Cargando…
Kinetic Analysis of Methane–Propane Hydrate Formation by the Use of Different Impellers
[Image: see text] In the present study, the effect of different kinds of impellers with different baffles or no baffle was investigated. Up-pumping pitched blade turbine (PBTU) and Rushton turbine (RT) were the two types of impellers tested. The reactor was equipped with different designs of baffles...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2021
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7818645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33490823 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c05615 |
_version_ | 1783638880037109760 |
---|---|
author | Longinos, Sotirios Nik Parlaktuna, Mahmut |
author_facet | Longinos, Sotirios Nik Parlaktuna, Mahmut |
author_sort | Longinos, Sotirios Nik |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] In the present study, the effect of different kinds of impellers with different baffles or no baffle was investigated. Up-pumping pitched blade turbine (PBTU) and Rushton turbine (RT) were the two types of impellers tested. The reactor was equipped with different designs of baffles: full, half and surface baffles, or no baffles. Single (PBTU or RT) and dual (PBTU/PBTU or RT/RT) use of impellers with full (FB), half (HB), surface (SB), and no baffle (NB) combinations formed two sets of 16 experiments. The first group of experiments was close to the equilibrium line (P = 26.5 bars and T = 8.5 °C), and the second group was deep in the equilibrium line (P = 24.5 bars and T = 2 °C). There was estimation of rate of hydrate formation, induction time, hydrate productivity, overall power consumption, split fraction, and separation factor. In both single and dual impellers, the results showed that RT experiments are better compared to PBTU in the rate of hydrate formation. The induction time is almost the same because we are deep in the equilibrium line while, hydrate productivity values are higher in PBTU compared to RT experiments. As a general view, RT experiments consume more energy compared to PBTU experiments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7818645 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78186452021-01-22 Kinetic Analysis of Methane–Propane Hydrate Formation by the Use of Different Impellers Longinos, Sotirios Nik Parlaktuna, Mahmut ACS Omega [Image: see text] In the present study, the effect of different kinds of impellers with different baffles or no baffle was investigated. Up-pumping pitched blade turbine (PBTU) and Rushton turbine (RT) were the two types of impellers tested. The reactor was equipped with different designs of baffles: full, half and surface baffles, or no baffles. Single (PBTU or RT) and dual (PBTU/PBTU or RT/RT) use of impellers with full (FB), half (HB), surface (SB), and no baffle (NB) combinations formed two sets of 16 experiments. The first group of experiments was close to the equilibrium line (P = 26.5 bars and T = 8.5 °C), and the second group was deep in the equilibrium line (P = 24.5 bars and T = 2 °C). There was estimation of rate of hydrate formation, induction time, hydrate productivity, overall power consumption, split fraction, and separation factor. In both single and dual impellers, the results showed that RT experiments are better compared to PBTU in the rate of hydrate formation. The induction time is almost the same because we are deep in the equilibrium line while, hydrate productivity values are higher in PBTU compared to RT experiments. As a general view, RT experiments consume more energy compared to PBTU experiments. American Chemical Society 2021-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7818645/ /pubmed/33490823 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c05615 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Non-Commercial No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND) Attribution License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_ccbyncnd_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article, and creation of adaptations, all for non-commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Longinos, Sotirios Nik Parlaktuna, Mahmut Kinetic Analysis of Methane–Propane Hydrate Formation by the Use of Different Impellers |
title | Kinetic Analysis of Methane–Propane Hydrate
Formation by the Use of Different Impellers |
title_full | Kinetic Analysis of Methane–Propane Hydrate
Formation by the Use of Different Impellers |
title_fullStr | Kinetic Analysis of Methane–Propane Hydrate
Formation by the Use of Different Impellers |
title_full_unstemmed | Kinetic Analysis of Methane–Propane Hydrate
Formation by the Use of Different Impellers |
title_short | Kinetic Analysis of Methane–Propane Hydrate
Formation by the Use of Different Impellers |
title_sort | kinetic analysis of methane–propane hydrate
formation by the use of different impellers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7818645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33490823 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c05615 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT longinossotiriosnik kineticanalysisofmethanepropanehydrateformationbytheuseofdifferentimpellers AT parlaktunamahmut kineticanalysisofmethanepropanehydrateformationbytheuseofdifferentimpellers |