatstakeholdersvaluedthesupportprovidedbytheimplementingpediatricadvancecareplanningtoolkit AT vandeldenjohannes evaluationshowedthatstakeholdersvaluedthesupportprovidedbytheimplementingpediatricadvancecareplanningtoolkit AT karsmarijke evaluationshowedthatstakeholdersvaluedthesupportprovidedbytheimplementingpediatricadvancecareplanningtoolkit |