Cargando…
What is the optimal timing for implant placement in oral cancer patients? A scoping literature review
BACKGROUND: Oral cancer patients can benefit from dental implant placement. Traditionally, implants are placed after completing oncologic treatment (secondary implant placement). Implant placement during ablative surgery (primary placement) in oral cancer patients seems beneficial in terms of early...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7818452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32097511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/odi.13312 |
_version_ | 1783638838033252352 |
---|---|
author | Alberga, Jamie M. Vosselman, Nathalie Korfage, Anke Delli, Konstantina Witjes, Max J. H. Raghoebar, Gerry M. Vissink, Arjan |
author_facet | Alberga, Jamie M. Vosselman, Nathalie Korfage, Anke Delli, Konstantina Witjes, Max J. H. Raghoebar, Gerry M. Vissink, Arjan |
author_sort | Alberga, Jamie M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Oral cancer patients can benefit from dental implant placement. Traditionally, implants are placed after completing oncologic treatment (secondary implant placement). Implant placement during ablative surgery (primary placement) in oral cancer patients seems beneficial in terms of early start of oral rehabilitation and limiting additional surgical interventions. Guidelines on the ideal timing of implant placement in oral cancer patients are missing. OBJECTIVE: To perform a scoping literature review on studies examining the timing of dental implant placement in oral cancer patients and propose a clinical practice recommendations guideline. METHODS: A literature search for studies dealing with primary and/or secondary implant placement in MEDLINE was conducted (last search December 27, 2019). The primary outcome was 5‐year implant survival. RESULTS: Sixteen out of 808 studies were considered eligible. Both primary and secondary implant placement showed acceptable overall implant survival ratios with a higher pooled 5‐year implant survival rate for primary implant placement 92.8% (95% CI: 87.1%–98.5%) than secondary placed implants (86.4%, 95% CI: 77.0%–95.8%). Primary implant placement is accompanied by earlier prosthetic rehabilitation after tumor surgery. CONCLUSION: Patients with oral cancer greatly benefit from, preferably primary placed, dental implants in their prosthetic rehabilitation. The combination of tumor surgery with implant placement in native mandibular bone should be provided as standard care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7818452 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78184522021-01-29 What is the optimal timing for implant placement in oral cancer patients? A scoping literature review Alberga, Jamie M. Vosselman, Nathalie Korfage, Anke Delli, Konstantina Witjes, Max J. H. Raghoebar, Gerry M. Vissink, Arjan Oral Dis Cancer and Potentially Malignant Disorders BACKGROUND: Oral cancer patients can benefit from dental implant placement. Traditionally, implants are placed after completing oncologic treatment (secondary implant placement). Implant placement during ablative surgery (primary placement) in oral cancer patients seems beneficial in terms of early start of oral rehabilitation and limiting additional surgical interventions. Guidelines on the ideal timing of implant placement in oral cancer patients are missing. OBJECTIVE: To perform a scoping literature review on studies examining the timing of dental implant placement in oral cancer patients and propose a clinical practice recommendations guideline. METHODS: A literature search for studies dealing with primary and/or secondary implant placement in MEDLINE was conducted (last search December 27, 2019). The primary outcome was 5‐year implant survival. RESULTS: Sixteen out of 808 studies were considered eligible. Both primary and secondary implant placement showed acceptable overall implant survival ratios with a higher pooled 5‐year implant survival rate for primary implant placement 92.8% (95% CI: 87.1%–98.5%) than secondary placed implants (86.4%, 95% CI: 77.0%–95.8%). Primary implant placement is accompanied by earlier prosthetic rehabilitation after tumor surgery. CONCLUSION: Patients with oral cancer greatly benefit from, preferably primary placed, dental implants in their prosthetic rehabilitation. The combination of tumor surgery with implant placement in native mandibular bone should be provided as standard care. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-03-19 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7818452/ /pubmed/32097511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/odi.13312 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Oral Diseases published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Cancer and Potentially Malignant Disorders Alberga, Jamie M. Vosselman, Nathalie Korfage, Anke Delli, Konstantina Witjes, Max J. H. Raghoebar, Gerry M. Vissink, Arjan What is the optimal timing for implant placement in oral cancer patients? A scoping literature review |
title | What is the optimal timing for implant placement in oral cancer patients? A scoping literature review |
title_full | What is the optimal timing for implant placement in oral cancer patients? A scoping literature review |
title_fullStr | What is the optimal timing for implant placement in oral cancer patients? A scoping literature review |
title_full_unstemmed | What is the optimal timing for implant placement in oral cancer patients? A scoping literature review |
title_short | What is the optimal timing for implant placement in oral cancer patients? A scoping literature review |
title_sort | what is the optimal timing for implant placement in oral cancer patients? a scoping literature review |
topic | Cancer and Potentially Malignant Disorders |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7818452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32097511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/odi.13312 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT albergajamiem whatistheoptimaltimingforimplantplacementinoralcancerpatientsascopingliteraturereview AT vosselmannathalie whatistheoptimaltimingforimplantplacementinoralcancerpatientsascopingliteraturereview AT korfageanke whatistheoptimaltimingforimplantplacementinoralcancerpatientsascopingliteraturereview AT dellikonstantina whatistheoptimaltimingforimplantplacementinoralcancerpatientsascopingliteraturereview AT witjesmaxjh whatistheoptimaltimingforimplantplacementinoralcancerpatientsascopingliteraturereview AT raghoebargerrym whatistheoptimaltimingforimplantplacementinoralcancerpatientsascopingliteraturereview AT vissinkarjan whatistheoptimaltimingforimplantplacementinoralcancerpatientsascopingliteraturereview |