Cargando…

Cerebroplacental ratio in predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a meta‐analysis of individual participant data

OBJECTIVE: To investigate if cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) adds to the predictive value of umbilical artery pulsatility index (UA PI) alone – standard of practice – for adverse perinatal outcome in singleton pregnancies. DESIGN AND SETTING: Meta‐analysis based on individual participant data (IPD). PO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vollgraff Heidweiller‐Schreurs, CA, van Osch, IR, Heymans, MW, Ganzevoort, W, Schoonmade, LJ, Bax, CJ, Mol, BWJ, de Groot, CJM, Bossuyt, PMM, de Boer, MA
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7818434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32363701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16287
_version_ 1783638834206998528
author Vollgraff Heidweiller‐Schreurs, CA
van Osch, IR
Heymans, MW
Ganzevoort, W
Schoonmade, LJ
Bax, CJ
Mol, BWJ
de Groot, CJM
Bossuyt, PMM
de Boer, MA
author_facet Vollgraff Heidweiller‐Schreurs, CA
van Osch, IR
Heymans, MW
Ganzevoort, W
Schoonmade, LJ
Bax, CJ
Mol, BWJ
de Groot, CJM
Bossuyt, PMM
de Boer, MA
author_sort Vollgraff Heidweiller‐Schreurs, CA
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate if cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) adds to the predictive value of umbilical artery pulsatility index (UA PI) alone – standard of practice – for adverse perinatal outcome in singleton pregnancies. DESIGN AND SETTING: Meta‐analysis based on individual participant data (IPD). POPULATION OR SAMPLE: Ten centres provided 17 data sets for 21 661 participants, 18 731 of which could be included. Sample sizes per data set ranged from 207 to 9215 individuals. Patient populations varied from uncomplicated to complicated pregnancies. METHODS: In a collaborative, pooled analysis, we compared the prognostic value of combining CPR with UA PI, versus UA PI only and CPR only, with a one‐stage IPD approach. After multiple imputation of missing values, we used multilevel multivariable logistic regression to develop prediction models. We evaluated the classification performance of all models with receiver operating characteristics analysis. We performed subgroup analyses according to gestational age, birthweight centile and estimated fetal weight centile. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Composite adverse perinatal outcome, defined as perinatal death, caesarean section for fetal distress or neonatal unit admission. RESULTS: Adverse outcomes occurred in 3423 (18%) participants. The model with UA PI alone resulted in an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.775 (95% CI 0.709–0.828) and with CPR alone in an AUC of 0.778 (95% CI 0.715–0.831). Addition of CPR to the UA PI model resulted in an increase in the AUC of 0.003 points (0.778, 95% CI 0.714–0.831). These results were consistent across all subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Cerebroplacental ratio added no predictive value for adverse perinatal outcome beyond UA PI, when assessing singleton pregnancies, irrespective of gestational age or fetal size. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Doppler measurement of cerebroplacental ratio in clinical practice has limited added predictive value to umbilical artery alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7818434
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78184342021-01-29 Cerebroplacental ratio in predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a meta‐analysis of individual participant data Vollgraff Heidweiller‐Schreurs, CA van Osch, IR Heymans, MW Ganzevoort, W Schoonmade, LJ Bax, CJ Mol, BWJ de Groot, CJM Bossuyt, PMM de Boer, MA BJOG Original Article OBJECTIVE: To investigate if cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) adds to the predictive value of umbilical artery pulsatility index (UA PI) alone – standard of practice – for adverse perinatal outcome in singleton pregnancies. DESIGN AND SETTING: Meta‐analysis based on individual participant data (IPD). POPULATION OR SAMPLE: Ten centres provided 17 data sets for 21 661 participants, 18 731 of which could be included. Sample sizes per data set ranged from 207 to 9215 individuals. Patient populations varied from uncomplicated to complicated pregnancies. METHODS: In a collaborative, pooled analysis, we compared the prognostic value of combining CPR with UA PI, versus UA PI only and CPR only, with a one‐stage IPD approach. After multiple imputation of missing values, we used multilevel multivariable logistic regression to develop prediction models. We evaluated the classification performance of all models with receiver operating characteristics analysis. We performed subgroup analyses according to gestational age, birthweight centile and estimated fetal weight centile. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Composite adverse perinatal outcome, defined as perinatal death, caesarean section for fetal distress or neonatal unit admission. RESULTS: Adverse outcomes occurred in 3423 (18%) participants. The model with UA PI alone resulted in an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.775 (95% CI 0.709–0.828) and with CPR alone in an AUC of 0.778 (95% CI 0.715–0.831). Addition of CPR to the UA PI model resulted in an increase in the AUC of 0.003 points (0.778, 95% CI 0.714–0.831). These results were consistent across all subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Cerebroplacental ratio added no predictive value for adverse perinatal outcome beyond UA PI, when assessing singleton pregnancies, irrespective of gestational age or fetal size. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Doppler measurement of cerebroplacental ratio in clinical practice has limited added predictive value to umbilical artery alone. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-08 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7818434/ /pubmed/32363701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16287 Text en © 2020 The Authors. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Vollgraff Heidweiller‐Schreurs, CA
van Osch, IR
Heymans, MW
Ganzevoort, W
Schoonmade, LJ
Bax, CJ
Mol, BWJ
de Groot, CJM
Bossuyt, PMM
de Boer, MA
Cerebroplacental ratio in predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a meta‐analysis of individual participant data
title Cerebroplacental ratio in predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a meta‐analysis of individual participant data
title_full Cerebroplacental ratio in predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a meta‐analysis of individual participant data
title_fullStr Cerebroplacental ratio in predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a meta‐analysis of individual participant data
title_full_unstemmed Cerebroplacental ratio in predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a meta‐analysis of individual participant data
title_short Cerebroplacental ratio in predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a meta‐analysis of individual participant data
title_sort cerebroplacental ratio in predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a meta‐analysis of individual participant data
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7818434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32363701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16287
work_keys_str_mv AT vollgraffheidweillerschreursca cerebroplacentalratioinpredictingadverseperinataloutcomeametaanalysisofindividualparticipantdata
AT vanoschir cerebroplacentalratioinpredictingadverseperinataloutcomeametaanalysisofindividualparticipantdata
AT heymansmw cerebroplacentalratioinpredictingadverseperinataloutcomeametaanalysisofindividualparticipantdata
AT ganzevoortw cerebroplacentalratioinpredictingadverseperinataloutcomeametaanalysisofindividualparticipantdata
AT schoonmadelj cerebroplacentalratioinpredictingadverseperinataloutcomeametaanalysisofindividualparticipantdata
AT baxcj cerebroplacentalratioinpredictingadverseperinataloutcomeametaanalysisofindividualparticipantdata
AT molbwj cerebroplacentalratioinpredictingadverseperinataloutcomeametaanalysisofindividualparticipantdata
AT degrootcjm cerebroplacentalratioinpredictingadverseperinataloutcomeametaanalysisofindividualparticipantdata
AT bossuytpmm cerebroplacentalratioinpredictingadverseperinataloutcomeametaanalysisofindividualparticipantdata
AT deboerma cerebroplacentalratioinpredictingadverseperinataloutcomeametaanalysisofindividualparticipantdata
AT cerebroplacentalratioinpredictingadverseperinataloutcomeametaanalysisofindividualparticipantdata