Cargando…
Programming Algorithms for Sacral Neuromodulation: Clinical Practice and Evidence—Recommendations for Day‐to‐Day Practice
BACKGROUND: In sacral neuromodulation (SNM), stimulation programming plays a key role to achieve success of the therapy. However to date, little attention has been given to the best ways to set and optimize SNM programming during the test and chronic stimulation phases of the procedure. OBJECTIVE: S...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7818413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32153080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ner.13117 |
_version_ | 1783638829331120128 |
---|---|
author | Lehur, Paul A. Sørensen, Michael Dudding, Thomas C. Knowles, Charles H. de Wachter, Stefan Engelberg, Stefan Matzel, Klaus E. |
author_facet | Lehur, Paul A. Sørensen, Michael Dudding, Thomas C. Knowles, Charles H. de Wachter, Stefan Engelberg, Stefan Matzel, Klaus E. |
author_sort | Lehur, Paul A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In sacral neuromodulation (SNM), stimulation programming plays a key role to achieve success of the therapy. However to date, little attention has been given to the best ways to set and optimize SNM programming during the test and chronic stimulation phases of the procedure. OBJECTIVE: Standardize and make SNM programming easier and more efficient for the several conditions for which SNM is proposed. METHODS: Systematic literature review and collective clinical experience report. RESULTS: The basic principles of SNM programming are described. It covers choice of electrode configuration, stimulation amplitude, pulse frequency and pulse widths, while use of cycling is also briefly discussed. Step‐by‐step practical flow charts developed by a group of 13 European experts are presented. CONCLUSIONS: Programming of SNM therapy is not complex. There are few programming settings that seem beneficial or significantly impact patient outcomes. Only four basic electrode configurations could be identified according to four different options to define the cathode. In a majority of patients, the proposed stimulation parameters will allow a satisfactory improvement for long periods of time. A regular follow‐up is, however, necessary to assess and eventually optimize results, as well as to reassure patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7818413 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78184132021-01-29 Programming Algorithms for Sacral Neuromodulation: Clinical Practice and Evidence—Recommendations for Day‐to‐Day Practice Lehur, Paul A. Sørensen, Michael Dudding, Thomas C. Knowles, Charles H. de Wachter, Stefan Engelberg, Stefan Matzel, Klaus E. Neuromodulation Review Articles BACKGROUND: In sacral neuromodulation (SNM), stimulation programming plays a key role to achieve success of the therapy. However to date, little attention has been given to the best ways to set and optimize SNM programming during the test and chronic stimulation phases of the procedure. OBJECTIVE: Standardize and make SNM programming easier and more efficient for the several conditions for which SNM is proposed. METHODS: Systematic literature review and collective clinical experience report. RESULTS: The basic principles of SNM programming are described. It covers choice of electrode configuration, stimulation amplitude, pulse frequency and pulse widths, while use of cycling is also briefly discussed. Step‐by‐step practical flow charts developed by a group of 13 European experts are presented. CONCLUSIONS: Programming of SNM therapy is not complex. There are few programming settings that seem beneficial or significantly impact patient outcomes. Only four basic electrode configurations could be identified according to four different options to define the cathode. In a majority of patients, the proposed stimulation parameters will allow a satisfactory improvement for long periods of time. A regular follow‐up is, however, necessary to assess and eventually optimize results, as well as to reassure patients. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-03-09 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7818413/ /pubmed/32153080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ner.13117 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Neuromodulation Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Lehur, Paul A. Sørensen, Michael Dudding, Thomas C. Knowles, Charles H. de Wachter, Stefan Engelberg, Stefan Matzel, Klaus E. Programming Algorithms for Sacral Neuromodulation: Clinical Practice and Evidence—Recommendations for Day‐to‐Day Practice |
title | Programming Algorithms for Sacral Neuromodulation: Clinical Practice and Evidence—Recommendations for Day‐to‐Day Practice |
title_full | Programming Algorithms for Sacral Neuromodulation: Clinical Practice and Evidence—Recommendations for Day‐to‐Day Practice |
title_fullStr | Programming Algorithms for Sacral Neuromodulation: Clinical Practice and Evidence—Recommendations for Day‐to‐Day Practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Programming Algorithms for Sacral Neuromodulation: Clinical Practice and Evidence—Recommendations for Day‐to‐Day Practice |
title_short | Programming Algorithms for Sacral Neuromodulation: Clinical Practice and Evidence—Recommendations for Day‐to‐Day Practice |
title_sort | programming algorithms for sacral neuromodulation: clinical practice and evidence—recommendations for day‐to‐day practice |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7818413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32153080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ner.13117 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lehurpaula programmingalgorithmsforsacralneuromodulationclinicalpracticeandevidencerecommendationsfordaytodaypractice AT sørensenmichael programmingalgorithmsforsacralneuromodulationclinicalpracticeandevidencerecommendationsfordaytodaypractice AT duddingthomasc programmingalgorithmsforsacralneuromodulationclinicalpracticeandevidencerecommendationsfordaytodaypractice AT knowlescharlesh programmingalgorithmsforsacralneuromodulationclinicalpracticeandevidencerecommendationsfordaytodaypractice AT dewachterstefan programmingalgorithmsforsacralneuromodulationclinicalpracticeandevidencerecommendationsfordaytodaypractice AT engelbergstefan programmingalgorithmsforsacralneuromodulationclinicalpracticeandevidencerecommendationsfordaytodaypractice AT matzelklause programmingalgorithmsforsacralneuromodulationclinicalpracticeandevidencerecommendationsfordaytodaypractice AT programmingalgorithmsforsacralneuromodulationclinicalpracticeandevidencerecommendationsfordaytodaypractice |