Cargando…
Effect of data conserving respiratory motion compensation on left ventricular functional parameters assessed in gated myocardial perfusion SPECT
BACKGROUND: Respiratory motion compromises image quality in myocardial perfusion (MP) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging and may affect analysis of left ventricular (LV) functional parameters, including phase analysis-quantified mechanical dyssynchrony parameters. In this pap...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7818343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33475904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-021-00355-w |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Respiratory motion compromises image quality in myocardial perfusion (MP) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging and may affect analysis of left ventricular (LV) functional parameters, including phase analysis-quantified mechanical dyssynchrony parameters. In this paper, we investigate the performance of two algorithms, respiratory blur modeling (RBM) and joint motion-compensated (JMC) ordered-subsets expectation maximization (OSEM), and the effects of motion compensation on cardiac-gated MP-SPECT studies. METHODS: Image acquisitions were carried out with a dual-detector SPECT/CT system in list-mode format. A cardiac phantom was imaged as stationary and under respiratory motion. The images were reconstructed with OSEM, RBM-OSEM, and JMC-OSEM algorithms, and compared in terms of mean squared error (MSE). Subsequently, MP-SPECT data of 19 patients were binned into dual-gated (respiratory and cardiac gating) projection images. The images of the patients were analyzed with Quantitative Gated SPECT (QGS) 2012 program (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, USA). The parameters of interest were LV volumes, ejection fraction, wall motion, wall thickening, phase analysis, and perfusion parameters. RESULTS: In phantom experiment, compared to the stationary OSEM reconstruction, the MSE values for OSEM, RBM-OSEM, and JMC-OSEM were 8.5406·10(−5),2.7190·10(−5), and 2.0795·10(−5), respectively. In the analysis of LV function, use of JMC had a small but statistically significant (p < 0.05) effect on several parameters: it increased LV volumes and standard deviation of phase angle histogram, and it decreased ejection fraction, global wall motion, and lateral, septal, and apical perfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to standard OSEM algorithm, RBM-OSEM and JMC-OSEM both improve image quality under motion. Motion compensation has a minor effect on LV functional parameters. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at (10.1186/s40658-021-00355-w). |
---|