Cargando…
Pharmacological management of bipolar disorder: Japanese expert consensus
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop a consensus guideline by certified experts of the Japanese Society of Clinical Neuropsychopharmacology on the psychopharmacological treatment for bipolar disorders I and II (BP‐I and BP‐II), in order to fill the gap in the literature and provide more...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7818260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32558145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bdi.12959 |
_version_ | 1783638798593163264 |
---|---|
author | Sakurai, Hitoshi Kato, Masaki Yasui-Furukori, Norio Suzuki, Takefumi Baba, Hajime Watanabe, Koichiro Inada, Ken Kishida, Ikuko Sugawara Kikuchi, Yuka Kikuchi, Toshiaki Katsuki, Asuka Uchida, Hiroyuki |
author_facet | Sakurai, Hitoshi Kato, Masaki Yasui-Furukori, Norio Suzuki, Takefumi Baba, Hajime Watanabe, Koichiro Inada, Ken Kishida, Ikuko Sugawara Kikuchi, Yuka Kikuchi, Toshiaki Katsuki, Asuka Uchida, Hiroyuki |
author_sort | Sakurai, Hitoshi |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop a consensus guideline by certified experts of the Japanese Society of Clinical Neuropsychopharmacology on the psychopharmacological treatment for bipolar disorders I and II (BP‐I and BP‐II), in order to fill the gap in the literature and provide more concrete guidance for challenging and controversial real‐world situations. METHODS: Experts were asked to assess treatment options regarding 19 clinical situations of bipolar disorder with a nine‐point Likert scale (one = “disagree” and nine = “agree”). According to the responses from 119 experts, the options were categorized into the first‐, second‐, and third‐line treatments. RESULTS: For the treatment of BP‐I, lithium monotherapy was categorized as a first‐line treatment for manic episodes (mean ± standard deviation score, 7.0 ± 2.2), depressive episodes (7.1 ± 2.0), and the maintenance phase (7.8 ± 1.8). Combination therapy of lithium and an atypical antipsychotic was endorsed for manic episodes (7.7 ± 1.7), depressive episodes with (7.1 ± 2.0) and without mixed features (6.9 ± 2.2), and the maintenance phase (6.9 ± 2.1). Similarly, in BP‐II, lithium monotherapy was categorized as a first‐line treatment for hypomanic episodes (7.3 ± 2.2), depressive episodes (7.0 ± 2.2), and the maintenance phase (7.3 ± 2.3), while combination therapy of lithium and an atypical antipsychotic was recommended for hypomanic episodes (6.9 ± 2.4).No antipsychotic monotherapy or antidepressant treatment was categorized as a first‐line treatment for any type of episode. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations reflect the current evidence and represent the experts' consensus on using lithium for the treatment of bipolar disorder. Clinicians should consider the effectiveness and adverse effects of antipsychotic and antidepressant medications for the treatment of bipolar disorder. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7818260 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78182602021-01-29 Pharmacological management of bipolar disorder: Japanese expert consensus Sakurai, Hitoshi Kato, Masaki Yasui-Furukori, Norio Suzuki, Takefumi Baba, Hajime Watanabe, Koichiro Inada, Ken Kishida, Ikuko Sugawara Kikuchi, Yuka Kikuchi, Toshiaki Katsuki, Asuka Uchida, Hiroyuki Bipolar Disord Original Articles OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop a consensus guideline by certified experts of the Japanese Society of Clinical Neuropsychopharmacology on the psychopharmacological treatment for bipolar disorders I and II (BP‐I and BP‐II), in order to fill the gap in the literature and provide more concrete guidance for challenging and controversial real‐world situations. METHODS: Experts were asked to assess treatment options regarding 19 clinical situations of bipolar disorder with a nine‐point Likert scale (one = “disagree” and nine = “agree”). According to the responses from 119 experts, the options were categorized into the first‐, second‐, and third‐line treatments. RESULTS: For the treatment of BP‐I, lithium monotherapy was categorized as a first‐line treatment for manic episodes (mean ± standard deviation score, 7.0 ± 2.2), depressive episodes (7.1 ± 2.0), and the maintenance phase (7.8 ± 1.8). Combination therapy of lithium and an atypical antipsychotic was endorsed for manic episodes (7.7 ± 1.7), depressive episodes with (7.1 ± 2.0) and without mixed features (6.9 ± 2.2), and the maintenance phase (6.9 ± 2.1). Similarly, in BP‐II, lithium monotherapy was categorized as a first‐line treatment for hypomanic episodes (7.3 ± 2.2), depressive episodes (7.0 ± 2.2), and the maintenance phase (7.3 ± 2.3), while combination therapy of lithium and an atypical antipsychotic was recommended for hypomanic episodes (6.9 ± 2.4).No antipsychotic monotherapy or antidepressant treatment was categorized as a first‐line treatment for any type of episode. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations reflect the current evidence and represent the experts' consensus on using lithium for the treatment of bipolar disorder. Clinicians should consider the effectiveness and adverse effects of antipsychotic and antidepressant medications for the treatment of bipolar disorder. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-07-02 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7818260/ /pubmed/32558145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bdi.12959 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Bipolar Disorders published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Sakurai, Hitoshi Kato, Masaki Yasui-Furukori, Norio Suzuki, Takefumi Baba, Hajime Watanabe, Koichiro Inada, Ken Kishida, Ikuko Sugawara Kikuchi, Yuka Kikuchi, Toshiaki Katsuki, Asuka Uchida, Hiroyuki Pharmacological management of bipolar disorder: Japanese expert consensus |
title | Pharmacological management of bipolar disorder: Japanese expert consensus |
title_full | Pharmacological management of bipolar disorder: Japanese expert consensus |
title_fullStr | Pharmacological management of bipolar disorder: Japanese expert consensus |
title_full_unstemmed | Pharmacological management of bipolar disorder: Japanese expert consensus |
title_short | Pharmacological management of bipolar disorder: Japanese expert consensus |
title_sort | pharmacological management of bipolar disorder: japanese expert consensus |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7818260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32558145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bdi.12959 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sakuraihitoshi pharmacologicalmanagementofbipolardisorderjapaneseexpertconsensus AT katomasaki pharmacologicalmanagementofbipolardisorderjapaneseexpertconsensus AT yasuifurukorinorio pharmacologicalmanagementofbipolardisorderjapaneseexpertconsensus AT suzukitakefumi pharmacologicalmanagementofbipolardisorderjapaneseexpertconsensus AT babahajime pharmacologicalmanagementofbipolardisorderjapaneseexpertconsensus AT watanabekoichiro pharmacologicalmanagementofbipolardisorderjapaneseexpertconsensus AT inadaken pharmacologicalmanagementofbipolardisorderjapaneseexpertconsensus AT kishidaikuko pharmacologicalmanagementofbipolardisorderjapaneseexpertconsensus AT sugawarakikuchiyuka pharmacologicalmanagementofbipolardisorderjapaneseexpertconsensus AT kikuchitoshiaki pharmacologicalmanagementofbipolardisorderjapaneseexpertconsensus AT katsukiasuka pharmacologicalmanagementofbipolardisorderjapaneseexpertconsensus AT uchidahiroyuki pharmacologicalmanagementofbipolardisorderjapaneseexpertconsensus AT pharmacologicalmanagementofbipolardisorderjapaneseexpertconsensus |