Cargando…
Validation of a Patient Global Assessment for extent, severity and impact to define the severity strata for the Self Assessment Vitiligo Extent Score (SA‐VES)
BACKGROUND: The Self Assessment Vitiligo Extent Score (SA‐VES) is a validated, patient‐reported outcome measure to assess the body surface area affected with vitiligo. Information on how to translate the obtained score into extent, severity and impact strata (mild–moderate–severe) is still lacking....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7818448/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32452565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.16562 |
_version_ | 1783638837542518784 |
---|---|
author | van Geel, N. Uitentuis, S.E. Zuidgeest, M. Wolkerstorfer, A. Bekkenk, M.W. Moock, C. Van Goethem, C. Verlaeckt, E. Smet, C. Grine, L. Speeckaert, R. |
author_facet | van Geel, N. Uitentuis, S.E. Zuidgeest, M. Wolkerstorfer, A. Bekkenk, M.W. Moock, C. Van Goethem, C. Verlaeckt, E. Smet, C. Grine, L. Speeckaert, R. |
author_sort | van Geel, N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Self Assessment Vitiligo Extent Score (SA‐VES) is a validated, patient‐reported outcome measure to assess the body surface area affected with vitiligo. Information on how to translate the obtained score into extent, severity and impact strata (mild–moderate–severe) is still lacking. Stratification is helpful to define inclusion criteria for trials, enables comparison and pooling of trial results and can be used for epidemiological research. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to develop extent, severity and impact strata for the SA‐VES based on validated anchor‐based questions. METHODS: In total, 315 patients with vitiligo (non‐segmental; age ≥ 16) recruited at the Ghent University Hospital (Belgium) completed a questionnaire that was conducted in cooperation with the Dutch Society for vitiligo patients to ensure content validity. First three anchor questions included in the questionnaire [Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) for vitiligo extent, severity and impact] were assessed for content validity, construct validity and intrarater reliability. Subsequently, the PtGAs were used to stratify the SA‐VES based on ROC analysis. RESULTS: For all PtGAs (PtGA extent, PtGA severity, PtGA impact), at least 75% of hypotheses evaluated for construct validity were confirmed. Intrarater reliability of all PtGAs was good to excellent (ICCs PtGA extent: 0.623; PtGA severity: 0.828; PtGA impact: 0.851). The optimal cut‐off values of the SA‐VES between the three global categories (mild/limited – moderate – severe/extensive) were 1.05% and 6.45% based on PtGA extent, 2.07% and 4.8% based on PtGA severity and 2% and 3.35% based on PtGA impact. CONCLUSION: This study provides the first guide for the interpretation of the numerical output obtained by the SA‐VES (vitiligo extent) and enables the translation into a global vitiligo grading for extent, severity and impact. As patients’ interpretation of vitiligo extent, severity and impact may vary amongst patients worldwide, future international studies will be required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7818448 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78184482021-01-29 Validation of a Patient Global Assessment for extent, severity and impact to define the severity strata for the Self Assessment Vitiligo Extent Score (SA‐VES) van Geel, N. Uitentuis, S.E. Zuidgeest, M. Wolkerstorfer, A. Bekkenk, M.W. Moock, C. Van Goethem, C. Verlaeckt, E. Smet, C. Grine, L. Speeckaert, R. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Pigmentary Dermatoses BACKGROUND: The Self Assessment Vitiligo Extent Score (SA‐VES) is a validated, patient‐reported outcome measure to assess the body surface area affected with vitiligo. Information on how to translate the obtained score into extent, severity and impact strata (mild–moderate–severe) is still lacking. Stratification is helpful to define inclusion criteria for trials, enables comparison and pooling of trial results and can be used for epidemiological research. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to develop extent, severity and impact strata for the SA‐VES based on validated anchor‐based questions. METHODS: In total, 315 patients with vitiligo (non‐segmental; age ≥ 16) recruited at the Ghent University Hospital (Belgium) completed a questionnaire that was conducted in cooperation with the Dutch Society for vitiligo patients to ensure content validity. First three anchor questions included in the questionnaire [Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) for vitiligo extent, severity and impact] were assessed for content validity, construct validity and intrarater reliability. Subsequently, the PtGAs were used to stratify the SA‐VES based on ROC analysis. RESULTS: For all PtGAs (PtGA extent, PtGA severity, PtGA impact), at least 75% of hypotheses evaluated for construct validity were confirmed. Intrarater reliability of all PtGAs was good to excellent (ICCs PtGA extent: 0.623; PtGA severity: 0.828; PtGA impact: 0.851). The optimal cut‐off values of the SA‐VES between the three global categories (mild/limited – moderate – severe/extensive) were 1.05% and 6.45% based on PtGA extent, 2.07% and 4.8% based on PtGA severity and 2% and 3.35% based on PtGA impact. CONCLUSION: This study provides the first guide for the interpretation of the numerical output obtained by the SA‐VES (vitiligo extent) and enables the translation into a global vitiligo grading for extent, severity and impact. As patients’ interpretation of vitiligo extent, severity and impact may vary amongst patients worldwide, future international studies will be required. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-09-01 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7818448/ /pubmed/32452565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.16562 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Pigmentary Dermatoses van Geel, N. Uitentuis, S.E. Zuidgeest, M. Wolkerstorfer, A. Bekkenk, M.W. Moock, C. Van Goethem, C. Verlaeckt, E. Smet, C. Grine, L. Speeckaert, R. Validation of a Patient Global Assessment for extent, severity and impact to define the severity strata for the Self Assessment Vitiligo Extent Score (SA‐VES) |
title | Validation of a Patient Global Assessment for extent, severity and impact to define the severity strata for the Self Assessment Vitiligo Extent Score (SA‐VES) |
title_full | Validation of a Patient Global Assessment for extent, severity and impact to define the severity strata for the Self Assessment Vitiligo Extent Score (SA‐VES) |
title_fullStr | Validation of a Patient Global Assessment for extent, severity and impact to define the severity strata for the Self Assessment Vitiligo Extent Score (SA‐VES) |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of a Patient Global Assessment for extent, severity and impact to define the severity strata for the Self Assessment Vitiligo Extent Score (SA‐VES) |
title_short | Validation of a Patient Global Assessment for extent, severity and impact to define the severity strata for the Self Assessment Vitiligo Extent Score (SA‐VES) |
title_sort | validation of a patient global assessment for extent, severity and impact to define the severity strata for the self assessment vitiligo extent score (sa‐ves) |
topic | Pigmentary Dermatoses |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7818448/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32452565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.16562 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vangeeln validationofapatientglobalassessmentforextentseverityandimpacttodefinetheseveritystratafortheselfassessmentvitiligoextentscoresaves AT uitentuisse validationofapatientglobalassessmentforextentseverityandimpacttodefinetheseveritystratafortheselfassessmentvitiligoextentscoresaves AT zuidgeestm validationofapatientglobalassessmentforextentseverityandimpacttodefinetheseveritystratafortheselfassessmentvitiligoextentscoresaves AT wolkerstorfera validationofapatientglobalassessmentforextentseverityandimpacttodefinetheseveritystratafortheselfassessmentvitiligoextentscoresaves AT bekkenkmw validationofapatientglobalassessmentforextentseverityandimpacttodefinetheseveritystratafortheselfassessmentvitiligoextentscoresaves AT moockc validationofapatientglobalassessmentforextentseverityandimpacttodefinetheseveritystratafortheselfassessmentvitiligoextentscoresaves AT vangoethemc validationofapatientglobalassessmentforextentseverityandimpacttodefinetheseveritystratafortheselfassessmentvitiligoextentscoresaves AT verlaeckte validationofapatientglobalassessmentforextentseverityandimpacttodefinetheseveritystratafortheselfassessmentvitiligoextentscoresaves AT smetc validationofapatientglobalassessmentforextentseverityandimpacttodefinetheseveritystratafortheselfassessmentvitiligoextentscoresaves AT grinel validationofapatientglobalassessmentforextentseverityandimpacttodefinetheseveritystratafortheselfassessmentvitiligoextentscoresaves AT speeckaertr validationofapatientglobalassessmentforextentseverityandimpacttodefinetheseveritystratafortheselfassessmentvitiligoextentscoresaves |