Cargando…

Commodity risk assessment of Ficus carica plants from Israel

The European Commission requested the EFSA Panel on Plant Health to prepare and deliver risk assessments for commodities listed in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019 as ‘High risk plants, plant products and other objects’. This Scientific Opinion covers the plant health risks posed by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bragard, Claude, Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina, Di Serio, Francesco, Jacques, Marie‐Agnès, Jaques Miret, Josep Anton, Justesen, Annemarie Fejer, MacLeod, Alan, Magnusson, Christer Sven, Milonas, Panagiotis, Navas‐Cortes, Juan A, Parnell, Stephen, Potting, Roel, Reignault, Philippe Lucien, Thulke, Hans‐Hermann, van der Werf, Wopke, Civera, Antonio Vicent, Yuen, Jonathan, Zappalà, Lucia, Battisti, Andrea, Mas, Hugo, Rigling, Daniel, Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf, Gonthier, Paolo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7818635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33519991
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6353
_version_ 1783638877566664704
author Bragard, Claude
Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina
Di Serio, Francesco
Jacques, Marie‐Agnès
Jaques Miret, Josep Anton
Justesen, Annemarie Fejer
MacLeod, Alan
Magnusson, Christer Sven
Milonas, Panagiotis
Navas‐Cortes, Juan A
Parnell, Stephen
Potting, Roel
Reignault, Philippe Lucien
Thulke, Hans‐Hermann
van der Werf, Wopke
Civera, Antonio Vicent
Yuen, Jonathan
Zappalà, Lucia
Battisti, Andrea
Mas, Hugo
Rigling, Daniel
Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf
Gonthier, Paolo
author_facet Bragard, Claude
Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina
Di Serio, Francesco
Jacques, Marie‐Agnès
Jaques Miret, Josep Anton
Justesen, Annemarie Fejer
MacLeod, Alan
Magnusson, Christer Sven
Milonas, Panagiotis
Navas‐Cortes, Juan A
Parnell, Stephen
Potting, Roel
Reignault, Philippe Lucien
Thulke, Hans‐Hermann
van der Werf, Wopke
Civera, Antonio Vicent
Yuen, Jonathan
Zappalà, Lucia
Battisti, Andrea
Mas, Hugo
Rigling, Daniel
Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf
Gonthier, Paolo
collection PubMed
description The European Commission requested the EFSA Panel on Plant Health to prepare and deliver risk assessments for commodities listed in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019 as ‘High risk plants, plant products and other objects’. This Scientific Opinion covers the plant health risks posed by the following commodities: (i) dormant and free of leaves 1‐year‐old bare rooted plants and (ii) free of leaves 1‐year‐old liners of Ficus carica imported from Israel, taking into account the available scientific information, including the technical information provided by Israel. The relevance of any pest for this opinion was based on evidence following defined criteria. Four EU quarantine pests, Euwallacea fornicatus, Hypothenemus leprieuri, Scirtothrips dorsalis and Spodoptera frugiperda, and 11 EU non‐regulated pests fulfilled all relevant criteria and were selected for further evaluation. For these pests, the risk mitigation measures proposed in the technical dossier from Israel were evaluated separately for bare rooted plants and for liners, taking into account the possible limiting factors. For these pests, an expert judgement was given on the likelihood of pest freedom taking into consideration the risk mitigation measures acting on the pest, including uncertainties associated with the assessment. The estimated degree of pest freedom varied among the pests evaluated. Aonidiella orientalis and Russellaspis pustulans were the most frequently expected pests on the imported bare rooted plants, and Scirtothrips dorsalis on liners. The Expert Knowledge Elicitation indicated, with 95% certainty, that between 9,585 and 10,000 bare rooted plants per 10,000 would be free of Aonidiella orientalis and Russellaspis pustulans and between 9,456 and 10,000 liners per 10,000 would be free of Scirtothrips dorsalis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7818635
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78186352021-01-29 Commodity risk assessment of Ficus carica plants from Israel Bragard, Claude Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina Di Serio, Francesco Jacques, Marie‐Agnès Jaques Miret, Josep Anton Justesen, Annemarie Fejer MacLeod, Alan Magnusson, Christer Sven Milonas, Panagiotis Navas‐Cortes, Juan A Parnell, Stephen Potting, Roel Reignault, Philippe Lucien Thulke, Hans‐Hermann van der Werf, Wopke Civera, Antonio Vicent Yuen, Jonathan Zappalà, Lucia Battisti, Andrea Mas, Hugo Rigling, Daniel Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf Gonthier, Paolo EFSA J Scientific Opinion The European Commission requested the EFSA Panel on Plant Health to prepare and deliver risk assessments for commodities listed in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019 as ‘High risk plants, plant products and other objects’. This Scientific Opinion covers the plant health risks posed by the following commodities: (i) dormant and free of leaves 1‐year‐old bare rooted plants and (ii) free of leaves 1‐year‐old liners of Ficus carica imported from Israel, taking into account the available scientific information, including the technical information provided by Israel. The relevance of any pest for this opinion was based on evidence following defined criteria. Four EU quarantine pests, Euwallacea fornicatus, Hypothenemus leprieuri, Scirtothrips dorsalis and Spodoptera frugiperda, and 11 EU non‐regulated pests fulfilled all relevant criteria and were selected for further evaluation. For these pests, the risk mitigation measures proposed in the technical dossier from Israel were evaluated separately for bare rooted plants and for liners, taking into account the possible limiting factors. For these pests, an expert judgement was given on the likelihood of pest freedom taking into consideration the risk mitigation measures acting on the pest, including uncertainties associated with the assessment. The estimated degree of pest freedom varied among the pests evaluated. Aonidiella orientalis and Russellaspis pustulans were the most frequently expected pests on the imported bare rooted plants, and Scirtothrips dorsalis on liners. The Expert Knowledge Elicitation indicated, with 95% certainty, that between 9,585 and 10,000 bare rooted plants per 10,000 would be free of Aonidiella orientalis and Russellaspis pustulans and between 9,456 and 10,000 liners per 10,000 would be free of Scirtothrips dorsalis. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7818635/ /pubmed/33519991 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6353 Text en © 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Bragard, Claude
Dehnen‐Schmutz, Katharina
Di Serio, Francesco
Jacques, Marie‐Agnès
Jaques Miret, Josep Anton
Justesen, Annemarie Fejer
MacLeod, Alan
Magnusson, Christer Sven
Milonas, Panagiotis
Navas‐Cortes, Juan A
Parnell, Stephen
Potting, Roel
Reignault, Philippe Lucien
Thulke, Hans‐Hermann
van der Werf, Wopke
Civera, Antonio Vicent
Yuen, Jonathan
Zappalà, Lucia
Battisti, Andrea
Mas, Hugo
Rigling, Daniel
Mosbach‐Schulz, Olaf
Gonthier, Paolo
Commodity risk assessment of Ficus carica plants from Israel
title Commodity risk assessment of Ficus carica plants from Israel
title_full Commodity risk assessment of Ficus carica plants from Israel
title_fullStr Commodity risk assessment of Ficus carica plants from Israel
title_full_unstemmed Commodity risk assessment of Ficus carica plants from Israel
title_short Commodity risk assessment of Ficus carica plants from Israel
title_sort commodity risk assessment of ficus carica plants from israel
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7818635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33519991
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6353
work_keys_str_mv AT commodityriskassessmentofficuscaricaplantsfromisrael
AT bragardclaude commodityriskassessmentofficuscaricaplantsfromisrael
AT dehnenschmutzkatharina commodityriskassessmentofficuscaricaplantsfromisrael
AT diseriofrancesco commodityriskassessmentofficuscaricaplantsfromisrael
AT jacquesmarieagnes commodityriskassessmentofficuscaricaplantsfromisrael
AT jaquesmiretjosepanton commodityriskassessmentofficuscaricaplantsfromisrael
AT justesenannemariefejer commodityriskassessmentofficuscaricaplantsfromisrael
AT macleodalan commodityriskassessmentofficuscaricaplantsfromisrael
AT magnussonchristersven commodityriskassessmentofficuscaricaplantsfromisrael
AT milonaspanagiotis commodityriskassessmentofficuscaricaplantsfromisrael
AT navascortesjuana commodityriskassessmentofficuscaricaplantsfromisrael
AT parnellstephen commodityriskassessmentofficuscaricaplantsfromisrael
AT pottingroel commodityriskassessmentofficuscaricaplantsfromisrael
AT reignaultphilippelucien commodityriskassessmentofficuscaricaplantsfromisrael
AT thulkehanshermann commodityriskassessmentofficuscaricaplantsfromisrael
AT vanderwerfwopke commodityriskassessmentofficuscaricaplantsfromisrael
AT civeraantoniovicent commodityriskassessmentofficuscaricaplantsfromisrael
AT yuenjonathan commodityriskassessmentofficuscaricaplantsfromisrael
AT zappalalucia commodityriskassessmentofficuscaricaplantsfromisrael
AT battistiandrea commodityriskassessmentofficuscaricaplantsfromisrael
AT mashugo commodityriskassessmentofficuscaricaplantsfromisrael
AT riglingdaniel commodityriskassessmentofficuscaricaplantsfromisrael
AT mosbachschulzolaf commodityriskassessmentofficuscaricaplantsfromisrael
AT gonthierpaolo commodityriskassessmentofficuscaricaplantsfromisrael