Cargando…

Programming Algorithms for Sacral Neuromodulation: Clinical Practice and Evidence—Recommendations for Day‐to‐Day Practice

BACKGROUND: In sacral neuromodulation (SNM), stimulation programming plays a key role to achieve success of the therapy. However to date, little attention has been given to the best ways to set and optimize SNM programming during the test and chronic stimulation phases of the procedure. OBJECTIVE: S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lehur, Paul A., Sørensen, Michael, Dudding, Thomas C., Knowles, Charles H., de Wachter, Stefan, Engelberg, Stefan, Matzel, Klaus E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7818413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32153080
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ner.13117
_version_ 1783638829331120128
author Lehur, Paul A.
Sørensen, Michael
Dudding, Thomas C.
Knowles, Charles H.
de Wachter, Stefan
Engelberg, Stefan
Matzel, Klaus E.
author_facet Lehur, Paul A.
Sørensen, Michael
Dudding, Thomas C.
Knowles, Charles H.
de Wachter, Stefan
Engelberg, Stefan
Matzel, Klaus E.
author_sort Lehur, Paul A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In sacral neuromodulation (SNM), stimulation programming plays a key role to achieve success of the therapy. However to date, little attention has been given to the best ways to set and optimize SNM programming during the test and chronic stimulation phases of the procedure. OBJECTIVE: Standardize and make SNM programming easier and more efficient for the several conditions for which SNM is proposed. METHODS: Systematic literature review and collective clinical experience report. RESULTS: The basic principles of SNM programming are described. It covers choice of electrode configuration, stimulation amplitude, pulse frequency and pulse widths, while use of cycling is also briefly discussed. Step‐by‐step practical flow charts developed by a group of 13 European experts are presented. CONCLUSIONS: Programming of SNM therapy is not complex. There are few programming settings that seem beneficial or significantly impact patient outcomes. Only four basic electrode configurations could be identified according to four different options to define the cathode. In a majority of patients, the proposed stimulation parameters will allow a satisfactory improvement for long periods of time. A regular follow‐up is, however, necessary to assess and eventually optimize results, as well as to reassure patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7818413
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78184132021-01-29 Programming Algorithms for Sacral Neuromodulation: Clinical Practice and Evidence—Recommendations for Day‐to‐Day Practice Lehur, Paul A. Sørensen, Michael Dudding, Thomas C. Knowles, Charles H. de Wachter, Stefan Engelberg, Stefan Matzel, Klaus E. Neuromodulation Review Articles BACKGROUND: In sacral neuromodulation (SNM), stimulation programming plays a key role to achieve success of the therapy. However to date, little attention has been given to the best ways to set and optimize SNM programming during the test and chronic stimulation phases of the procedure. OBJECTIVE: Standardize and make SNM programming easier and more efficient for the several conditions for which SNM is proposed. METHODS: Systematic literature review and collective clinical experience report. RESULTS: The basic principles of SNM programming are described. It covers choice of electrode configuration, stimulation amplitude, pulse frequency and pulse widths, while use of cycling is also briefly discussed. Step‐by‐step practical flow charts developed by a group of 13 European experts are presented. CONCLUSIONS: Programming of SNM therapy is not complex. There are few programming settings that seem beneficial or significantly impact patient outcomes. Only four basic electrode configurations could be identified according to four different options to define the cathode. In a majority of patients, the proposed stimulation parameters will allow a satisfactory improvement for long periods of time. A regular follow‐up is, however, necessary to assess and eventually optimize results, as well as to reassure patients. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-03-09 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7818413/ /pubmed/32153080 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ner.13117 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Neuromodulation Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Lehur, Paul A.
Sørensen, Michael
Dudding, Thomas C.
Knowles, Charles H.
de Wachter, Stefan
Engelberg, Stefan
Matzel, Klaus E.
Programming Algorithms for Sacral Neuromodulation: Clinical Practice and Evidence—Recommendations for Day‐to‐Day Practice
title Programming Algorithms for Sacral Neuromodulation: Clinical Practice and Evidence—Recommendations for Day‐to‐Day Practice
title_full Programming Algorithms for Sacral Neuromodulation: Clinical Practice and Evidence—Recommendations for Day‐to‐Day Practice
title_fullStr Programming Algorithms for Sacral Neuromodulation: Clinical Practice and Evidence—Recommendations for Day‐to‐Day Practice
title_full_unstemmed Programming Algorithms for Sacral Neuromodulation: Clinical Practice and Evidence—Recommendations for Day‐to‐Day Practice
title_short Programming Algorithms for Sacral Neuromodulation: Clinical Practice and Evidence—Recommendations for Day‐to‐Day Practice
title_sort programming algorithms for sacral neuromodulation: clinical practice and evidence—recommendations for day‐to‐day practice
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7818413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32153080
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ner.13117
work_keys_str_mv AT lehurpaula programmingalgorithmsforsacralneuromodulationclinicalpracticeandevidencerecommendationsfordaytodaypractice
AT sørensenmichael programmingalgorithmsforsacralneuromodulationclinicalpracticeandevidencerecommendationsfordaytodaypractice
AT duddingthomasc programmingalgorithmsforsacralneuromodulationclinicalpracticeandevidencerecommendationsfordaytodaypractice
AT knowlescharlesh programmingalgorithmsforsacralneuromodulationclinicalpracticeandevidencerecommendationsfordaytodaypractice
AT dewachterstefan programmingalgorithmsforsacralneuromodulationclinicalpracticeandevidencerecommendationsfordaytodaypractice
AT engelbergstefan programmingalgorithmsforsacralneuromodulationclinicalpracticeandevidencerecommendationsfordaytodaypractice
AT matzelklause programmingalgorithmsforsacralneuromodulationclinicalpracticeandevidencerecommendationsfordaytodaypractice
AT programmingalgorithmsforsacralneuromodulationclinicalpracticeandevidencerecommendationsfordaytodaypractice